First Impressions: New Colt Cobra

The original snake guns from Colt were high-polish, hand fitted masterpieces. The smooth feel of the trigger pull was matched only by the exquisite exterior finish. Discontinued in 2005, it remains one of the highest requested line of firearms to be brought back from the graveyard. New for 2017 Colt has heard the people’s request and is giving them what they want.

Well, in name anyway.

One of the earlier versions of the snake line to be retired (1981 to be exact) the Colt Cobra is a revolver designed for the concealed carry and law enforcement market. The new Colt Cobra is in that same vein, and while it bears the same name and specs as the original it falls short on a few key features.

The good news is that the trigger is great. Colt’s double action / single action system has been perfected over the years and this trigger benefits from their experience. In double action mode the trigger is smooth, and in single action mode the break is crisp and clean.

Great triggers aren’t the only thing that made a Colt Cobra famous, though. One of the defining features of the line is the hand fitting of parts and highly polished exterior, things distinctly missing on the new Cobra handguns. Stroking the side of the revolver feels less like stroking the slick scales of a cobra and more like a cat licking your hand. Instead of a high polish it looks like Colt went for a bead blasted exterior. That’s not necessarily a bad thing for a concealed carry styled handgun, but the better option for this specific line would be something similar to the deep blueing that came on the original guns.

Out on the range the gun shoots just fine, but apparently there’s still some bugs to be worked out since one of the test models they had jammed shortly before 11 AM and refused to work for the rest of the day.

I don’t have high hopes for the return of the Colt snake line. The machinists who made the guns what they were have moved on and Colt in the post-bankruptcy world might not have the cash to invest in restarting the line properly. I get the sneaky feeling that this is a desperate cash grab attempt from a company on the brink of insolvency and I just hope they don’t ruin what was an amazing line of firearms.

comments

  1. avatar DaveR says:

    Disappointing but not surprising

    1. avatar RW says:

      I was hoping for better reviews. I own a Diamondback and a detective, both are good quality revolvers. I have not seen the new Cobra. My guess is the the old Colts have met the same demise as the old Parker and AH Fox shotguns. If you look at the cost to produce a hand fitted finished American made shotgun your upwards of 3 to 4K. That’s far more than what most average income gun owners can afford. This is Colts attempt to produce a competitive product that the average Joe can purchase without taking out a long term loan. You’ll never see Colt manufacture a revolver with the same quality as the old snake guns again, it’s just not cost effective in today’s market…there’s always hope though.

  2. avatar jwtaylor says:

    I went back and forth between Nighthawk and Colt booths comparing the Cobra and the Skyhawk. But there’s no comparison. The Nighthawk, hands down.

    1. avatar Warren says:

      Will you give an in-depth review of the Nighthawk, please? (If you’ve already posted a passing review of it, let me know… I probably missed it in the deluge.)

    2. avatar Mmmtacos says:

      I don’t think anyone would assume that a $700 revolver would be better than a $1700 revolver. You may as well tell us you’d prefer a Nighthawk 1911 over a Colt 1911.

      I’m more interested on how this compares to Ruger, S&W and maybe now Kimber than anything else since that is more of where it’s priced at.

      In any case, I’m optimistic for Colt. Maybe reintroducing their Snake gun line will keep them above water. As much as it pains me to say this however what they need is a Glock contender. Yeah, the same ol’, same ol’ striker fired polymer affair. A new design, made in America to join the other plastic fantastics would actually be a boon to them I think. After all, it is what the market demands more than anything else, the name Colt still carries a lot of weight with people, and they could leverage that.

      1. avatar VerendusAudeo says:

        I believe the exact opposite to be true. What the market really needs is a good hunk of American steel. The market is already absolutely saturated with striker fired polymer wonder 9’s. The last handgun I purchased was a Smith and Wesson model 5906; it’s 2 1/4 pounds of solid American stainless steel that’s at least as old as I am and both looks and shoots better than a new polymer gun, at least in my opinion. I know every reviewer uses this stupid line, but it shoots like a dream. The way I’ve heard it, there are two easily defined camps: Sig people and Glock people; every manufacturer and their mother is trying to be the next Glock, but the Sig people have far fewer options. I think Colt, like Ruger to a certain extent, has the potential to carve out a great big place in the market if they double down on good steel. I mean, look at how successful Henry is in a market that’s saturated with ARs.

    3. avatar -Peter says:

      As a wheelgun fan, I’m also very interested in an indepth hands on review of the Korth offerings from Nighthawk.

    4. avatar emfourty gasmask says:

      >$700 gun

      >$1700 gun

      i mean, what the hell were you expecting? The Skyhawk to be equivalent to a Model 85?

  3. avatar Tal says:

    I’ll probably be investing my money in a kimber k6s.

  4. avatar Sean says:

    The finish looks like a car in primer. I just read that S&W is coming out with some new 7-shot 686’s including one with a 3″ barrel AND it’s chambered in .357 Mag / .38 Spl+P… Why oh why did Colt not chamber this roadkill snake gun the same?

    1. avatar Old Ben turning in grave says:

      I was thinking .44 spl. If you want a small revolver in 44, the Charter Arms Bulldog doesn’t seem to have much competition right now. But I suppose there would be a much bigger market for .38 (and .357).

      1. avatar nazshooter says:

        Ruger GP100 is now in 44 special…

        1. avatar Old Ben turning in grave says:

          Thanks, didn’t know that.

        2. avatar Frank in VA says:

          The GP100 is not small, though. Nor anywhere near as light as the Charter Bulldog. He is right about the Bulldog having no competition at the moment.

    2. avatar Big E says:

      3″ Revolvers are Pure Sex. And with 7 shots? Oh mommy.

      1. avatar Dave says:

        A Colt king cobra with a high gloss polish stainless steel finish two and a quarter maybe two and a half inch barrel I can’t remember I’ll have to open the safe and look at the Box but I have to agree with you it’s only a six shot 357 Magnum but it is sexy with original Pachmayr grips.

    3. avatar TexPatriot says:

      Colt has made it clear that this is the First offering. The new owners understand that abandoning the consumer market was a mistake. As they have more time, I would expect to see versions with a myriad of options.

    4. avatar TexasGearHead says:

      I own a 3in S&W 686+ which holds 7 rnds of 357mag/38spcl, so I don’t think that’s a new design from Smith. I’m pretty sure that particular model has been out for quite a few years.

  5. avatar Fred Frendly says:

    The new Kimber revolver at least looks great for the money. Colt CAN make high end firearms, their latest 45/70 custom Gatling gun and BAR 3006 semi auto version are works of art. And they still turn out excellent Gold Cup 1911s. Shame they cant put the same effort into reviving their revolver line. This Cobra looks like a Taurus.

    1. avatar Ryan says:

      Upon first sight I actually thought it was a photo from the Charter Arms booth.

      1. avatar Jeff K says:

        No, the Charters look better.

    2. avatar Will says:

      Actually, the Boys in Brazil are cranking out some really nice stuff nowadays. I’ve got a Tracker .44 that has the smoothest trigger I’ve ever felt on a revolver, and I’ve shot a Manurhin.

      Taurus’s biggest thing going for it is that they are affordable. When given a choice between a bells-and-whistles K6 for $800+ and a basic Model 605 for around $350, most would go with the 605, especially if they’ve got bills to pay.

      1. avatar James Earl Hoffa says:

        Tauruses triggers might be getting better but that’s it Taurus is junk with a capital j. We have stopped carrying them at our store because at one time they’re semi-automatics and their revolvers were coming back at least a couple guns a month to be shipped back to Taurus. They’re the only Gun Company besides Caltech that you you have a constant supply of firearms being shipped back to the manufacturer because of design problems and just poor quality parts. They can move that whole company to Brazil and keep it there for all I care trying to deal with their people in Miami you have to be able to speak Spanish most of the people there don’t even speak English correctly it’s like trying to explain the missing link to the person or to describe the Bible to him it’s like trying to translate a Bible it’s ridiculous if you’ve got a customer service department that is based in the United States of America how about you get some people that actually speak English as their first language how about that?

        1. avatar Dan says:

          It may not be the people in Miami who have the communication problem. The comment above does not have a single sentence without at least one grammatical error. In fact, that last conglomeration resembles a sentence only because it has period at the end. If you criticize the company because you have legitimate concerns about the quality of its product, fine. Forums exist so that people may enhance their knowledge with that of others. But if you criticize the company for its perceived poor communication skills, perhaps you should “sweep off your own porch before commenting on another’s mess.”

        2. avatar James Earl Hoffa says:

          I’m disabled combat veteran that was blinded in Afghanistan by an IED I use voice text and I can’t check my spelling very well or my sentence structure and I live in Florida so I think I know about the people in Miami a little bit better than you. If you have ever traveled to Miami and toward the Taurus plant it’s like going to another country South of the Border no one speaks English like a sweatshop

        3. avatar James Earl Hoffa says:

          And I really appreciate the crappy comments in the little side antidotes you’re obviously a younger person with s*** for brains

  6. avatar Z says:

    “The new Colt Cobra is in that same vein, and while it bears the same name and specs as the original it falls short on a few key features.”
    Are you sure about the specs? Everything I’ve read elsewhere indicates it is closer to the Colt Detective Special, steel frame and substantially heavier. (My ’53 Colt Cobra is about 15oz, spec sheet for the new model lists 25oz).

  7. avatar No one of consequence says:

    In my admittedly limited experience with various revolvers, the only one I’ve personally experienced that locked up (and not in the good revolverish way) was a colleague’s Taurus.

    And this one froze so bad it was rendered a paperweight on one of the brand’s most important days of the year?

    To me it sounds like Colt just released the Mustang II of the gun world. As the article says I’d love to be wrong about that, but indications seem otherwise.

    1. avatar Defens says:

      RE: Mustang II – that was my exact thought! And they had the gall to actually come out with a faux Cobra version of it, too.

      1. avatar Jeff K says:

        Yea, the Cobra version of the Mustang II was a cruel joke on wheels, a cartoon car.

  8. avatar Cozmolyne says:

    Acting like a spoiled brat if you ask me. This is Colt’s first time wading into DA/SA revolver market in over a decade. You’ve got to be out of your mind if you think they’re going to come out with a super-fancy, high-end revolver right off the bat, after filing bankruptcy. Just like if you’ve been in a car crash, you don’t go run a marathon the day after you get out of the hospital.

    Just give them some time. Seriously.

    1. avatar Defens says:

      Not sure that anyone is beating on them for releasing a revolver – but to place it in the same genus and species as their renowned snake series, instead of giving it a more generic name – is the issue. Folks expect a certain fit and finish from a Cobra, and by failing to achieve that, Colt is hurting their image much more than if they’d released the gun under a less auspicious title.

      Heck, my old Trooper Mk. III has a finer finish than this new one.

      1. avatar skoon says:

        How dare you disparage the trooper mkiii it’s the poor mans python and I love mine 6 in barrel and adjustable sights it’s a tac driver. And beautiful.

        1. avatar Defens says:

          Mine too! Not meant to disparage, but to point out that the “downgrade” Troopr looks a lot nicer than the new Cobra.

  9. avatar Steven F Clark says:

    I don’t believe all the Colt revolvers were great. They Python, yes, hand polished, hand-fitted parts that worked like lubricated glass. It was marketed as, and was, a PREMIUM revolver. My experience with other Colt revolvers like the Anaconda is that they were NOT premium handguns. There was a huge difference. Was that just my experience?

    1. avatar Dyspeptic Gunsmith says:

      Exactly. The other snake revolvers had OK-to-nice finishes, but they were not the Royal Blue of the Python. The Python was the pinnacle of the line, the masterpiece. It stood alone not only in Colt’s line at that time, but in American mass-production gunmaking at that time. I can’t think of any other gun from any other manufacture that got the level of attention and finish that the Python did in its heyday. You’d have to go back to the pre-Depression double guns of Parker, Fox, et al, and some custom-orders from Winchester’s custom shop prior to WWII.

