Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

With either the traditional Hammer Classic, or the slightly more modern Sharptail, CZ has made guns worthy of “riding shotgun.”

The shotgun has long and rightfully been regarded as the most useful of firearms. Because of its wide range of projectiles, even the old smoothbore flintlock fowlers were good for everything in the woods up to 75 yards or so.

But the carriage gun, or “coach gun” as it was called here in the West, was a specialty item. With its shorter barrel, and corresponding shorter sight radius, it was designed for use against other humans.  Even more specifically, it was designed to shoot humans riding horseback while the shooter was mounted on a moving horse-drawn carriage. That ain’t easy to do. I’ve tried shooting from atop a running horse at a stationary balloon, and that was nigh impossible. I can’t imagine how hard it would be if the target was moving too…and shooting back!

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

And yet, that’s exactly what folks had to do. Carriage routes were spanned by messenger services like the Pony Express, and by private carriers, the most famous of which was Wells Fargo, well before the American West was tamed of killers and thieves. Folks traveling by horse-drawn carriage were under regular threat of robbery and death by several of the native tribes and just as often by common thieves.

The coach gun was the answer to the call for a short-range, powerful firearm capable of firing and reloading from a shaky platform.

The idea of a coach gun being associated with the American West is certainly justified, but the coach gun didn’t start there. In fact, the basics of the coach gun existed for literally hundreds of years prior to the expansion of the American West.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

Long before Lewis and Clark carried it on their expedition, long before it was used at Harper’s Ferry, even before its use in the Plymouth colonies, the blunderbuss was in hard use on carriages in the Old World. Short in length, fast to shoot, reload, and shoot again from a moving carriage, the blunderbuss was considered the earliest purpose-designed “carriage gun.” After all, what do you think that big flared muzzle is for? It’s so that powder and shot can be loaded quickly on a moving, shaky platform.

As America would realize her Manifest Destiny, coach guns, often called “Messenger Guns,” found further refinement.  These short, usually double-barreled cartridge shotguns became ubiquitous with the men riding the stages, as well as Texas Rangers and mounted lawmen throughout the South and Southwest.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

The most obvious difference between the two CZ coach guns is that the Shaprtail is a more modern, cock-on-close side by side while the Hammer Classic has…um…hammers.

The Sharptail’s manual of arms is pretty simple. Open the gun by pressing the release lever on the grip tang to the right, open the gun, insert rounds, close the guns, pull the trigger. If you want the second barrel to fire, pull the trigger again. There’s just one trigger. The tang-mounted safety does not reengage after shots or after the gun is opened. You can choose which barrel fires first by moving the selector mounted within the safety.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

The Hammer Classic is a bit more complex. After you close the loaded gun, regardless of the position of the safety, you’ll need to pull one or both of the hammers back. The Hammer Classic has two triggers. The front trigger fires the right barrel, the rear trigger the left.

The Sharptail is faster and more practical, the Hammer Classic a little more traditional, and just plain cool.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

Each firearm comes broken down in a plastic case. If you read that and thought “GLOCK lunchbox,” think again. Each piece is velvet-sleeved, and set into the semi-fitted case. It snaps shut with four closures and, although not quite sturdy enough for airline travel, would do well for any other standard storage or transportation.

Breakdown or reassembly is simple and easy with the takedown lever located under the fore end of each shotgun.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

Each gun is lightly engraved…really just some hand embellishments. It’s not lots of deep scroll work, but the simple hammer stamps and a little bit of scrolling lines into the gun blend well and give the gun a refined look.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

Note that on both guns all of the screws are correctly oriented with the long lines of the firearms. Each flathead screw is slightly embellished and finished the same as the receivers. That’s a nice touch.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

Even without looking at the triggers on the Hammer Classic, they would be hard to get confused. They are not that far apart from each other, but feel very different. The rear trigger is smaller and more curved, while the front is also wider than the rear.

Obviously, without the need to cock the hammers, the Sharptail is going to be the faster of the two guns to load and fire. That said, I was able to cock both of the Hammer Classic’s hammers by simply sweeping my support hand hard back over them. According to my timer, I’m almost a full second slower with the Hammer Classic than I am with the Sharptail. Not much, but it’s something.

I would highly recommend practicing this speed cocking maneuver extensively with snap-caps before loading the barrels and trying this with live rounds, as it is possible to set off the gun like this prior to fully mounting it. Remember, amateurs practice until they get it right, professionals practice until they can’t get it wrong.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

The hammers are also close enough to simply reach up with my firing hand and cock with my thumb, while keeping the rest of my hand on the wrist of the stock.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

All of the hardware, save the barrels, on each gun are have a color case hardened finish.  The finish is a simple chemical processes, not actual bone and charcoal case hardening. It is done very well.

The finish is beautiful. Just gorgeous. As I said, all of the parts, save the triggers and the barrels, are color cased finished and polished. These guns are relatively inexpensive, but they certainly don’t look it.

Most of the wood-to-metal fit is quite good, although there are a few gaps and uneven places here and there. In some spots, the wood is recessed to the metal, in some other spots, it stand just a bit proud.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

The wood itself is Turkish walnut, with some really nice, deep checkering. This is not AAA Fancy Turkish Walnut. The stock blanks alone would be worth more than the entire shotgun if that were the case. Still, it’s nice wood, and far better than we find on most American-made shotguns and rifles at considerably higher prices.

The stock geometry fits well, with a length of pull likely appropriate for male or larger female shooters. It will be a little long for you shorter folks. I found the wrist to be a little narrow for my size large hands. The comb height was a little low for me, and it’s a straight drop with no cast. The overall geometry is great for what the coach guns were designed to do, which is simply to shoot folks up close and fast while on the move.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

Neither shotgun includes a rear sight, but each has a single front sight with a white plastic insert at the end of the serrated rib in the middle of the 20″ barrels.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

Although the exterior of the shotguns are very well executed, the interiors are a just OK. Small tool marks abound. Nothing is particularly well polished on the inside. Overall, it’s just a little rough.

Note that the shells do not eject. They simply extract. The breach of each barrel is also not chamfered or funneled in any way, so if you want to shoot Cowboy Action Style matches, that’s probably something you’ll want to do or have done if you intend to be competitive.

The action of both guns came out of the box very stiff. To be fair, these guns sat in the TTAG safe for many months before anyone got to review them. The oil they were packed in was fairly set by the time I got them, so they really should have had a deep cleaning prior to my shooting. Instead, I liberally sprayed them with Eezox and ran a bore snake through each tube and got to blastin’.

Although the actions started stiff, by the end of the review, just a quick snap up while holding the action release and the guns came right open. Of course, that was after hundreds of openings and closing of each firearm.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

These guns are made by Huglu in Turkey for CZ-USA. Huglu makes some gorgeous, well-performing guns by any standard. The CZ coach guns are by no means the top of the line that Huglu produces.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

The short, fairly thin barrels make recoil stout but handling quick. These are not designed to be guns with weight at the end for swinging and shooting flying birds and clays. They need to be brought up fast, stopped quick, and moved to reload even quicker. The barrel length and weight are appropriate for just that.

As far as historical barrel length, these are a right in the middle. The shotguns purchased by Wells Fargo for their “Messenger Guns” were 24″ and 26″ barrels, but many made prior to the company’s bulk purchases were as short as 14″. Shorter, “sawed-off” shotguns did exist, but they were fairly rare.

Remember these were originally black powder cartridge guns and super fine grain powder was unheard of in the old west. That black powder needs some barrel to burn. Twenty inches for these guns is just perfect.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

Both barrels on both guns are fixed cylinder bore. The old adage of 1″ spread of 00 per yard held true. Aiming at the center of a silhouette target at 25 yards, and using 2 3/4″ 9-pellet 00 buckshot, 7 of the 9 pellets hit the target. Obviously, they all struck left of center using the left barrel and right of center with the right barrel. Aiming at the left edge of the target and shooting with the right barrel landed all 9 pellets into the target. Shoot both barrels of either gun full of birdshot at 15 yards and you’ll absolutely cover the target.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

I put quite a bit of birdshot through each of these guns just to get the feel for them, but birdshot isn’t what these guns were historically for. Coach guns were the quintessential close-range combat firearms for a couple of hundred years, and they were made to fire heavy shot. I put 100 rounds of 00 buckshot through each of these shotguns over a few days time.

Gun Review: CZ Hammer Coach and Sharptail Side by Side Shotguns

Throughout the review, I had no failures to fire or failures to release the barrels and extract. The buckshot hulls always fell out with a sharp jerk of the gun. The safeties never failed to engage or disengage quickly and easily. The barrel selector on the Sharptail never stuck, and never failed to work. Quite simply, the guns performed flawlessly.

That said, especially the with the Hammer Classic, you had better keep a tight grip on the gun when shooting buckshot. Recoil is not overwhelming, and quick “one-two” shots on target are completely doable, but you will certainly know when you’ve pulled the trigger.

Unlike the Sharptail, the Hammer Classic has no recoil pad. There are no sharp edges, but still, after 100 rounds, my shoulder was feeling it. So was my jaw, as to get a good sight picture on either gun, I had to press my face down onto the walnut stock firmly. Under the recoil of the 00 buck, with either gun, my face took a bit of a beating.

I’m a big fan of CZ, and these two SxS guns are yet another example of why. Beautiful guns that perform their purpose very well, and at a surprisingly low price point. Both of these guns have MSRP’s under $1,000, and retail prices from $800 to $850. These are classy, fun guns to own and to shoot.

SPECIFICATIONS

CZ Hammer Coach 12 Gauge, 20″ Barrels
SKU: 06130
Chambering: 12 Gauge
Max Shell Length: 3 in
Barrel Length: 20
Stock: Turkish walnut stock with pistol grip
Length Of Pull: 14 1/2 in
Forend Style: Spliter Forend
Receiver Finish: Color Case Hardened
Barrel Finish: Gloss Black Chrome
Rib: 8mm Flat
Overall Length: 37.38 in
Weight: 6.7 lbs
Comb: 1 1/2 in
Heel: 2 1/4 in
Trigger Mech: Dual Triggers
Safety: Manual Tang Safety, Rebounding Hammers
MSRP: $922.00 (less via Brownells)

CZ Sharp-Tail Coach 12 Gauge
SKU: 06418
Chambering: 12 Gauge
Max Shell Length: 3 in
Barrel Length: 20 in
Stock: Turkish Walnut
Length Of Pull: 14.5 in
Forend Style: Semi-Beavertail
Receiver Finish: Color Case Hardened
Barrel Finish: Black Hard Chrome
Rib: Raised
Overall Length: 37.5 in
Weight: 6 lbs
Comb: 1.5 in
Heel: 2.25 in
Trigger: Mechanical Single Selectable
Safety: Manual
MSRP: $959.00

Ratings (out of five stars):

Style and Appearance * * * * *
The engraving, the wood, and the finish aren’t world class. But it’s not really fair to compare these against shotguns costing 25 to 100 times as much, either. For the price, they are extremely well furnished and adorned.

Customization *
You could change the front sight out with minimal work, and it’s fairly easy to do unnecessary trigger work.

Reliability * * * * *
Everything worked every time on both guns.

Accuracy * * * * *
The wide pattern remained consistent within shell brands and types.

Overall * * * * 1/2
The internals could be better polished and the wood-to-metal fit could be a little better in some places. But overall, these are just outstanding guns for this price point. How’s this for an endorsement: I tried to buy this Hammer Classic, but another TTAG writer had already beat me to it!

comments

  1. avatar Gov. William J Le Petomane says:

    You’d be hard pressed to find a purdier pair for that kind of money. But they should just leave the wood a bit proud all around. It looks nice that way and small imperfections in wood to metal fit aren’t so obvious.

    1. avatar Geoff "Mess with the bull, get the 6.5mm Creedmoor" PR says:

      “But they should just leave the wood a bit proud all around. It looks nice that way and small imperfections in wood to metal fit aren’t so obvious.”

      Disagree.

      If the fit is proud, even a *tiny* bit, you can feel it, and it doesn’t feel ‘right’…

      1. avatar Gov. William J Le Petomane says:

        I’m not talking about a $4000 shotgun here. The S,R&Co No. 1s are left proud and I don’t have an issue with them. Better than being a touch shy here and a touch proud there.

      2. avatar jwtaylor says:

        The wood on the finest Victorian age firearms would have been left a bit proud on purpose.

  2. avatar raptor jesus says:

    I mean, these are cool and all, but at three times the price of a pump gun that has substantially more capacity, you’ve got to REALLY want one.

    1. avatar Bloving says:

      Oh, make no mistake about it: “because I want one” is precisely why they exist. They will not, nor were meant to, replace any modern shotty.
      🤠

    2. avatar Gov. William J Le Petomane says:

      Just my logic, but 16 rounds of 9 mm = 9 rounds of .357 in a lever gun, = 6 rounds of .44 magnum in a wheel gun, = 2 rounds of 12ga. The coach gun would work just fine for self defense, but I wouldn’t want the hammers for that.

      Life’s too short to surround yourself with ugly guns.

      1. avatar Gov. William J Le Petomane says:

        Might add that my 22″ pump is over 44″ long vs these 20″ side by sides at 37.5″, so that’s a fairly significant advantage in a 36″ hallway.

        1. avatar New Continental Army says:

          And you can touch off both barrels at once.

        2. avatar Gov. William J Le Petomane says:

          Which is why the hammer version is the preferred choice of masochists.

      2. avatar raptor jesus says:

        Please don’t shoot 00 buck indoors.

    3. avatar Ing says:

      I really want one.

      1. avatar possum says:

        Meeeee tooo, Go Fund Me. 778-9026 all or any donations truly appreciated. And my promise, any one donating can come ourt and shoot it, I will supply ammunition.

  3. avatar Mark N. says:

    The price is in line if not less than some of the competition, and the guns are beautiful. I suspect the quality is superior as well. I think the cowboy shooting crowd will be snapping these up, you know, those guys and gals who spend $800 on a tuned Italian made Colt clone. (Which are actually very good guns.)

  4. avatar Manse Jolly says:

    Good review, I enjoyed reading….Yes! I want one…either will do.

  5. avatar Big Al says:

    The Lewis & Clark expedition carried NO conventional (black powder) firearms of the day. On the contrary! Merriweather Lewis took his personal AIR GUNS. Look it up for yourself. Black powder of that time (1803) would have decomposed long before the expedition was back to “civilization”.

    1. avatar jwm says:

      They had a variety of guns to include a swivel gun, a blunderbus and a variety of muskets and rifles. They also molded lead for their guns into flasks to carry their powder in. Eliminated the need for seperate containers to carry both.

      Yes, they had air rifles. But they were not the primary arms of the expedition.

    2. avatar jwtaylor says:

      Big Al, that’s not true at all. They carried both the air rifle as well as several black powder firearms. The powder was stored in smart lead buckets, which made just enough shot for the amount of powder in them.
      As a matter of fact, the blunderbuss I put in the article is the exact type carried by the expedition.
      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blunderbuss

      1. avatar Chris Heuss says:

        Tell me you have read “Undaunghted Courage” by Stephen Ambrose. Excellent book about Lewis & Clark. It’s one of my favorite book. I was lucky and found a Signed copy in like new condition. What’s with this guy saying they carried no traditional guns? An American expedition without guns? Wroooooong

        1. avatar jwtaylor says:

          Of course I have. Required reading.

    3. avatar Specialist38 says:

      They did carry air rifles but also carried conventional arms as well.

      https://centerofthewest.org/2017/03/10/guns-lewis-clark/

    4. avatar New Continental Army says:

      Shining example of the Disinformation Age, right here.

    5. avatar Billy Bob says:

      They had one air gun. They also had many black powder firearms.

  6. avatar Rick says:

    Why is the last picture upside down?

    1. avatar possum says:

      The camera man was standing on his head.

    2. avatar jwtaylor says:

      It’s not for me.

    3. avatar Jeremy S. says:

      It’s correct for me, too. We’ve seen this kind of thing happen from time-to-time with iOS stuff, though, where it “auto-corrects” photos that show up fine in Chrome and other browsers but in the mobile browser they’re flipped for some reason. Can’t explain it. Something in the metadata telling iOS to orient it differently rather than just displaying it as it is in the blog here.

  7. avatar possum says:

    I can’t do a grand, would be A real seller at $500. Hammer doubles around here that’s worth owning are hard to find…. The twelve gauge, out of the caliber wars regarding shotguns the 12 seems to be king.

  8. avatar bontai joe says:

    Hmmmmmmm……… pretty. And I have absolutely, positively, no need for one of these, and yet I want one.

  9. avatar John in AK says:

    I appreciate that this article mentioned that these ‘CZs’ were actually Turkish Huglus, and that the fit and finish was a tad spotty, the interior finishing the same, and that the ‘case hardening’ is actually from a chemical bath and not true ‘hardening.’ One does, sometimes, get what one pays for.
    I have to give any prospective purchasers a warning, though;l The quality control on these guns may also be ‘spotty,’ and skimping on proper finishing and hardening techniques may extend to the internal parts, right down to the springs.
    My experience with a CZ-Huglu hammerless 12-gauge double revealed the same things that the article relates: The wood, although ‘Turkish Walnut,’ was coarse grained and had a nasty tendency to splinter and chip at pressure points (heel and toe of stock, recoil area behind frame). The screws were universally too soft (mild steel) in the heads, with narrow, European-style slots that don’t fit most gunsmithing screwdriver blades. Be prepared to grind one to fit, and to refinish the slots when you’re done.
    That ‘color’ on the frame and other parts is just a thin, chemical-bath (probably cyanide) staining of the soft steel beneath; The interior of the gun I worked on was poorly finished, with gross tool and chatter marks abounding, sharp edges galor, and chunks of casting debris adhering in unmachined spots.
    The internal parts were coarsely finished with files, hand-fitted by rather lackadaisical workmen, and any replacement part had to be filed (a lot!) to actually fit. In my sample gun, the left- and right-hand components were not only not interchangeable, they had visibly different overall dimensions.
    And the springs. . .
    The reason I was given the gun to work on in the first place was because the left’hand mechanism went ‘dead’ after one fall of the internal hammer; The right soldiered on.
    What I found, of course, was that the left mainspring (a complicated V-type) had broken; It had snapped off on the end adjacent the cocking levers at the front.
    So, new spring ordered and received, matched in size to the original, and happily installed. Pull the trigger. .
    PING. New, now broken mainspring. New assortment of different-sized Huglu springs ordered. . . Ahah! Original spring was fitted at the factory without ever checking to find out that its lower leg was actually a few thousands of an inch too long , causing the hammer face to force the spring forward against the cocking lever, breaking it automatically every time the hammer fell. A few strokes of a file on the end of the new, NEW spring, and all was well.
    Did I mention that the interior finish of both barrels would snag a cleaning patch pushed down either tube, and tear fibers out of it?
    Sorry. Should’ve brought that up.
    Not that many years ago, a gun of this quality would’ve sold in the Sears, Roebuck catalog for about $5.00.
    Your experience may vary.

    1. avatar jwm says:

      I always inquire about shotguns being Turkish made. A late friend of mine bought a new stack barrel that was Turkish made and had immediate problems with it. Problems that had the gun sent back at least twice and were never properly sorted.

      No Turkish shotguns for me.

    2. avatar Robert Fory says:

      I’ve never seen a barrel as rough as shown in the picture of the chamber.

  10. avatar possum says:

    Thinking of price, quality, production. Back in the day( I hate that cliché btw) doubles were cheaper to make because of what was required to make them. More tooling went into an auto or pump then in a simple drop action firearm , CNC n what not kinda stopped that. So with that the price of this shotgun is not to bad. I’d sure buy it at $500 but sorry cZ $1000 is just to much. I M “po man” O

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email