Back when I edited videotape for CNN, producers would demand that an editor finish a news “package” by a certain time. In many cases it was impossible. We had an app for that: smile, salute and say KBISFB! We never told the producers it meant Keep Believing It, Shit for Brains. And now I’d like to propose another neologism: Schakowsky. Whenever a proponent of civilian disarmament says “I support the Second Amendment but . . .”, whenever a gun grabber tries to convince the public that they support “reasonable gun control,” just say Schakowsky. Well, and the rest. Yes?

Recommended For You

21 Responses to A New Word for Gun Control Advocates’ Deceitful Incrementalism: “Schakowsky”

  1. We all know that banning “Modern Sporting Rifles” is an easy way for the gun grabbers to get a foothold on banning all guns. They’ll take them away one style and type at a time until no one has a gun.

    • Yes. I say if these socialistic retards like the U.K. so much they should go ahead and move them and any of their offspring there.

    • They’ve already taken(all but) the full autos and made them so most normal folks can not afford them. Those are protected by the Second Amendment…yet our government conveniently turns a blind eye to it…

  2. She is probably in trouble with Obama, as if we didn’t know what the plan is and has been all along.

  3. This is why we must fight them at every turn. The AR-15 shooter’s fight is your fight, even if you just have a 20 gauge for shooting clays. Heck, it’s your fight even if you have no guns at all.

  4. Good ol’ Jan. The ever reliable Machine Statist from the 9th District. Make no mistake, she means what she says. She knows this is a game of small steps. A little here and a little there. It may take 20-30 years, but it’s worth it to a Statist. Throw in the occasional tragedy and maybe you can shave off a few years from the timeline.

    Side note: her district is now made up of some of the more well off Chicago suburbs and she still won 66% of the 2012 vote against a fill-in, no name Republican. Given the state of the local GOP here, expect Statist Jan to be around for awhile.

    Illustrating Chicago’s Murders, Homicides, Violence and Idiocy at heyjackass.com

  5. I don’t care who you are, or think you are, if you own a firearm any firearm they (Treasonous dirtbags like Schakowsky) want to take them all, wake up America.

  6. Share this with all of your hunting friends. Someone also needs to share this with the NRA and they need to make a commercial out of it. This could be a turning moment for us.

    Does someone here have a good NRA connection to contact?

    • This illustrates perfectly what gun rights proponents have been saying all along: they dont want you to own any gun. They want guns in the hands of people on their payroll and that is it. Glad we finally have one of the statist jackholes on video stating their true intentions.

  7. Open invite to Jan:
    Would love to have you visit. Come to my house and take them. Let others know how well it goes for you.
    Moron labe.

    • If you need assistance, just let me know, they’ll have to step over my corpse before I’ll let ’em get to you.

  8. We (Gunners) lost the debate as soon as we agreed to hear the other side. We shouldn’t even be having a discussion on Gun Control (aka Civilian Disarmament) to begin with!

    It’s like having a discussion to make Jews wear pieces of flair again or to take away Women’s Right to Vote or to enslave Blacks again.

    Once you agree to hear the other side’s stance on an issue involving UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, you lose!

  9. Yet another admission of deception and misrepresentation. But what are you going to do in a state the is the home of UN-American politicians? Reminds me of Bill Murry’s “What about Bob?”- baby steps.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *