Radicals Say Ohio State Muslim Terrorist “Wrongly Killed By Police”

Muslim terrorist on list of people wrongly killed by police

The Ohio State University Coalition for Black Liberation claims the terrorist who attacked OSU students shouldn’t have been killed by police.  The social justice warriors (SJWs) added the terrorist’s name to their list of “persons of color wrongly killed by police” at a recent rally on the Buckeye State campus.  Oy!

Did they really name a homicidal jihadist to a list of supposed victims of bad policing?   They did.  It gets better though.  They recast the Muslim terrorist’s attack upon Western Civilization as an expression of “feelings of anxiety related to how he was perceived as a Muslim”.  As such, they say the terrorist shouldn’t have been killed by police.  Nevermind how he tried to slash and stab his fellow students to death.  They protesters claimed that “justice and due process don’t come from a cop’s bullet.”

Associate Professor of English Pranav Jani added: “You can understand where an act of violence comes from without condoning that act of violence.”

While everyone is entitled to their opinion, that sure sounds like some weapons-grade stupid on display by the Ohio State University SJW crew.

Terrorist enabler

Stephanie Clemons Thomposon

Ohio State has plenty of other social justice warriors on staff, including Stephanie Clemons Thompson, an assistant director of student life, who attempts to wrap a veil of compassion around the Muslim terrorist in a Fcebook post.

A Facebook post allegedly by Stephanie Clemons Thompson, assistant director of Residence Life at Ohio State. Screenshot by: Mitch Hooper | Engagement Editor The Lantern

 

This “justice and due process doesn’t come from a cop’s bullet” is very similar to Justin Curmi’s HuffPost piece earlier in the year where he proclaimed self-defense illegal:

The main problem with the notion of self-defense is it imposes on justice, for everyone has the right for a fair trial. Therefore, using a firearm to defend oneself is not legal because if the attacker is killed, he or she is devoid of his or her rights.

A great majority of Americans would no doubt take issue to the feeble-minded idea that self-defense is improper because it deprives a violent attacker of due process rights.

 

comments

  1. avatar jwm says:

    Is that chris mallory and more dead soldiers in that first picture?

    1. No, that’s definitely the Oompa Loompa from the newer Choclate Factory movie, on the left.

      1. avatar jwm says:

        For sure looks like a ball chinnian.

        1. avatar NineShooter says:

          Heh! MIB FTW!

    2. avatar Rodd H says:

      The one on the left is wearing a women’s jacket with poofy shoulders. But that cannot be a female.!

  2. avatar NYC2AZ says:

    Sounds like Abdul stabbed the wrong people. Think about it as a win-win. These SJW’s seem more than willing to be the victims and then regular people don’t have to feel sorry for them getting stabbed.

    1. avatar former water walker says:

      Oh man you took my thought…?

    2. avatar Ralph says:

      “Sounds like Abdul stabbed the wrong people.”

      Ha!

      Maybe that cop just shot him too soon.

    3. avatar 16V says:

      “Wrongly killed by police…”

      Never should have required waiting for the police. He should have been happily gunned down by armed students.

  3. avatar Dickie J says:

    Libtards gonna libtard.

  4. avatar Ralph says:

    Oooooooooooooo, Stephanie Clemons Thompson is going to unfriend some people! How will they ever fvcking survive!

    Do you realize was “unfriend” means? It means that somebody was once a friend of that monument to affirmative action, Stephanie Clemons Thompson. My god, people, how could anyone be that stupid?

    Oh, wait. It’s Ohio State. That explains everything.

    1. avatar nativeson says:

      Something tells me that this affirmative action queen and the SJW/black supremacists would have been much happier had the Muslim terrorist killed the white cop…instead of vice versa.

      1. avatar Ralph says:

        Yes, but the narrative would have been the same — “Pity the poor Muslim terrorist. He was driven to kill.”

      2. avatar Chris Morton says:

        In an email, I asked Ms. Stephanie Clemons Thompson whether she was similarly sympathetic to Dylann Roof deserved similar sympathy.

        No response yet…

        1. avatar FedUp says:

          Only if he were a Buckeye…

        2. People like her run away from the tough questions, just like people like Ernst Zundel run away from the tough questions.

    2. avatar Cloudbuster says:

      Ohio State was a lot more sensible than many universities at the height of the BLM protests. The special snowflakes occupied a building and started issuing their demands. The president told them flat out: be gone by morning or you’re all getting arrested and most likely expelled. They were gone by morning.

  5. avatar FedUp says:

    Makes me wish the terrorist had survived long enough to knife the SJWs who are complaining that he’s dead.

  6. avatar Katy says:

    Wonder what would happen if someone tried to explain the thought processes that lead some men to rape, and the pain they must be in to see that as their only option.

    1. avatar Red in CO says:

      Wow. That is a really good analogy!

    2. avatar Roymond says:

      Superb parallel!

      I wonder how they feel about the white shooter who was in “such pain” he went to a Bible study and shot some black people? Does he deserve compassion, too?

      1. avatar 16V says:

        White people are not really gonna win at the oppression Olympics. Despite the fact that they’re the only legally oppressed people in the USA.

        1. avatar YaYouKnowMe says:

          +1 billion.

        2. It is almost as if they hold white people in the same high regard that Adolf Hitler and company held Jews.

      2. avatar Chris Morton says:

        I asked Ms. Stephanie Clemons Thompson exactly that in an email when the news first broke.

        No reply so far…

  7. avatar uncommon_sense says:

    Those statements from those people should dispel any doubts, once and for all, that Progressivism truly is a mental disorder.

    If Progressives want to be that stupid and fall on their own sword, so be it. The rest of us, the actual adults in the room, will be responsible and do what actually needs to be done.

    1. avatar Roymond says:

      New defense tactic for mass shootings: throw the overweight liberal chicks out as bait; when the shooter turns on them, take him out.

      More peace will be had by all.

      1. avatar 16V says:

        …overweight liberal chicks…

        Now, now. It’s only most of them. There are some skinny hotties, at least until you hear them speak their mind…

        1. avatar Pwrserge says:

          The blue hair is a sign. Read the sign. If it has a color that does not occur in nature, don’t eat it or pork it.

  8. avatar Stusherman says:

    Guess the cop didnt ask him, “Pretty Please” enough times for him to put the knife down. All his fault /sarc!!

  9. avatar tjlarson2k says:

    Wow, when SJWs and liberals sh*t the bed, this is what it looks like. I hope they do this more often as it highlights the stupidity / insanity of the anti-gun, hoplophobic, pro-radicalism agenda.

    This is a godsend to the uninformed and fence sitters and highlights the purpose and relevance of the 2A.

  10. avatar Troybilt says:

    If I remember right Mike Bloomtard’s group No More Names put the Boston Marathon bombers on the list as gun violence victim a few years back.

    1. avatar NineShooter says:

      You are correct; I was scanning the comments for this very item, prior to posting it myself.

      This isn’t the first time Loony Lefties have tried this, only the latest.

  11. avatar barnbwt says:

    “Those who stand for nothing, will fall for anything”

    This is what happens when virtue signaling by people without a clue as to why they do so, is reflected upon itself ad-infinitum. I can see it now, the pre-game meeting by the rabble-rousers;
    “Those evil cops!”
    “Yeah, they sometimes abuse their authority!”
    “Yeah, like that one time blah-blah got blah-blah’ed!”
    “Yeah, I say the evil cops *always* abuse their authority!”
    “Yeah! Everything they’ve ever done is prejudiced!”
    “Yeah! Everyone who’s ever been killed by them must have been innocent!”
    “Yeah! Everyone! Which means that guy who went nuts must have been forced into it!”
    “Yeah! He had no alternative but to act out! Those evil cops were oppressing him! He was justified in killing us!”
    “Hear, hear! I say we make a point of including him in our demonstration to show how serious our opposition to police brutality is!”

    Throw in some amount of pot and/or alcohol and weak guys trying to impress easy girls, and I’ll bet it’s almost verbatim.

    1. And yet, they trust these evil cops to enforce gun control laws in an even-handed manner…

  12. avatar Jeff says:

    How the heck do you become this stupid?

    1. avatar Curtis in IL says:

      Not sure, but that Stephanie Clemons Thomposon lady is just so darned cute, she can probably get by on her looks alone. The rich guys are probably fighting over her as we speak. Future trophy wife, ya know.

  13. avatar Vhyrus says:

    SJWs talking about due process. That’s fucking hilarious.

  14. avatar GS650G says:

    If he was hacking on their ass I bet they’d want a little lead in his diet.

    1. avatar Keystone says:

      Doubtful. They’d likely be Kevin Bacon’s character from Animal House,

      “Thank you sir, may I have another?”

  15. avatar Hannibal says:

    “Associate Professor of English Pranav Jani added: “You can understand where an act of violence comes from without condoning that act of violence.”

    I tend to agree with that, actually.

    1. avatar Kendahl says:

      Understanding doesn’t preclude self defense.

      1. avatar Old Ben turning in grave says:

        ^

        This is the core point that needs to be made clearly. This is similar to the “penalty for rape isn’t a death sentence” argument, or equating legitimate self defense with vigilantism.

    2. avatar 16V says:

      As I do a whole host of other things. I ‘get it’, but it doesn’t mean it’s socially acceptable, or morally acceptable. “This isn’t ‘Nam Donnie, there are rules .”

      The part I find missing is “without sanctioning or forgiving from punishment”. As Sam Kinison said, “I don’t advocate violence against women in any way, but I know what turns Mr. Hand into Mr. Fist!”. Knowing ‘why’ does not get them frakkin’ pass.

      1. avatar anonymoose says:

        The rules are: you pull a knife, you get shot.

        1. avatar 16V says:

          Preferably before the first person gets stabbed.

        2. avatar Jordan says:

          And if they one of yours to the hospital, you send one of theirs to the morgue. That’s the Chicago way.

        3. avatar 16V says:

          As someone born at Chicago Memorial, I endorse this (movie) message.

  16. avatar Stinkeye says:

    Good lord. You can’t make this shit up.

  17. avatar tdiinva (now in wisconsin) says:

    Hamas has a term for this. They call it assassination in the field.

  18. avatar anonymoose says:

    Well Aloha Snackbar to you too, b*tch.

  19. avatar YZAS says:

    Ahh, I was wondering who Trigglypuff’s friends are. Looks like we found em.

  20. avatar scooter says:

    Attempt to harm me or mine and I will deprive you of your rights immediately and completely if I’m able. I promise.

  21. avatar Reality Check says:

    Here’s the thing… if you try to slaughter people WE WILL FRIGGIN KILL YOU. There is ZERO tolerance for massacres of innocent people, no matter what your religion is. If you try to kill us, we’re gonna kill you first. That’s how it is, and that’s how it stays. If he didn’t want to get shot, he shouldn’t have hit people with his car or stabbed them. If you do that, we will kill you.

  22. avatar Cloudbuster says:

    if the attacker is killed, he or she is devoid of his or her rights.

    I’d note that if the victim is killed, he or she is also devoid of his or her rights (for Christ sake that “he or she” construction is awkward and stupid).

    But that’s OK?

    1. avatar NineShooter says:

      Only if it’s a Lefty-approved cause, of course.

      Haven’t you been paying attention?

  23. avatar JJ48 says:

    Huh. I think we can understand TrueAmericansAgainstProGunAntiAmericans’ (or whatever username he’s using today) failure to see reason a little better now.

  24. avatar Fred Frendly says:

    The squatch on the left is rocking those Keds and faux leather jacket.

  25. avatar Cesare says:

    Poor pinhead jihadi shot down in the street like a dog? This is the thanks you get, first his anxiety was definitively cured, second it didn’t cost him one thin dime, and third nobody really took off the gloves and un-friend-ed him.These SJW types are all glass half empty types I suppose.

  26. avatar Andrew Lias says:

    This guy is playing a role in perpetuating the very stereotype he supposedly stood against.

    That said, this is my issue with movements like these. I have no problem with social justice for oppressed peoples, but lets not pretend that someone who would have killed every one of these protestors if he had the chance is a victim.

    I just can’t respect a movement that paints villains as victims and is blatantly racist. I mean, what if we asked these people about the Charleston tool bag. I bet that they’d have some radically different things to say.

    1. avatar Chris Morton says:

      They’re like neo-Nazis or Japanese ultra-rightwingers whining about “bombing of civilian targets” by the Allies… while maintaining stone silence about Shanghai, Chungking, Guernica, Warsaw, Rotterdam, etc.

  27. avatar Chris Morton says:

    Islamist: “Stop saying that Muslims are violent or we’ll KILL you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

  28. avatar Chris Morton says:

    Has anyone stopped to consider that it’s not impossible that the intended victims of this knife wielding, walking tumor had more sympathy for HIM than for the victims of Ft. Hood?

  29. avatar Mr. AR says:

    Is this similar to the charge of “resisting reparations” leveled against white people who defend themselves (or are killed/harmed) by black people?

    This charge was leveled (online) by a wacko “40 acres and a mule” site to explain away the brutal murder of a young white lady in my city by a trio of gin and juicers looking for some reparations.

    I’d agree to giving them a 230 grain mule kick over 40 grains of nitro-napalm.

    1. I wonder if this belief is more common than Holocaust denial.

  30. avatar johnny108 says:

    Personally, the wife and I are fond of 5.56mm justice.
    My dad is fond of 12guage justice.
    Why?

    Because justice does not come out of a cops gun.
    It comes out of a citizens gun.

  31. avatar Hooda Thunkett says:

    My only regret about that whole situation was that the campus cop didn’t get a chance to dip his cartridges in pig’s blood.

  32. These are the same people who whine about right wing terrorism.

    Yet, when confronted by an actual incident of right-wing terrorism, apparentgly it is okay with them as long as the terrorist says the magic words “Allahu Aklbar”

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email