      After WWII, the quality of American gunmaking took the first big step down, with Remington leading the way, and Winchester following them down the chute into the crapper. In that era, Colt’s Python was, in many ways, the last hurrah of the excellence that once used to be available in American gunmaking.

      The original Cobra wasn’t this type of gun – it had an aluminum frame and was a five-shot cylinder. It was supposed to be one of their lightest weight pieces available, and the blue/black finish on aluminum is, well, feh. It’s there, but we all know it won’t look like polished steel.

      The Detective Special was closer to what this new “Cobra” revolver is, and I have no idea why Colt marketing decided to muddy the waters with a name re-assignment like this. The original DetSpec’s in stainless were a bead-blasted finish, very similar to this “Cobra.” The blued DS’s were pretty nice, but not the Royal Blue of the Python.

      The finish on the original Cobra was rather utilitarian by comparison to the Python. The Anaconda & Diamondback blued revolvers had a pretty nice finish, but it was just a reasonable polish-n-blue job. The polished stainless finishes were nice, as were the nickels.

      There were even Colt revolvers that had a rather rough, completely utilitarian finish to them – eg, the New Service revolvers. That had a very rough finish. They locked up well, but their finish was quite rough by comparison to the Python. All Colts locked up tighter than S&W’s or Rugers, if done correctly at the factory. The lock-up on this “Cobra,” if they are using the original Colt lockwork requires attention from a gunsmith who knows how to time up a Colt mechanism to make the lock-up what Colts were known for.

      I wish I could take apart a trio of S&W, Ruger, Colt DA revolvers side-by-side and show people what’s really going on inside a DA revolver, and what is required to get the timing right. Once people would see that, you’d see why just saying “Oh, we’re going to make them on CNC machines!” isn’t going to quite cut it with the original Colt lockwork design. Making the parts on CNC, EDM or MIM machines does, however, more than suffice in a S&W or Ruger.

      Only the Python and the custom shop got the extraordinary level of attention that the author is thinking of here.

      The problem here is that many of the writers at TTAG haven’t been around enough guns that aren’t made from injection-molded cheez-whiz in their lives. They need to handle a lot more guns from the “BG” (Before Glock) era.

      1. avatar Lib lurker says:

        Great informative post, thank you. I wish you could show them too, I don’t understand revolver timing at all nor the colt difference

        1. avatar Dyspeptic Gunsmith says:

          Here’s the first clue for everyone:

          Look at which way the cylinder rotates. The S&W’s rotate out of the window. Colts rotate into the window.

          Now sit down and ponder what that means for how “solid” the lockup feels.

      2. avatar Geoff PR says:

        “I wish I could take apart a trio of S&W, Ruger, Colt DA revolvers side-by-side and show people what’s really going on inside a DA revolver, and what is required to get the timing right.”

        That is a video I would *love* to see.

        If you’re short a demonstration gun, perhaps RF could beg, borrow, or swipe an example he could slide your way for that video… ?

      3. avatar TexPatriot says:

        Great post.

        I have been looking to add a Colt Revolver to my collection for a few years. Even adjusting for age, the finish on the New Cobras (as described in the review) would be better than the Old Cobras (even adjusted for age/wear) I have seen. Every one I have found was nothing like a Python.

        As for the old Detective Specials:
        – the Chrome versions seem out of place today
        – the blued versions weren’t especially great.
        – I haven’t found a stainless version of the old Detective Special.

        The New Cobra seems like an updated Detective Special.

  10. avatar Dave says:

    I was a big Colt snake gun revolver man in the early nineties. I had a Colt King Cobra in 357 Magnum a Colt Anaconda in 45 Long Colt and a couple of Colt pythons 1 in 4 inch 1 in 6 inch. The reason why I purchased these besides being a Colt fan fanatic was the simple fact that they were assembled by gunsmith not gun techs on a huge assembly line. Colt being in the situation financially that they are would have made much more money had they built the guns the way they were built before the dawn of the Glock back when gunsmith actually assembled firearms and hand fit things that were a little rough to make sure they’re perfect before they leave the doors. I agree with the writer of this story on what the quality of these guns is probably going to be or their lack of. Colt a message from a customer that you’ve had since the early 1980s please hire some gunsmith and have a revolver line that was made exactly the same way you’re early guns were. You’re going to have to charge more money because of the Gunsmithing and hand fitting that is required to build a quality revolver but that’s the way of life. You really shouldn’t have built these pistols if you actually hope to stay in the gun industry without total failure. Bean counters were the reason why you went bankrupt the first time don’t you think you might want to listen to the people who purchase your products? To make the guns royal blue and perfect is not a hard thing to do it’s simply tumbling the parts until you get the finished you need to apply the bluing. And don’t think Colt has gotten rid of all those guys that made the pythons and the anacondas and the cobras and king cobras because there are still working for Colt you can still get your eighties model python refinished in a royal blue and it does look amazing. However it is not cheap to refinish my original Detective Special in the royal blue bluing was $600 and they had to fix a small problem in the spring. But the gun look absolutely amazing just like the day I bought it in 1983. And this was refinished and repaired in 2007 so it’s been 10 years but I had sent another Colt back just recently and had the same bluing done they call it royal blue finish and it looks just as good as my 6 inch python that’s never even been shot. Colt can produce the old style pistols if they actually want to put a couple bucks at it but apparently from your review it seems that there CNC Machining all the parts and assembling them on assembly lines buy gun techs not gunsmith there’s your freaking problem Colt.

    1. avatar Fred Frendly says:

      Back in the mid 90s they couldnt give the King Cobras away. Bought a 4 inch stainless “high polish” one for 300 bucks around 93, left it in a closet forever, traded it in 2010 for an Arsenal SGL21 Russian made AK. Best trade I ever made.

      The Pythons were always desirable, the King Cobras and Anacondas were scorned for having transfer bar triggers. Never was much of a Colt lover but wish I had scooped up more of those unpopular snake guns in the 90s when you literally couldnt give them away.

      1. avatar Dave says:

        The reason why the snake gun revolvers weren’t selling very well in 1990 through the discontinuation of them was simply because everyone had made the jump from revolvers to semi automatic handguns such as a clock. This is a natural change in climate sort of speak. They finally got semi automatic handguns that would reliably fire right out of the box to be sold for less than $600. I remember the 90s like it was yesterday and I can remember seeing a lot of revolvers not just the snake series guns but Smith and Wesson Taurus and a half a dozen other ones sitting in the gun cabinets constantly collecting dust. The only reason why they discontinued them is because they were not selling. People are getting over the polymer Plastic Fantastic guns now and we’re reverting back to a cold piece of Steel a hog leg if you will. We simply have not had a large selection of revolvers to choose from when it comes to full size revolvers. So there’s been an opening in the market for somebody like Colt to bring back they’re snake guns and trust me if they can hit it out of the park on this one they will sell. Have you ever heard of the term the past repeats itself well this is exactly what’s going on people have been Auto crazy for the last 30 years now we want something else a little different and a lot of these new automatic handgun Shooters have not spent any or very little time behind the trigger of a big bore revolver. It’s something new to them and to anyone who’s never shot a revolver. Now I’m not talking about the 38j frames and all these new LC ours and things that are compact subcompact concealed carry revolvers on talking about the big boys in the only one on the market right now is Smith and Wesson still. I believe that if Colt can get their act straightened up this would be a good run for them. Just my $0.10 worth. LOL

  11. avatar Dave says:

    Is there any talk from Colt to bring back the other lines of revolver will guns?? Or is this their last-ditch effort at trying to make a buck off of something that seems to be poorly put together with a finish that you can get on a Taurus. Please don’t tell me this is what you think people want. I need a crappy built replacement model snake gun like I need a big hole in my head. Do us all a favor and don’t discredit the quality and craftsmanship that you once had by turning out inexpensive mass-produced garbage. Just my $0.10 worth.

  12. avatar Erik says:

    Ya’ll don’t live in real life. Whaaa, they named it something that was better… OK, well get this, probably 90% of the firearm crowd has never seen an original or if they did they didn’t know what it was. I don’t think it popped up in Call of Duty.

    Comparing a Colt t a Night Hawk??? As far as I’m concerned Night Hawk might as well be make believe. I don’t think my small town gun stores carry them. I don’t think I ever saw one in a big gun store unless, again, I had no idea I was looking at one. I lust at them on line but not a reality. Colt on the other hand is EVERYWHERE.

    Just be glad that another 1911, Glock or AR hasn’t been created. I’m thankful to see something not made out of plastic. Hell, before Kimber changed things up, revolvers were even plastic. And I thought the K6 was vaporware too until last week. A year before I saw one and the next day it was gone.

  13. avatar Greg Bell says:

    I guess you have to fill up space and sell clicks but coming out of the gate with a slam like this is a bit lame. So one of the guns locked up at range day. Big deal. I have seen Glocks fail to fire on the first shot out of the box. I have had the trigger break on an HK P7 during the first range session. I have had the cylinder on a J-frame bind after two or three cylinders. Running a hit piece like this because a demo gun jammed up during range demo day is silly and irresponsible.

    1. avatar ActionPhysicalMan says:

      That was the shortest part of the article and didn’t seem to be central at all. Should he have kept it a secret? Why are you so sensitive about this?

    2. avatar Geoff PR says:

      “Running a hit piece like this because a demo gun jammed up during range demo day is silly and irresponsible.”

      No, it isn’t.

      Greg, this blog is called “The Truth About Guns”. They call ’em like they see ’em, warts and all.

      I would expect a gun brought in by Colt as representative example of their work would have been gone over by them with by a fine-tooth comb before it was displayed.

      If a gun that was specially prepped and pampered by Colt failed, how many of the ones shipped to their distributors that did *not* get that special love and care are likely to fail?

      The Truth About Guns just did Colt a *huge* favor. Something isn’t right in Colt-Land with either the design, manufacture or QA of that gun…

  14. avatar uncommon_sense says:

    And Colt still missed the mark with the design.

    Anyone who wants a small (concealed carry) revolver can choose from Smith and Wesson, Ruger, Taurus, Charter Arms, and probably more.

    So, why would anyone choose this revolver over other offerings?

    First of all, I like the idea that they made it a bit heavier … but I think they made it too heavy. Those 12 and 16 ounce revolvers are too light. And 25 ounces sounds too heavy. How about split the difference at 20 ounces?

    Second of all, why not increase the barrel to 2.5 inches and get just a little bit more muzzle velocity and slightly better balance?

    Third, and here is the big one, why not offer it in .327 Federal Magnum with a 6 round cylinder?

    Fourth, offer a shrouded hammer variant as well.

    This describes what I believe to be the perfect concealed carry revolver. Not too small nor too big. Not too light nor too heavy. Barrel not too short nor too long. Substantial recoil but not uncomfortable recoil. Six rounds rather than five rounds. The option for a shrouded hammer. And the option to load from light .32 S&W and .32 S&W Long all the way up to .32 H&R Magnum and finally .32 Federal Magnum.

    1. avatar Al Bondigas says:

      You just described, minus the .32 calibers, an original 1950s-1960s era Colt Cobra / Detective Special.

    2. avatar Will says:

      Soooo….. a Ruger SP101?

      1. avatar Jeff K says:

        Absolutely; hands down winner. The SP101 is one hell of a gun.

        1. avatar Keither says:

          I’ve had a SP 101 since it came out – Very fine gun – BUTTT it’s made for a small-med. hand. Not so great for my ex-large hand. I’m hoping the new Pach. grip helps. I can shoot my K. Cobra much better & am hoping the new Cobra is a good compromise & hoping them to upgrade it. Haven’t seen any in my area yet! Yea, we need it!

        2. avatar James Earl Hoffa says:

          The Ruger SP101 was made for a concealment purpose a little brother to the GP100. If you have an issue with this SP101 being a little small try one of the new GP100 with 2in OR 3in carry Barrel it’s pretty dang small for a full size 6 shot capacity.

        3. avatar Keither says:

          Back to the Colt, I see where it’s finally making it out to a few ‘hands on’ reviewers (late June 2017). They seem to really like the gun with it’s special new grip design & larger trigger & trigger guard. I see that the extractor rod is still a bit short with the 2″ brl. & an occasional spent case hangs up.

        4. avatar James Earl Hoffa says:

          Has anyone found any of these for sale online brand new in box? I know Colt is a weird company when it comes to selling Firearms they want to only deal with authorized Colt dealers only. Does anyone think that they will continue Manufacturing the snake gun series into the king cobra anaconda and python?

  15. avatar Ralph says:

    I’ve shot Pythons and Anacondas galore. They are great guns. There’s a market for them today, and I’m surprised that Colt didn’t jump in with both feet, instead of teasing the market with a hideout gun.

    1. avatar Dyspeptic Gunsmith says:

      Yea, I don’t know either.

      Ever since they announced a six-shot “Cobra” I’ve been scratching my head. I just don’t get it. I guess I’m just too dumb to understand the brilliance of someone in marketing.

      I would have brought out a King Cobra, just to show the market that they could do the finishing correctly again. Don’t jump right in and try to replicate the Python, just come out with the King in an excellent polish/blue 6″ barrel configuration. Then come out with the Detective Specials again. Then re-start the Diamondback and Anaconda.

      Then when they’d gotten a feel for those, then do a test run of Pythons. Don’t make them generally available. Retain the allure of the Python by offering only a limited run every year. Make them utterly premium products – and sell them at premium prices.

      1. avatar Dave says:

        I agree with you that would have been a much better plan of attack. But maybe this is the first attempt at revolver building since the cancellation of the king cobra and Anaconda series. I would love to see a stainless king cobra high polish gloss stainless steel with a two and a half two and three quarter inch barrel offer with original Pachmayr grips. That would be the bomb.

      2. avatar TexPatriot says:

        I heard an interview by one of their guys.

        Gist of what I heard:
        – They started with compact revolvers because concealed carry revolvers are the biggest sellers
        – there are more models coming. Although he wasn’t entirely clear, I took his comments to mean that they would have more Cobra options soon.

        He didn’t say it, but I expect larger revolvers are coming.

        1. avatar Steve Clark says:

          Good news. Makes sense.

  16. avatar PROUD chicano says:

    This is what colt brought to shot lol.

  17. avatar GreenMan0352 says:

    Is there any word on when these will be released? I’m what you would call a Colt fan boy

  18. avatar Keither says:

    Why can’t the mfgs. see fit to give us a longer ejection rod in atleast a 2 1/2″ barrel shroud that’ll positively shuck out the cases (better even than my K. Cobra)? Install a nice large WHITE ramped-post front sight (better than my K.Cobra). Shroud the hammer to be nearly snag-free. Lower the cylinder release a bit. Give us a grip option with more meat in the web area just behind the hammer (like my K.Cobra). Give us the option of a nice fat trigger (like my K.Cobra). Yet in this new small Cobra frame.
    Add some Icing, Strengthen the cylinder & ream the chambers slightly so we can fire 38 Super +Ps to get a 125 JHP up to 1,000fps!

  19. avatar kevin357m@yahoo.com says:

    How Much does it weights empty.Is recoil the same than the Glock 17/19?

  20. avatar Jean-Claude says:

    Would it have killed them to polish the thing? Hell, TAURUS’s stainless looks better than that.

    How about a Smith and Wesson level of fit and finish, guys?

    That thing looks like a Charter Arms…

    I’m surprised they didn’t offer them in anodized colors to boot.

    FAIL

  21. avatar Keither says:

    Still wait’n. Where are they? Re-design Phase?

    1. avatar James Hoffa says:

      Yeah I would suppose they are changing some things I was there the day at Shot Show when they revealed that when it broke at the shooting range there was a bunch of chatter that I overheard people were not impressed. It was like an afterthought for Colt to do something like that.

  22. avatar Daniel Howe says:

    Interesting reading, I don’t believe any of it. I’ve carried a Taurus 605 as my everyday carry gun for several years and have never had a problem with it. This weekend I will have my new holster and will switch to the Cobra. You all need to put a Cobra in your hand and shot a couple hundred rounds through it before you start making all these claims against it.

    1. avatar James Earl Hoffa says:

      No one’s making any false claims here brother. I was at Shot Show when they released that turd. I waited almost an hour to shoot it and when it was my turn to shoot I got handed the revolver and I loaded it went to take my first shot and the cylinder stuck in between Chambers and locked up and even the cult Smith’s that were there couldn’t figure out what happened so they just put it away. Great way to show reliability and quality of craftsmanship the day they released the gun so that people can get a side at it and actually shoot it one of their seven test guns takes a dump. This would never happen if they would have followed the original blueprints of hand fitting the action and the parts that cause the cylinder to rotate such as the Paul and everything else that goes into making a revolver revolve. I wish Colt would come back with their snake guns but let’s bring them back the way they were originally created instead of this mass-produced mumbo-jumbo garbage crap. Like you said if I want to junk revolver I’ll borrow a Charter Arms or a Taurus.

      1. avatar Keither says:

        I was just looking at an ‘Enhanced Internal Diagram’ of the new Cobra. The finger-tip on that cylinder advance lever looks a bit ‘DAINTY’. Cylinder lock-up? Was that from closing the loaded cyl. or when cocking to fire? Just thinking!

        1. avatar James Earl Hoffa says:

          It made a solid click when I press the cylinder into the gun and I rocked the cylinder left and right to make sure that it was locked up previous to shooting. I fired the gun double action first shot cylinder started to rotate probably 15 degrees or so and the trigger stopped wouldn’t let me press any further and the cylinder stopped as well. So I set the gun down pointing down range and got one of the cult guys to take a look at it and he was a Salesman so he hollered over to one of the gunsmith. To gunsmith came over started messing with it and then started taking it apart at that point they couldn’t figure out why the gun locked up so they put it in a lock box and put it back with the rest of their gear. There was a few comments made by me to the cult Smith in a joking fashion about mass production of revolvers LOL. They laughed it off and got the defective gun out of sight as quick as possible but not before a bunch of us realize what was going on and reported it to our friends and I believe the truth about guns had something about it too maybe in this article previously.

  23. avatar Kevin says:

    Colt was not happy with their original CNC shop and switched after finding a machine shop with state of the art machines and equipment that could fit their needs better. These guns are now held to extremely tight tolerances and Colt isn’t shy about rejecting even the smallest flaws. The aqua blast finish isn’t my favorite, but looks pretty nice in person. There have been quite a few revisions and improvements since the first run. Definitely worth checking out.

  24. avatar Rod D. says:

    The above posters that wondered why Colt couldn’t come out with a polished, blued finish like the old ones maybe don’t understand what it takes for skilled craftsmen to get that finish. You can’t just throw the parts in a tumbler and be good to go. The craftsmen who polished the Pythons used more than THIRTY different buffing wheels and various compounds to just prep for the blueing process (which has been changed by EPA regulations since the old days). At $699 MSRP, that type of blued finish just isn’t possible these days. At least the current vapor blasted finish (or whatever they’re using) doesn’t look nearly as rough as the Parkerized Agent and Commando Special guns of the 1980s strike-era when the few craftsmen capable of creating that Royal Blue finish were not available in enough numbers to handle the lower profit margin D-Frame revolvers (Python and Gold Cup models took priority). The Detective Special I carry is probably only an 85% finish gun; that’s why I carry it. Leather, nylon, or Kydex holsters, it does’t matter; you’re going to get finish wear. It doesn’t make sense to market a gun for concealed carry but take the time, effort, and money to put a beautiful, but delicate finish on it. Colt made the right call on the finish, anyway.

    1. avatar James Earl Hoffa says:

      Actually about 4 years ago I had a customer’s royal blue python finish redone by Colt. Not sure if they still do it but the price was over $570 how to redo the finish on a 6in Colt Python royal blue but when we received it back it was absolutely amazing but still very expensive. I’m pretty sure Colt got rid of their custom shop so now who knows you probably can’t get it done anymore.

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email