Pic - webley 2.jpeg

(This is a reader-submitted review as part of our gun review contest. See details here.)

By Kevin DeCausemacker

I am a huge fan of curio and relic firearms, words like cosmoline and Bakelite get me more excited than they probably should.  Now, don’t get me wrong, I’d love to own the un-used Black Widow P08 that your cousin’s uncle’s half-brother pulled off an SS officer during Operation Market Garden, but I don’t have $15,000 right now. Not only that, I’m here to shoot. Holster wear, awkward actions, obscure designs, and a cornucopia of calibers just adds to the fun.

But beyond the mechanics of a firearm and the actual shooting, I enjoy the connection I feel to our collective past. Every time I shoot a 70-year-old firearm, I’m reminded of the often innovative, sometimes tragic, and always humbling path we took to get here.

Today, we are heading to post-WWI Great Britain. So throw on your time-traveling khakis, grab some fish and chips, and pour yourself a pint. My writing companion today is a Scotch Ale by Stone Corral Brewery out of Richmond, VT.  This one is easy to drink, packs a big malt punch, a little smokiness, and is a bit sweeter than I was expecting. (Please note: I have no affiliation with any brewery, but rather an affinity and appreciation for the hoppy and malty offerings that Vermont provides.)

Pic - webley 1.jpeg

History!

After the First World War, Europe was scarred and shaken. While the Bolsheviks were causing some trouble on the Eastern part of the continent, the British brass were evaluation their situation. The Enfield No 1 Mk III was getting an upgrade, and they also felt that something had to be done with their standard issue sidearm, the Webley Mk VI in .455.

World War I forced Britain to rely heavily on conscripted troops who had limited training. They believed that such troops were ill-equipped to handle the .455, so they changed up the cartridge. They went from a .455 caliber lead bullet weighing in at 265 gr. to a modified .38 S&W round. The new round featured a .38 caliber lead bullet totaling 200 gr. (thus the classification of .38/200 or 380/200).

Smaller bullet plus same velocity (we’re talking in the 600-700fps range) plus smaller gun equals OK for conscripted troops. Made sense at the time…I suppose. Eventually the bullet was jacketed and reduced to around 180 gr. or so (the rules set at the Hague Convention didn’t like soft lead bullets that expanded and stayed lodged in the enemy combatant).

Who better to design such a novel firearm than the blokes at Webley and Scott? I’m pretty sure the design and acceptance phase went something like this:

Webley: Hey guys, here’s the new revolver in the .38 caliber cartridge. Pretty sweet, right? It’s just like our Mk VI in .455, only smaller!

British Brass: Jolly good! We’ll test it out right away! Psst! Hey Enfield, can you make this exact same revolver only slightly different?

Enfield:  Sure! Here it is: The Enfield No 2 Mk 1. It’s different-ish enough from Webley’s design. (Officially adopted in 1932. Cool history on this revolver too…a story for another time perhaps.)

British Brass: Hey Webley, Enfield did this totally on their own without copying anyone. Terribly sorry, but we’re giving the contract to produce the military small arms to them.

Webley: Wankers. We’re totally suing for research and design expenses.

British Brass: Yeah…Don’t care. (They eventually settled with Webley.)

World War II Breaks Out

Enfield: Hey, a slight issue. Um, we’re having just a little trouble producing enough No 2 Mk I’s to meet demand…so… (They produced approximately 270,000 from 1932 to 1957.)

British Brass: -sigh- Good afternoon Webley, it’s us….do you think you guys could start making some of those .38 caliber revolvers?

Webley:  Yup. That’s kind of what we wanted to do from the beginning. Anyway, since we’re going to rush things a bit, we’re going to stamp “War Finish” on the left side of the revolver, just so people know this isn’t our normal, exquisite work. (They would go on to produce approximately 500,000 between 1932 and 1978.  Pre-war production was for police.)

British Brass: Great! We’re going to put a ton of markings on there too! Like “tonnes” and crowns and stuff.

How’s it work?

Ever since I saw Indiana Jones break open his revolver in ‘The Last Crusade’ I have been itching to try one. (Why was he carrying around a giant unloaded revolver?)

The operation of the Webley is quite simple. Put your thumb on the latch, and push:

Pic - latch.jpeg

Congratulations! Your revolver has been folded in half!

pic - webley open.jpeg

Now drop in six cartridges (.38 S&W please), hold the grip with one hand and the barrel with the other, and fold it back together. After you have punched some holes in paper, some more fun awaits. Remember that latch? Push is again to make all of your brass cases pop out of the cylinder (it’s really pretty satisfying).

pic - extraction.jpeg

Commercial .38S&W ammo is readily available online.  My local gun shop currently has one choice:  a brass-cased, 145gr LRN bullet from Prvi Partizan. I have been quite happy with this, though I plan to run some other brands through it as soon as possible. I’m also saving all my brass for the time I jump into reloading (really close to taking this leap).

I should, however, find another gun chambered in .38 S&W so I can justify a bulk ammo purchase. Or maybe I make the bulk ammo purchase first and use that to justify a new gun…decisions. A quick brass comparison of the .38 S&W with others (from left to right: 9×19, .38 S&W, .38 Special, and .45 ACP):

pic - brass comparison.jpeg

What are the other features you ask? This is a double action revolver, so you can either load it up and start shooting, or pull back the hammer and take some more measured shots. Trigger pull in single action is great (unfortunately I do not have a gauge…it’s on the long list of “stuff other than guns and ammo that would be neat to have”). In double action — I’m not going to lie — it’s approaching Nagant Revolver territory. Not quite there, but damn close. If you shoot more than a box in double action, you might want to think about icing your index finger.

The sights work, plain and simple. The rear sight is a notch, and at the end of the four-inch barrel there is a post. With this gun, you really don’t need anything else, it has proved accurate and consistent over around 250 rounds.

pic - sights.jpeg

The cylinder of the Webley has a little more play than your standard revolver (thanks to the break-open nature of the gun). This does lock up nicely once the hammer is cocked.

How’s it shoot?

This gun is not light. It’s made out of steel and stout-fueled English sweat (ew). Weighing in at 2.4 lbs. unloaded and 10.25 inches, there is minimal recoil. This allows for faster follow-up shots, and a really fun range experience.

Alright, I have to be totally honest. The below target is not mine. It’s my father’s. I’d love to blame the humidity, the wind, or the dude next to me with the un-lit cigarette in his mouth for about 20 minutes, but I can’t. My old man outshot me (three in single action, three in double action):

Pic - target.jpeg

I can, however, say that my less defined group was also low (all of this is measured at seven yards). This makes sense considering the 145 gr. ammo is about 55 gr. lighter than the ammo that this revolver was designed to fire. While my group wasn’t fantastic, I did have great success cleaning up bits of orange clays on the berm behind the target.

It’s a 70+-year-old revolver that points great, barely recoils, has been 100% reliable, and hits what I’m aiming at (if I do my part): What’s not to love?

Customization?

I’m glad you asked. Thanks to the Internet, you can find a variety of replacement parts and reproduction grips. You can even find a canvas holster. But seriously, this is where the gun shines: The Webley Mk IV .38 has a lanyard ring. This means anything that can have a hook attached to it can be an accessory on your Webley:

Pic - lanyard.jpeg

I was going to attach a My Little Pony, but I didn’t want to face the repercussions associated with putting a hook through Rainbow Dash or Twilight Sparkle.

Conclusion

The Webley Mk IV .38 is an accurate and enjoyable revolver. While it’s finish may be worn down, it’s soaked in history. You don’t buy this gun for competition or for self-defense, you buy it to feel closer to our collective past and to have a great range day with your dad.

Be careful when looking to buy one of these. Many retailers/sellers confuse this Webley and the Enfield of the same caliber. The easiest way to spot an Enfield is the different grips (assuming they still have factory grips and not some horrifying homemade wooden set that was painstakingly carved while have-in-the-bag in a garage with a dull knife in the dark).

If you see a bobbed hammer, you’re likely looking at an Enfield No 1 Mk 2* or Mk ** (the stars are important, just ask Google). Become familiar with the various markings on both the Webley and the Enfield and you’ll be able to easily spot the mislabeled listings on Gunbroker and incorrect tags at your LGS. Do your homework, be patient, and pick up a great example of each.

Specifications Webley Mk IV 

Caliber:                 .38 S&W
Capacity:              6
Weight:                2.4lbs empty
Action:                  Double Action/Single Action
Barrel:                   4”
Overall Length: 10.25”
Price:                     $350 to $500 average sales price on Gunbroker for a decent shooter

Ratings (out of five stars):

Accuracy: * * * *
Pretty darn good. Shoots a little low, but this may be corrected with different commercial loads or maybe some handloads that better meet the original specifications of the .38/200 ammo.

Ergonomics: * * *
Feels great in the hand, points naturally, and has minimal recoil. Nothing fancy, it just works. Double action trigger is a bear.

Reliability: * * * * *
No issues.

Customization: *
Lanyard ring. Options galore.

Overall: * * * *
A great range companion that, after a bit of searching, can be had a decent price. If it’s got history, but it sucks to shoot, it has to be really, really cheap for me to be interested. But this Webley not only made it through the Second World War, it’s also fun at the range.

Recommended For You

29 Responses to Gun Review: Webley Mk IV .38 Revolver

  1. Webley and Enfield could not make enough revolvers for the brits during the war. S&W made their victory model in the .380/200 and sent them over.

    The S&W had a six inch barrel and a solid frame and, at least in my opinion, a better lockwork. In my experience the Webley and the Enfield are perfectly serviceable revolvers but the Victory model is a better shooter.

    Still, I’ve always had a thing for top break revolvers.

  2. I have a nice postwar made Webley, 1953 or so, that’s marked for the Singapore Police Force.

    I also have a S&W Victory Model that is a wartime production.

    I reload, so I’m trying to track down the proper 200 gr lead bullet for them.

  3. I have two of these, one in .455 (not modified to .45acp) and one (with a lanyard and holster) in the .380-200. (Bought them 25 years ago when they were not quite as expensive.) Both are fun to shoot, although .455 ammo is a bit spendy. For the ultimate accessory, get yourself a replica Pritchard bayonet for your Wobbly (from Atlanta cutlery). Seriously, chaps, how can you possibly lead the troops over the top without a bayonet attached to your Webley?
    http://www.atlantacutlery.com/p-1564-pritchard-pistol-bayonet-reproduction.aspx

    • Cool thanks for the great link! I just have to find if it will fit my Web Mk I. Never know when you are in the woods and might need to both shoot something with a .455 and do some light (very) close range stabbing!

  4. Appreciate the reviews of the older firearms – love those milsurps. Your historical “conversation” was great – history and humor together made for entertaining reading.

  5. Best review I have read in ages, very entertaining and informative. Author should be on staff as a writer, should win the contest.

  6. Horrible trigger. Not a joy to shoot. Pissed my former father in law sold it to someone else than me. Not really worth owning anyway.

  7. Good review! And I have a strange and sudden desire to drink a Stone Corral Brewery Scotch Ale…

    I don’t know how popular reviews of old guns are on TTAG, but they’re some of my favorite content to read (or write).

  8. Wonderfully British! An ugly and clunky revolver in an anemic caliber. As the owner of two No 4 Enfields I want one just to round out the collection. If I’m going to play war in British khaki I’ll carry one of my No 4 Mk 2 rifles and a Browning Hi-Power.

    I wish that somebody would do a modern top break revolver in .44 special or .357 magnum. Design it for five or six rounds loaded with full moon clips. Totally possible with today’s metallurgy but nobody would buy one because it wouldn’t say Glock.

  9. My best friend’d dad has a Webley-Fosbery along with a standard .455 Webley, and I’ve wanted one ever since he first let me see them in high-school.
    Both pistols have been in their family since they were new and belonged to his great-great-grandfather back in Wales, who was a chief constable during WW1. He gave them to my friend’s great-grandfather when they emigrated to Michigan just prior to WW2.
    The Fosbery’s story didn’t end there; it was stolen during a burglary back in the late ’90s, was recovered, and somehow disappeared from the police evidence locker. My friend’s dad thought it was long gone, until about ten years later he found it for sale on Gunbroker. So he contacted the seller who was a pawn-shop owner, proved that it had been stolen twice, and it was returned free of charge post haste.

  10. While I have a .38 Mk IV just to fill the spot in the safe, my first Webley/Enfield was and is a 1926 Mk VI.
    As part of the British de-militarization in the ’70s, thousands had the rear of the cylinder faced off to take .45ACP in moons (well, half-moons, since that’s all we had in those days) or even .45 Auto Rim.
    I recall buying mine in a midsize Chicago-area gunshop in late ’73 or so. The price was $75. The shop had a box of them, and I picked mine out without a clue of what I was supposed to be checking.
    I eased the mainspring down a bit and just plain shot the thing for many years. I liked it with the old Speer swaged 250 grain wadcutter and a modest dose (I think) of Unique.
    Fast forward to the early 2000’s and I’d gotten hooked on USPSA action shooting. While I am by birth a “1911” guy- we called them “Colt .45s” back then- I did occasionally take a sixgun to the match just to change up.
    I had low-quality Smith 625 I’d bought new that gave nothing but trouble. One day I tried the Enfield alongside during a range session and found out I wasn’t giving much up with the Mk VI, and the Limey was more reliable.
    I ran about two seasons alternating between the L-10 .45 and the Enfield. In a truly shocking moment, I attended an all-classifier match and had the shoot of my life- I broke into “B” Class, Revolver Division with the old clunker.
    I’ve had a lot of adventures in action shooting sports since then, but no story beats making B with a Webley.

  11. I’m a small-time Webley collector now, I suppose: I have a proper .455 I never really shoot, because it’s the crown jewel of my collection and .455 is basically impossible to find these days. I also recently got a Mark IV, but it’s a bit of an oddball one: the serial number says it’s from 1964, and it’s a Singapore Police Force model. It has an ‘SPF’ stamp on the backstrap, and most unusually, a factory-installed safety behind the hammer.

    I’m going to be shooting it and my No. 1 Mk. III* at the next two-gun match at the local range, in mid-September. That should be a riot.

  12. Supposedly the .38 S&W was more popular than we realize today. I have even seen a Ruger Speed-Six in that chambering, although it sat on the dealer’s shelf for a long time. A U.S. Army field manual also listed the S&W revolver in that chambering, which, among other things, they referred to as “.38 regular.” Apparently they were used to some extent in American service, too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *