Father With .45 Shoots Robbery Suspect Armed With .22 Pistol

bettys-barbque-aniston-al
The exact circumstances of this shooting in Anniston, Alabama are a little uncertain. One source says that Malachi Hicks, the robbery suspect, was running away when he was shot by an employee of Betty’s Bar-B-Q armed with a 1911 in .45 ACP. The Anniston Police Chief, Shane Denham had this to say [via annistonstar.com]:

Denham said Hicks was apparently lying in wait as employees were closing the restaurant for the evening. Hicks was armed with a .22 caliber pistol, Denham said.

“He forced his way into the back of the business and got that night’s proceeds,” Denham said.

Denham said that as the crime occurred, one employee ran out the front of the business to where his parents were parked to pick him up. Upon hearing of the robbery, the employee’s father grabbed a .45 caliber pistol, confronted Hicks behind the building, then shot him multiple time [as he attempted to escape].

The legality of shooting at someone running away depends on the circumstances and the jurisdiction. Texas, for example, has special provisions if a theft occurs at night on your own property, where a reasonable person would believe that shooting the thief was necessary to prevent the loss of movable property. In most states, you are within your rights to use deadly force if someone’s in the process of kidnapping an innocent.

Generally speaking, if a bad guy has moved far enough away that they’re no longer a threat, shooting at them is a bad idea. If you’re in a densely populated area, you might hit, injure or kill an innocent bystander. But there’s another situation where juries and prosecutors usually agree that shooting a fleeing perp is reasonable: where the the armed defender has been threatened with a weapon that’s effective at a distance. Such as a gun.

A good guy with a gun cannot know if a bad guy who’s threatened them with a gun who’s moving away is retreating or making a tactical move to get to cover or a better position from which to shoot. It’s not uncommon for criminals to fire backwards toward pursuers, to cover their escape. They are still a deadly threat.

We do not know how the prosecutor in this case will rule. Anniston is a town of about 23,000, home to the Anniston Army Depot, which employs 3,400 people. I doubt that the man with the .45 will be charged.

©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included. Link to Gun Watch

comments

  1. avatar Alex Waits says:

    I can see a lot of “scenarios” where shooting a “fleeing” suspect is justified. The most notable one is if the gun the robber had, was pointed at me, even if he was moving away. Seems like a good shoot, Id be interested in an update.

    1. avatar Alex Waits says:

      oh and the obligatory .45 > .22

      1. avatar mk10108 says:

        That had to hurt.

      2. Bet he remember taking off the safety

  2. avatar strych9 says:

    Legal niceties aside, getting shot was a risk the perp was running and I for one care not a whit for him.

    1. avatar Swilson says:

      Amen- if you rob a person/place and present any weapon when doing so, even if you are running away, there should be no civil or legal penalty against anyone for shooting you.

      1. avatar AM says:

        In hell holes like NY, the thief could probably sue you for shooting him.

        1. avatar AR says:

          “There are certain sections of Anniston, Major, that I wouldn’t advise you to try to rob.” –Rick, “Casablanca”

        2. avatar strych9 says:

          Well you could just stay out of the states that are behind enemy lines…

          However if you’re forced to live there it’s the Mozambique FTW. (Dead men file no suits, their family might but hey if I’m going down I’m taking that rat bastard with me. I might be broke, oh but I have carry insurance so I’m not, and your family member is still fucking dead! HAHAHAHA! Maybe if you raised better kids you wouldn’t be burying them so soon.)

      2. avatar Planet_Federal_Way_Twax_City says:

        Exactly, this isn’t tag. You don’t get to just run to home base after shoving a gun in my face. As long as the robber is moving freely and armed they are a lethal threat.

        1. avatar strych9 says:

          You could make it a game… Kinda like flashlight tag but with serious consequences for the losers. Maybe even mix in some kick the can…

          “TAG! You’ve got a GSW! Olly olly oxen free!”

  3. avatar Icabod says:

    There was a study that examined the time a person could turn, compared to the others reaction time to fire. The finding was that a person could fire, then turn to run, in the time the other could react and fire themselves. The result was a shot in the back.
    EDIT:
    Found the study
    http://www.forcescience.org/articles/shotback.pdf

  4. avatar The Gray Ghost says:

    Shooter will get a medal in Alabama. As it should be.

    1. avatar Don says:

      This was in Alabama, not Massachusetts.

      1. avatar The Gray Ghost says:

        Thanks Don

  5. avatar Honzo says:

    In many states attempted arson of a building, particularly an inhabited building, is valid justification for using deadly force (shooting). YMMV by state.

  6. avatar Hannibal says:

    If you have a gun and are in the commission or escaping from a violent crime (i.e. a robbery) you are a deadly threat, period. Action beats reaction.

    The lesson is, don’t go robbing people. I mean, one would think you wouldn’t need to be shot to learn that but I guess remedial karma is in session.

  7. avatar Frank says:

    Killed his soul too.

    1. avatar Doesky2 says:

      Nope, thats been dead for probably a long time.

  8. avatar RockThisTown says:

    Malachi Hicks, aka “Dances Fast Away From Wolves . . . But Not Fast Enough”

  9. avatar anonymoose says:

    In NYC if you have enough money and influence to get a legal gun then you probably have enough money and influence to get out of anything, such as shooting someone in the middle of 5th Avenue.

  10. avatar HP says:

    Knife? That’s not a knife. THIS is a knife.

  11. avatar Raoul Duke says:

    Good

  12. avatar JackInAlabama says:

    Alabama has a use of firearm to prevent a felony statute. This happened about 8 miles from me – don’t know the players although I did get to sit beside the police chief during a recent jury selection. Interestingly enough, the area (especially beside/behind Betty’s) would be conducive to shooting with a smaller-than-average chance of collateral damage, so there’s that. Also, given the usual societal issues and crime statistics, I found it notable (at least to me, take that however you want) that the bullet-catcher was caucasian! Guess at the very least we won’t be inundated with the BLM crowd.

    Take aways: Play stupid games, win stupid prizes!

  13. avatar js says:

    Uh… Anniston is home to the CMP range– the nicest range in the world that’s open to the public. (Look it up– I’m not kidding. “CMP Anniston”)

    They’re pretty much OK with guns around there. And what a treat to visit– basically a country club for shooters, complete with golf carts for hauling your gear.

    If TTAG hasn’t run an article about it– they probably should.

    1. avatar Pascal says:

      They have, just use the search

      Also, I have been to the CMP myself for a M1 Master Class and I remember driving by the place in the photo.

      Bunch of nice and helpful folks in the area even though I am a CT Yankee everyone was nice and I had fun chatting with everyone I met.

  14. avatar A Guy Named B says:

    I’d argue that the moment you use the threat of deadly force you’re fair game in most situations. Obviously the situation can dictate reaction….if there’s a crowd or collateral behind obviously you need to be smart…but there’s no guarantee that person doesn’t come back, threaten someone else, return fire, etc.

    Based upon some of the officer related shootings recently, I’d certainly say it’d be hard to blame a citizen for thinking someone who robbed them running around with a gun is a deadly threat.

  15. avatar Manny says:

    This wouldn’t be a discussion in any part of Europe. If you shoot an attacker, you go to prison. It doesn’t matter if the suspect has stuck a knife in your chest and is squeezing your neck while you shoot him.
    That’s why I prefer living here in the good old, “mean”, “gun-crazy” (according to euros) USA.

  16. avatar RetiredGuy says:

    Know the kid well. KARMA! It was just a matter of time. By the way, he has GREAT parents.

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email