What’s the difference between 5.56mm NATO and .223 Remington, anyhow? The rounds are supposed to be interchangeable…kinda/sorta/maybe…right?
The difference in the round itself: the NATO round is a little hotter. The case is the same size, but the powder charge, projectile and also rifle specifications differ. As a result, make sure to check your AR-15 to see which it’s chambered for, as not all AR-15 rifles sold to civilians are the same.
NATO, you see, develops standardized loads so that any member nation has specifications they make a round to. As a result, a NATO round is a NATO round is a NATO round.
The standard loading is NATO SS109 (aka M855) which uses a 62-grain projectile. The powder charge for that round is on the hot side, which is loaded to chamber pressures around 62,400 psi in a rifle chambered for 5.56mm NATO. In a rifle chambered for .223 Remington, the round produces chamber pressures upward of 70,000 psi, if going by SAAMI (the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers Institute) standards.
By contrast, .223 Remington tends to produce lower chamber pressures between 52,000 and 55,000 psi, going by SAAMI specs. Therefore, 5.56mm NATO ammo isn’t safe for use in a rifle chambered for .223 Remington, but .223 is OK in 5.56. Thus, powder charge is the main difference between 5.56 vs .223 cartridges.
NATO specifies that any rifle chambered for 5.56mm have a longer leade than that employed for the .223 Remington round. The leade is the distance between the case mouth and the point at which the rifling begins in the barrel.
The .223 Remington chamber dimensions create a tighter seal on the projectile, and thus produces more pressure despite firing the same size of projectile from the same case, given a slightly hotter powder charge, since more gas escapes with the larger leade.
The length and diameter of the leade – called the “freebore” – is longer and wider for the 5.56mm round, meaning there is a wider, longer free space the bullet travels in before it contacts the grooves in the barrel.
In addition to the higher pressure, NATO specs also call for any rifle made for use by NATO forces – including the M16, the M4 and other service rifles like the L85A2 of the UK or France’s FAMAS – have rifling with a 1:7 twist, or in other words 7 inches for a full 360 degrees of rifling rotation. This is so the NATO L110 tracer round (which has a longer projectile) can be fired from the same rifle as the standard ball round, as the optimal twist rate for the 62gr 5.56mm round is more like 1:9.
Most civilian AR-15 pattern rifles have a twist rate of 1:9, which is actually something of a compromise. The slower twist rate enables the shooter to use different bullet weights, whereas a NATO-spec gun pretty much uses 62gr ball and 77gr tracer rounds only.
The civilian shooter could, conceivably, shoot a mix of 40gr varmint rounds, 50- and 55gr ball at the range, and even 62gr ball for when they’re feeling squirrely. Lighter bullets benefit from a slower twist rate (1:10 or even 1:12) so a twist rate of 1:8 or 1:9 makes it so you can get decent performance from anything.
So…5.56 vs .223. The former uses slightly more powder. Rifles chambered for it must adhere to certain specifications to suit it, as it is a standardized military cartridge. The latter also adheres to different specifications (such as a shorter leade) but has a much more diverse array of loadings from available from ammunition manufacturers. Case dimensions, however, are the same.
What this means in practical terms is that you won’t get the most out of actual 5.56 NATO ammo unless your rifle is made to NATO specifications such as the leade, twist rate, and can take somewhat higher chamber pressures. Thus, with its lower pressures, .223 can be safely used in a NATO-spec rifle in 5.56mm, but not the other way around.
Which brings us also to the .223 Wylde round. This isn’t actually a bullet. Instead, it’s a set of specifications that enable a rifle to use both cartridges.
Put more accurately, it’s actually a .223 Wylde chamber. It was devised by one Bill Wylde, who came up with a solution allowing for safe use of both bullets in the same gun while maintaining accuracy. This is accomplished by resizing the chamber for the same length of leade of 5.56mm NATO, but with the freebore diameter of .223 Remington. Either caliber headspaces correctly, preserving accuracy for both.
Now…which one should you get? The NATO cartridge or .223? 5.56 vs. 223?
The answer is you should first consider what you want it for. A gun, any gun, is a tool, ultimately, so therefore consider your task.
The .223 Remington chambering is the better all ’rounder. You can do a bunch of shooting at the range and in competition. You can load a bit heavier for hunting predators or varminting and – since most .223 rifles have that slower twist rate, shorter leade and tighter freebore – the .223 will likely be more accurate.
This means it will be more precise at long range, though there are better rifle chamberings purely for long-range target work and varminting (.22-250 and .243 Winchester come to mind). There is also a better selection of ammunition for hunting other game – if you live in a jurisdiction that allows it – and for self-defense.
5.56mm NATO has fewer loadings commercially available and is also a dollar or two more expensive per box…but you get to say “mine uses military-spec ammo.” In terms of real-world capabilities of the round, that isn’t worth…well, basically anything. Is that worth much to you?
Let us know in the comments what YOU think about that.