New from SB-Tactical and CAA: RONI-STAB

CAA RONI-STAB (courtesy

The RONI-STAB is a cool concept. Insert your handgun into their carbine thingie and voila! A handgun-calibered carbine offering greater control, increased velocity and accuracy. Lights! Lasers! Fore grip? Coffee maker! Unfortunately, the original RONI was an NFA item, with all the paperwork and hassle that requires. Not anymore.

With the simple addition of an SB-Tactical brace, you can now buy a RONI-STAB for your GLOCK, Beretta, HK, SIG SAUER, Springfield XD and other pistols to be named later without the wait time, tax and hassle. Just don’t shoulder it, m’kay? Press release [via]

Saint Petersburg, Fla. – ( – SB Tactical, inventors and manufacturers of the Pistol Stabilizing Brace, is pleased to announce its official OEM partnership with CAA, the exclusive distributor of world-class, operator-tested firearms accessories and the Hartman MH1 Reflex Sights.

CAA is now shipping the Non-NFA RONI featuring an officially licensed SB Tactical Pistol Stabilizing Brace.

The Pistol Stabilizing Brace enhances one-hand firing of the RONI-STAB and optimizes control by providing a third point of contact. The RONI-STAB is the first Non-NFA RONI available, meaning less paperwork, no wait times, and no additional costs.

The RONI-STAB is designed to fit multiple handgun models – the GLOCK 17/19 is available now – and there are models available for Beretta, HK, SIG SAUER, Springfield XD and many other brands.

The expansion of the SB Tactical product portfolio and OEM relationships illustrates SB Tactical’s commitment to driving innovation and offering customers the most useful accessories for the PDW pistol category.

For more information about SB Tactical and its complete line of products, visit and follow @SBTactical on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.


  1. avatar bawb says:


    Needs a bayonet lug, meathook (like on a Franch SPAS), 4-14×40 scope, snail drum. I wonder if one can hit 15 lbs without resorting to target pistol weights or mercury tubes…

  2. avatar Sammy says:

    Please correct me is I am wrong, but putting a forward vertical grip on a pistol is a no-no, no?

    1. avatar Anner says:

      Correct, unless the overall length is 26″ or greater, in which case it’s non-NFA. However, in this specific case with an accessory making the pistol OAL 26″ or greater, it may be classified differently…someone chime in with more knowledge?

    2. avatar LarryinTX says:

      Last I heard, that is correct.

    3. avatar Jeff the Griz says:

      That is already an NFA item in the photo, that is a stock not an SB on the rear. Let’s just get rid of the stupid NFA laws!

  3. avatar 16V says:

    Ronnie,stab my eyes out…

    What a jumbled mess with no cohesive angles, styling, or even allusion to a sense of purpose.

    Oh well. Somewhere there’s a mall-ninja with a raging semi…

    1. avatar Mark N. says:

      I think it’s a Transformer….or something.

      1. avatar James69 says:

        Lock 2 of them together and they make an M41a Pulse rifle. (40 watt range?) Lock 4 together and it makes a M56 Smartgun.

  4. avatar ActionPhysicalMan says:

    I’d be embarrassed to be seen with that thing in my hands.

  5. avatar Anonymous says:

    I think I saw this on that “Halo” video game.

  6. avatar SouthernPhantom says:

    So like a Sub-2K, only more expensive and existing in a very dubious legal area. Great!

    1. avatar kenneth says:

      A ten pound ‘rifle’ with a 4 inch barrel chambered in 9mmP? What’s not to like? It should make it perfect for taking 500 yard shots! It probably costs 500 bucks or so(the cost of plastic being so high and all), but what’s a few dollars to a mall ninja wannabe?

  7. avatar Sammy^ says:

    Feinstein’s head will explode when she sees this picture!

    1. avatar bawb says:

      Well, I must hand it to them, it does have a remarkable amount of military style assault features that aren’t needed for hunting and belong on the battlefield.

      1. avatar Sammy^ says:

        I never said it was a bad thing or “why would you need it”. I think it’s a bitchin’ picture.

  8. avatar David says:

    Incorrect photo. The SB version is quite a bit different and is on CAAS website.

  9. avatar Curtis in IL says:

    And I would use one of these for… what, exactly?

  10. avatar Aerindel says:


  11. avatar John P. says:

    No. Just no.

  12. avatar Bob363 says:

    It will make a good prop for a sci-fi B-movie.

  13. avatar Dyspeptic Gunsmith says:

    Go ahead, admit it. You’re trying to troll me here. You think you’re waving a red flag in front of a bull.

    Sorry, no, I’m not going to bite.

  14. avatar ikocher says:

    Waiting for a Micro STAB for the P226

  15. avatar js says:

    Because we all want crappy Glock triggers on our rifles, too…

  16. For anyone who wants actual pictures of the item in question since apparently TTAG is too lazy or busy. These are taken directly from CAA’s site and I am linking directly to them as to not infringe. (MICRO)

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email