I was impressed by the IWI Galil ACE in 7.62X39 I reviewed last year. But even as I reviewed it, I was intrigued by the idea of testing the same gun chambered in the larger 7.62X51NATO caliber. I can now report that the IWI Galil ACE in 7.62 NATO is as fascinating a firearm as its little brother, chambered in a true battle rifle cartridge.

 

Like the 7.62×39 version, the “new” gun’s internals are, essentially, taken straight from the traditional Kalashnikov design. If you’re familiar with the AK/AKM-47/74, the NATO-chambered rifle won’t present any maintenance difficulties or manual of arms-related challenges.

The most obvious difference: the reciprocating left-side charging handle. It’s a difference without a distinction; after running the Galil and a traditional AKM-47 side by side I doubt that it speeds-up reloads.

The sliding cover that keeps dust out of the action (when you’re not working the charging handle) and the gasket that seals the upper dust cover are excellent at keeping out the elements.

IWI has always had the challenge of creating guns to run in both urban environments, as well as heavy sand and heat. With the Galil ACE’s weather-stripping, they’ve done exactly that, out AK-ing the AK for durability.

The rifle boasts a 16-inch chrome lined, cold hammer forged barrel. I generally prefer a 20-inch barrel on a .308 rifle. That has nothing to do with accuracy, and everything to do with the wind.

All else being equal, using a 168gr Amax round, assuming 10 mph full value wind, I have to adjust for four more inches of wind at 800 yards with a 16″ barrel vs. a 20″ barrel. The longer barrel also delivers 50 more yards of supersonic travel.

As I regularly prove to myself, I’m not good at wind calls — I’ll take any advantage I can get. Yes but– while the extra oomph aids predictability, it really doesn’t come into play until almost 1,000 yards.

All that said, this is a Designated Marksman rifle. While 800 yards is a stretch, 16″ seems an ideal length for this gun’s intended role.

Just like the 7.62 NATOs smaller cousin, this rifle retains the same awkward safety set up. There are safeties on both the right and left sides, but they’re not ambidextrous.

On the left side of the receiver is a pull/push safe to fire safety that’s manageable with your right-hand thumb. It was pretty stiff to start, but loosened up nicely with some work. Most right-handed shooters who are used to an AR go right to that without any problems.

FWIW I had three former IDF soldiers put rounds through the gun. They all found this safety and used it without issue.

The other safety is on the right side of the receiver. It’s higher, farther out and very stiff. For a left-handed shooter, it’s practically worthless. It’s just too far away to reach with your thumb.

Like everyone else who tried to use it, I assumed you use it with your firing hand’s index finger. But it’s far too stiff to flip off with your finger. No one firing it could use their index finger to put it back on.

Then I had foreign-born friend shoot the rifle. (Israel doesn’t “exist” where he’s from.) He picked up the Galil and slapped the right side safety down to the fire position with the palm of his hand, just like on an AK. Well then, that’s what that’s for.

It reminded me that this gun is in still an AK pattern rifle, with a few changes. The designers clearly kept that original manual of arms in mind.

As with the other version of the ACE this rifle gives you lots of options for mounting accessories.

The forward hand guards also serve as Picatinny rail covers, hiding 270 degrees of rail. With a push of a button the hand guards slide off to reveal plenty of space for forward grips, laser aiming devices, flashlights, bottle openers, tactical toilet paper rolls, whatever your heart’s desire.

Unlike the 7.62×39 version, hand guards fit nice and tight, and didn’t rattle or move during firing. Even during long strings of fire, the hand guards never got too hot to hold — something that occasionally happens on other AK pattern guns.

The only downside: the hand guards are a little on the short side. The grips don’t go all the way out to the gas block, forcing the user to choke up a bit. More than one shooter complained about the resulting ergonomics.

The adjustable stock collapses to the right side of the receiver. Just like an AK, the gun will run just fine in that position. I doubted that I’d ever need this feature in any of my AK’s — right up until I shot a huge feral hog running by the side of my truck, out of an open window, one-handed, with the stock still folded. Recoil aside, it’s a handy way to store the rifle.

Unlike some side-fold stocks, the ACE’s is well designed, making long strings of fire comfortable. It also includes a snap-on riser. Without it, the standard sights line up with a good cheek/stock weld. Once an optic was mounted, my face was far too low to see through the scope.

With a quick snap of the supplied riser — no tools required —  my head was back in the right position. The riser never came off, even through handling. But it was quite a challenge to get back off again without breaking the tabs that hold it on. I consider that a feature more than a bug.

The supplied muzzle brake on the Galil ACE in 7.62 NATO is stout and aggressive. I normally hate brakes, but it’s appropriate on this rifle.

This isn’t a lay down, fight from your belly gun. At least that’s not the intent. The ACE was designed as a fighting gun. For that use, you’ll want fast follow-up shots, and to keep that muzzle down.

The ACE’s brake does the job very well. Controlled pairs at 25 and 50 yards weren’t a problem, nor was seeing my round strike at 100 yards through an Atibal Nomad 3X12 scope. (Make double sure you have ear protection, it’s a loud one.)

Unlike the ACE’s little brother, the magazine insertion and release on the 7.62 NATO version is much more like an AR than an AK. Gone is the familiar paddle release behind the magazine. Instead, release buttons are positioned on either side of the magazine.

They’re easy to find without looking, and present an obvious tactile change over the rest of the receiver. The gun ships with one mag. IWI recommends Magpul SR25 style magazines. I had no trouble with the supplied PMag or any of those I had on hand.

The magazine well is generously funneled; blind insertion is simple. I kept wanting to rock magazines in like an AK, mostly because I was running this gun with a Dead Goose Society AKM-47 side-by-side for comparison. Even so, the Galil’s mag well funnels mags in smoothly. I never had a magazine fail to lock in or drop.

The trigger is a solid “meh.” The break itself is fine — a little heavy at just over four pounds — but fairly crisp. It’s the getting there, and getting there again that diminishes its performance.

It’s a two-stage trigger with a long take-up even in reset and there’s a little bit of squishy grit in there. Compared to a precision rifle it would rate a fail, but it’s certainly an improvement over the triggers on my service rifles. Not that that’s saying much.

I was once again impressed with the sight set-up of this rifle. It’s still the best I’ve seen. The rear sight has two settings: a small aperture for daylight and ,with a flip, a large aperture with tritium markings for shooting in the dark. There’s a thin post with a tritium insert at the front. In either bright daylight or low light, I got a great sight picture, delivering just under three-inch accuracy at 100 yards.

Even though the front sight is at the gas block and not all the way out of the end of the barrel, you end up with a slightly longer sight radius than you’d get a standard AK. That’s thank to the fact that the rear sight’s mounted on the dust cover, not forward of the receiver.

A two-piece rail runs all the way from the dust cover to the gas block. That’s great for mounting different types of optics — a big advantage over a standard AK.

Because of the gasket and retention set-up of the dust cover, it’s far more stable than a standard AK. That said, the mounting will never be as solid as it would be mounted directly to the receiver. So some accuracy loss is likely there.

The 7.62 NATO version doesn’t lock the bolt open on an empty chamber. If you’re careful, you can get the bolt to stay back on an empty magazine if you manually manipulate it. But it won’t stay back when you go empty during firing. You’ll know it’s time for a new magazine when it goes click.

As I expected after my previous review, 7.62 NATO ACE ran flawlessly. Four other shooters and I put over 500 rounds through the gun, from several different manufacturers. We never had a jam, misfeed, failure to eject, or malfunction of any type.

As with all of my reviews, I lubed the gun up prior to shooting and never serviced it again throughout the testing process. I shot surplus steel cased FMJs, Federal OTMs, Hornady AMax and Nosler Balistic Tip bullets through it. Both factory rounds and my own hand loads ran through the gun without any issues. Given the basic platform, I wasn’t surprised.

Like the Galil ACE in 7.62X39, the 7.62 NATO version is accurate enough. Using the dust cover-mounted Atibal Nomad scope, accuracy ranged from 1.4-inch to 1.8-inch five-round groups at 100 yards off bags, depending on ammunition.

The best-shooting round was the Federal Gold Medal Berger 185gr OTM at an average of 1.4 inches for four five-round groups. The worst was Tul Ammo’s 150gr steel case round at 1.8 inches.

I was surprised with such a low deviation among weights and brands. I’m sure that would have changed if I had stretched the legs of the cartridge a bit. I was a little surprised that the 185gr rounds actually fit the magazine. They did, but as you can see above, just barely.

It should be noted that this rifle isn’t a reloader’s friend. Put another way, it hates brass and seeks to destroy it.

The AK style bolt bent and marred many of the case heads. Upon extraction, each case was heavily creased as it exited the receiver. The crease couldn’t be fully removed during resizing, and the brass wasn’t safe to use again.

For those of you who don’t wish to hand load, the ACE is a great rifle. If Uncle Sugar was paying for my ammunition again, I’d take a 7.62 NATO ACE over my M4 for combat any day. It runs perfectly, shoulders quickly, and delivers a wide range of .308 caliber projectiles with better-than-good-enough accuracy.

SPECIFICATIONS: IWI Galil ACE 7.62NATO

Caliber:  7.62 NATO (7.62x51mm/.308 Win)
Operating System:  Closed rotating bolt, long stroke gas piston
Magazine Type:  MAGPUL LR/SR25 GEN M3 PMAG®
Magazine Capacity:   20 rounds
Barrel Material:  Cold hammer forged, CrMoV, chrome lined
Barrel Length:  16 inches
Overall Length:  36 inches (buttstock unfolded and collapsed)
Weight:  8.7 lbs. w/o magazine
Rifling:  Right hand, 1:12 inch twist
Sights:  Adjustable with Tritium front post and 2-dot Tritium rear aperture.
MSRP:  $2,099

 

Ratings (out of five stars):

Style and appearance * * *
It looks like a stout battle rifle, as it should. As far as aesthetics, absolutely nothing seems to “flow” on this gun. The colors of the metal and the furniture don’t quite match.

Ergonomics * * * *
This is a weird gun, designed to be usable for people familiar with both the AR and the AK. For that, it accomplishes its task well. But that also means some compromises.

Customization * * * * *
This rifle comes from the factory ready to hang accessories. The standard sights are great, but a top rail makes it easy to mount a myriad of optics. The included cheek riser means you can actually use them.

Accuracy * * * * 
For a battle rifle designed for stand-up fighting and the occasional use as a Designated Marksman Rifle, it does a great job. Every round shooting under 2 MOA is better than any of my service rifles. With decent ammo, groups closer to 1.5 inches at 100 yards is fine shooting.

Reliability * * * * *
This gun ran everything I, and several other shooters, could throw at it.  Zero issues.

Overall * * * *
Just like everyone else who shot it, I really enjoyed this rifle. It gives the user a ton of options. As an autoloader chambered in 7.62 NATO, this could very much serve as your “one gun.” Points off for a mediocre trigger, not hitting the 1 MOA mark on accuracy, and for brass demolition.

31 Responses to IWI Galil ACE in 7.62 NATO: Gun Review

  1. Any idea on why it’s damaging casings on extract?

    That seems like a big flaw for a decent portion of the gun buying public.

    • HK’s series of roller-delayed rifles all beat brass to snot. You CAN reload it, but not without a lot of cussing.

    • Probably bouncing it off the rear of the ejection port. The Tavor dents brass, too, by bouncing it off the square-edged brass deflector.

      …sounds like the ejector and extractor aren’t nice to the brass either, though haha

      • Your explanation for the dent makes perfect sense. I hadn’t really considered the ramifications of an AK style bolt operating behind an ejection port rather than “creating” the port as the bolt moves backwards. (I was thinking about toast.)

        Seems like the Israelis decided on a forceful ejection system and prioritized that over other considerations… Which makes total sense based on their needs and environs.

        • Yup, Jeremy beat me to it. If you are going to ensure reliable ejection with this kind of system there’s really no way around smacking the ejection port on the way out. I guess they could round off or add some extra metal to the back of the port to increase the surface area that the brass was slapping against, but that’s not a very elegant solution.

        • Better than the people who stick a square of cushy weather stripping onto the brass deflector of their Tavor to prevent brass dents hahaha

    • Given who designed the gun, it might be a feature … “found” brass from this gun can’t be safely reloaded by people who might not like you.

    • The more expensive the gun, the bigger the flaw. I’d struggle to put crappy steel case ammo through a nearly $2K gun to save on costs.

    • My 308 Veprs do the exact same thing to brass.

      Well, that and flinging the brass practically into the next time zone. They are on a mission to never see that brass again.

  2. Left-side charging better for righties (ie most of us). The AK’s right-side charging is a throwback to the era of bolt-guns where soldiers worked the action of their rifles with the right hand. I personally always hated the ‘AK roll’.

  3. that’s pretty kick ass. 8 1/5lbs.
    when you’re done playing with cheap ammo.
    grab this. right up there with an m76?

  4. Why not just get a SCAR17S for that money? Got mine as part of MIL/LE promo at the LGS. Only cost me $2300.

    • “For that money.” Seriously? The SCAR 17S has an MSRP of $3,349. You can’t compare some special Mil/LEO promo blowout sale price on it to the full MSRP of $2,099 on the other. Seriously, what is it with people comparing lowest-price-of-the-year on one gun to MSRP on another?

      Brownell’s everyday (non-sale) price on the .308 Galil is $1,889 (link). It’s $2,899 on the SCAR 17S. At normal prices it’s a thousand dollars more expensive! AKA 53% more.

      I don’t think I’d agree that the SCAR is a better gun, anyway. I do like that the Galil uses less expensive, SR25-fit magazines.

    • Because $2099 is the MSRP not the price in the wild. Almost everywhere that has them in stock has them for almost $200 less then that. Atlantic Firearms for example is advertising them at $1889, and if you add it to the cart it drops to $1714.

      https://www.atlanticfirearms.com/component/virtuemart/shipping-rifles/iwi-galil-ace-rifle-7-62×51-detail.html?Itemid=0

      So versus a $2300 SCAR (which I think is a pretty rare low price I usually see them for $2500-$2700 in the wild) $580 savings could buy you a lot of ammo or a nice optic.

    • Because not everyone qualifies for that discount, but even with it it’s more expensive?

      • Cops are parasites in so many dimensions. Gun discounts. Food discounts. Coffee discounts. Big salarys. Big health care. Early retirement. Big pensions. More and more budget. Back the Blue! Or else.

  5. I don’t see why you couldn’t reload that brass – if you full-length resize, you should feed without issue and any crease that remains will be immediately fire-formed to the chamber upon ignition. I’d definitely toss the worst offenders, but if you’re just reloading to save a few bucks, that brass is fine. This isn’t exactly a rifle you’ll be expecting 1/4 MOA groups with.

    • I actually did full-length resize a couple dozen cases. Upon inspection I was still pretty concerned with the possibility of case rupture.

  6. I get why our military went with a 5.56. Cheaper rounds, lighter rifles, easier to transport, higher capacity magazines, ect. But there is something about shooting a stronger power rifle… like driving a fast car, or jumping out of an airoplane that is just sweet feeling. But alas, I can barely afford the current $430(ish) deal on the C308s up on gunbroker. Perhaps one day I’ll get an IWI Tavor or an AR10 or a SCAR17S. Until then, here’s to dreaming.

  7. H&K once made a case buffer for their 91 and 93 rifles. It snapped on to the receiver. It had a rubber tip that prevented spent cases from being dented. The spent cases were still very dirty from the fluted chamber.

  8. More than a few people raise the same question about those short handguards. Not like they want comp-AR-style keymod-tube from here and up to the muzzle brake. Still there is something fundamentally wrong with a handguard so short that a large man might face a real threat of getting some palm burns (and to echhi crown – stfu! :-D) for free.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *