“A gunman who is believed to have been wearing Muslim dress was filmed chasing four teenagers past houses and parked cars before appearing to shoot one of them as they cowered next to a house,” dailymail.co.uk reports. “A daylight clip taken from a nearby balcony appears to suggest the terrifying situation followed a disagreement in the shopping centre as a seven-strong group of men can be seen dispersing across a car park as a shot and shouting can be heard at the beginning of the footage . . .

The gun-toting man then chases the four boys across a nearby busy road, forcing drivers to slow down as they swerve around the group . . . Metropolitan Police confirmed it was aware of an incident in Edmonton yesterday and said officers discovered no one injured at the scene. No one has been arrested and evidence of a discharged blank firearm was discovered.” Not so blank, eh Mr. Bond? This in the gun control paradise that is England. Who’d thunk it?

[h/t JD]

Recommended For You

42 Responses to Broad Daylight Shooting by Man in Muslim Mufti. In England.

  1. FWIW (probably not much) “mufti” in Arabic identifies a person (man) who expounds on sharia. Mufti in general English usage means “regular clothing”, not specific to a profession (a uniform). So, I guess it is possible for a mufti to be dressed in mufti.

  2. “This just doesn’t happen in other countries.”

    Presumably bombings at airports don’t happen either.

  3. But aren’t guns illegal in England??!?!? So this couldn’t possibly have happened because no one can break those laws?!?!?!? I’m confused!

  4. They we’re shooting a low budget Tookin 5 – Dindu Nuffin English Muffins. Starring Richard Dean Anderson. Nothing to see here, move along.

    • MacGyver hater? All you “need” is a Swiss Army knife…unless you’re in Great Britain. Oh, nevermind.

  5. I watched an interesting show called “Underworld Inc” on overseas ghost guns, recently.

    Families living in huts in the jungle were making fully functional 1911’s with old world gun making tech. Hand made guns out of blocks of steel.

    The guns (no serial number and completely untraceable) sold for $150 per gun and one family could make about two guns per week. As the guns transferred hands (unused) the price went up to about $2000, once it reached the States, which isn’t an unheard of price for a new gun in America.

    Once the gun was used in a crime, through ballistics it became traceable, and the price went down, accordingly, due to being “hot.”

    Then, once the price dropped to a rock bottom number, less than its first $150 price tag, it was shipped back overseas to another third world country. Once again, becoming untraceable, due to third world policing not having the resources for mass ballistic identification.

    The the ghost gun was made, sold, transported, resold, used (during crimes), resold, transported, reused (during crimes), and God only knows how many times this process took place and where. And one of those places the gun ventured was California, the banner state of the gunsense crowd.

    Gun control is useless in regards to criminality. It only stops people who give a sh*t about the rule of law. It only hurts the people who plan on sticking around for the police after a shooting takes place. The other folks, who don’t plan on sticking around, not so much.

    • Out of curiosity, does anyone know what parts of a gun leave a “fingerprint” discernible to the latest in forensics tech? “Run a file through the barrel and across the firing pin” used to be considered sufficient anonymization, but that may have been at least partially due to revolvers not leaving casings behind. Are there now ways to identify a gun based on markings on the case walls and/or case head, assuming you’re shooting an auto and forget to pick up your spent shells?

      • With my very basic understanding of ballistic science, I’d say barrel, mag, firing pin, extractor are the only ways to do it. But that’s just a guess.

        • Just based on general reading, it seems the whole idea of “fingerprint” for a handgun is predicated on revolvers. With the wide-spread availability of semi-auto pistols, simply changing out the slide makes a whole new gun. without a total gun and gun owner database, it is impossible to actually trace a gun to an owner, gun parts to an owner. even “micro-stamping” the firing pin is useless.

  6. “officers discovered no one injured at the scene. No one has been arrested and evidence of a discharged blank firearm was discovered.”

    UK Police say it’s all good when a Muslim is involved? Possibility of political correctness motivated cover-up? Glad you asked…

    • This stuff is no accident…

      You think all the Socialist (aka Commies) politicians invited hordes upon hordes of unvetted and undocumented migrants, which do not hold values and beliefs unlined with Western culture, whether secular or non-secular…then housed the migrants, help put them on gov’t programs, allow them to set up no go zones, and protect them by turning a blind eye to criminality and forcing “hate speech” laws to keeping from speaking out… And all this because of PCness and multiculturalism…

      Forgive me, but I have no problem donning my tinfoil hat for this one, my friends. The invasion of Europe is on purpose, by both side, the migrants and the politicians. The useful idiots are too stupid to realize what the politicians are doing, creating another generation or twelve of loyal voters for more Sociliat agenda, and also, a boogieman to scare the people in to giving up more freedoms. And the politicians are too stupid to realize once the migrants out breed the Westerner (generation or a few) they will begin the process of forcing their own Muslim Brotherhood politicians into power. And began the non-secular takeover of all things Europe.

      The only question will be if the Euros will wake up in time.

  7. Muslim this and muslim that. Ho Chi Minh could have only wished for this kind of tolerance to the North Vietnamese. I would also wonder what would happen if people dressed as catholic priest started bombing, killing, and terrorizing communites? Now is the time to arm the populace,”they” and you know whom I mean, need to fear walking the streat. Geore Bush and his “dont retaliate” after 9-11 was wrong. A message should have been sent to “them”. If I burn down a church, the sheriff and police come after me. If I burn down a mosque the FBI and Federal marshalls come after me. WTF. “They” can burn bibles American flags shout “Death to America” but let me tell one camel joke and Im pursecuted. Sick sick sick of what America has become. Teddy Roosevelt we need you, George Patton we need you.

  8. So, at least at first glance, this is most likely a 6 or 7 on one attack, and the defender chases them off using a cap gun, and he’s the bad guy. Because Muslim.

    • Ya, I’m thinking this was a beat down robbery broken up by an armed citizen….. Perhaps it should be in the DGU of the Day.

  9. Yeah from other sources it sounds like this is an incident of a man scaring off attackers with a blank firing pistol and not some crazed terrorist that so many racist morons here seem to want it to be.

    • Well, HFI, Islam is a religion, not a race. The proper term for such mindless bigotry is xenophobe.

      But wait, Matt Drudge is reporting multiple bombing attacks in Brussels by a man yelling in, Arabic with over 34 murdered and hundreds injured by those from the “Religion of Peace”.

      Well, just being honestly cautious about a particular group with a proven record of emulating a mass murdering religious psychopath like Muhammad, is not not being a xenophobe, it’s just being realistic.

      • Xenophobe!

        There’s the word I was waiting for…

        When you’re unwilling to allow third world unvetted migrants into your country by the millions… Well, unless you’re non-white.

        Because when the Saudis do it to the Syrians or the Mexicans do it to the Guatemalans, it’s cool.

        • Yep. When they do it, they are just properly defending their borders from illegal aliens,; law breakers violating the national borders of a sovereign nation; when we do it, we are being xenophic and/or racist, small minded bigots.

    • If I scare you off,you run away and I go back to jacking off or whatever ,then Im right. If I scare you off, and chase you down the streat, I have intentions of violence

  10. Obama said we just need more unity.
    Whenever some dolt tries to sell hugs as an answer to violence I always think of this girl:

    “I was petting it, ‘Please do not hurt me again. I will be your friend, don’t hurt me.’

    When that didn’t work:

    I thought I should just play dead. Then it just went away. I sat there and thought, ‘It is gone now, I am safe,'” she said.

    http://www.insideedition.com/headlines/6848-young-girl-pets-bear-to-survive-attack

    Playing nice = fail. Playing dead (giving it the outcome it desires) = success.

    Is it feasible for the totality of the civilized world to play dead until these bronze-age lunatics go away? Probably not.

  11. So was this a Muslim terrorist or,
    was this a Muslim defending himself against a gang of teenaged thugs?
    Inquiring minds want to know!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *