Self-Defense Tip: Shoot the Target of Opportunity

Craig Moore

At about 3 a.m., an unfamiliar man broke into Wilma Williams home in the 31000 block of Cleburne County Road 49 in Alabama. She ran to her pistol. The invader, one Craig Moore [above], was able to take it from her and fire twice before she struggled free. One of the shots cut hair from her head. Ms. Williams got away and called 911 and a neighbor, Charles Price. Price grabbed his shotgun and stopped to enlist his father in law, James Melton. Melton snatched a rifle. It was very dark on 15 August. The Moon was new, and there were no street lights . . .

Price ran to Williams place on foot. Melton, 76, took his truck. When he got there, Price had already been attacked by Moore, behind the house. Melton heard him shout, ran to his aid, and was able to knock Moore off of his son-in-law with a blow from the rifle. Moore attacked Melton. Price returned the favor, knocking Moore off of Melton, cracking his shotgun stock in the process. All three combatants ran toward Melton’s truck, which was still running. Williams now appeared on the porch. From annistonstar.com:

Moore then ran toward Melton’s truck, while Williams yelled from the porch, “He’s got a gun,” Melton said.

Melton ran toward his truck and took the keys out before Moore could get there, he said. That’s when he saw Moore aim the pistol at him.

“My son-in-law fell down on the ground and shot under my truck, shot twice and blowed his legs out from under him.”

That’s when the police arrived, Melton said.

The Sheriff’s Department supported the armed neighbors. Chief Deputy Michael Gore:

Gore called the two men heroes, saying if not for their aid Williams could have been killed or more seriously wounded.

I do not know if the neighbors had flashlights or other gear. It was a desperate, deadly situation. I was impressed by Charles Price’ tactical use of cover and targets of opportunity, once he learned that his attacker was armed with a pistol.

He dropped to the ground on the other side of his father in law’s truck, taking advantage of the cover and concealment that it offered. Then he immediately shot Moore in the targets available, Moore’s ankles and feet. Moore is lucky that Price did not follow through with shots to the body. Just because Moore went down, did not mean that he could not shoot. But the shots to the feet were enough.

 In a gunfight, shoot at the targets available. A hit in the ankle is better than no hit. Remember that many things people hide behind do not stop bullets.  The famous scene from the Dirty Harry movie, Magnum Force, illustrates this when Inspector Callahan shoots a hijacker through an airplane partition. Concealment does not stop bullets, but many never learned that or forgot it. Know what your ammunition will penetrate.

©2015 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.

Gun Watch

comments

  1. avatar FedUp says:

    Two shotgun blasts to the ankles, yep, that ought to at least pin him down.

  2. avatar JasonM says:

    That guy looks like he was born to take mug shots.

    1. avatar Rusty Chains says:

      Yep, that is what I thought looking at the picture, The only thing that would add to the impression would be a neck tattoo or two!

      1. avatar Taylor TX says:

        I imagine a mullet would be a great way to top it off.

    2. avatar Hannibal says:

      He’s looking down and wondering what happened to his shins.

  3. avatar pres stone says:

    wow, talk about thinking on the spot. i seriously doubt i would have had the mental capacity to think to do that. Its good that the lady is ok but i hope she takes this as a sign that she needs training.

  4. avatar Ralph says:

    After getting his legs “blowed out” from under him, Craig Moore’s defense won’t stand up in court, and neither will Craig Moore.

    1. avatar Mark Lloyd says:

      He will be just fine in prison on his hands and knees.
      Sorry….I just had to.

  5. avatar Noah says:

    Just from the description that sounds every bit as terrifying as any movie shootout. Good job thinking on their feet, too. It’s cool to know guys like this are on our side.

  6. avatar Todd S says:

    Wow. I hope I never have to do something like that and I pray that if I ever have to do it, I do it as well as these folks did.

  7. avatar CP Subventius says:

    Craig, if you have to steal something, steal a razor. You don’t want your monument to be a mugshots dot com of you with two days of sleeping off that meth.

  8. avatar BobS says:

    The antis, of course, will say none of this violence would have happened if Williams had not tried to use her pistol. This is a great example, they will say, of an attacker taking away the resident’s pistol and using it against her: he shot her with her own pistol, and nearly fatally.

    They will say this needless violence is all Williams’ fault for escalating the conflict by introducing a firearm to the mix. Another example of the dangers of having a firearm in the house.

    1. avatar Wood says:

      You’re not wrong. Let no tragedy go to waste, even if they have to tell only part of the story or outright lie. Dirtbag was definitely not a good boy getting his life back together blah blah bleat baaaa…..

  9. avatar Jon in CO says:

    Just goes to show, out in the sticks, help was a bit out of reach for this woman. Another good reason to know your neighbors too.

  10. avatar CHLChris says:

    “Know what your ammunition will penetrate.”

    This is why all handguns “suck” and rifles rule (when given a choice, of course). The answer to this question, when dealing with a center-fire rifle round is: almost anything.

    1. avatar tdiinva (Now in Wisconsin) says:

      Not every centerfire round. The dreaded 5.56 gets stopped by cinderblock, brick, metal. Materials that even a lightweight 243 will penetrate with ease.

      1. avatar Scrubula says:

        Which is good when you don’t want your rounds to pierce 3 houses before stopping.

        Chances of hitting a neighbor are less than getting hurt by the criminal IMO but mitigating those risks isn’t bad. Taking a shot without clear line of fire is always a gamble.

        1. avatar tdiinva (Now in Wisconsin) says:

          I was responding to the idea that all centerfire rounds are good at penetration cover. Almost all are and one of them is a very common round. The one that comes out of a standard AR-15. If the threat is shooting at you behind the cover provided by a cinderblock wall he will be protected from your return fire if you are using a 5.56round evendors at 25 yards. A 100 grain 243 will get to him out to at least 100 yards. If you have a 308 he is vulnerable at 250+ yards.

  11. avatar Mark Lloyd says:

    What is it, most defensive gun uses happen in dark or low light situations?
    Weapon lights!
    My primary carry doesn’t have a light, but my rifle does sport a X300 Ultra and a T1.

    1. avatar Vhyrus says:

      All of my long guns have lights and I carry a flashlight on me at all times

      1. avatar Mark Lloyd says:

        I don’t carry a flashlight during the day, but at night I do have a surefire flashlight of I think 15L on low and 350L on high. When I walk my doggies at night, I actually carry two lights. My Surefire and a lower end Streamlight, just in case one fails, which will happen right when you need it most!
        But you are smart to carry a light. I’d like to have a light on my P229, but I carry daily including home carry and I just don’t want the added bulk. I did take the X300 Ultra off my AK and tried it on my P229 and that really is nice!

  12. avatar Mark Lee says:

    The perp is lucky he doesn’t end up like Cotton Hill – shinless and 2 feet shorter.

  13. avatar uncommon_sense says:

    Concealment does not stop bullets, but many never learned that or forgot it. Know what your ammunition will penetrate.

    This is an argument for the largest caliber and heaviest bullet that you can shoot. I like .40 S&W 180 grain bullets for good penetration through light concealment such as car doors and windshields, home interior doors and walls, etc. Of course .45 ACP with 230 grain bullets are even better.

    The grand daddy of them all, however, is .44 Magnum shooting 240 grain semi-jacketed softpoint bullets. The fact that you will be deaf after shooting that .44 Magnum and your bullet is capable of going through your attacker and 3 more people beyond tends to be a deal breaker unfortunately. For those reasons, I tend to reserve .44 Magnum for the woods.

    Note: .44 Magnum shooting 180 grain hollowpoint bullets (with a muzzle velocity in the neighborhood of 1600 fps) are pretty spectacular for self-defense against human attackers but you would still lose your hearing.

    1. avatar Mark Chamberlain says:

      Here are comparisons of three Federal HST loads tested with the safety glass (windshield), and two steel layers (car door) of the FBI testing protocols. This data was taken from the Vista Outdoors web site which owns both Federal and Speer ammunition companies. 147 grain, 180 grain, 230 grain respectively all standard pressure

      Steel – Penetration Expansion Retained Wgt Safety Glass – Penetration Expansion Retained Wgt
      9mm 17.50 .430 145 11.00 .680 135
      .40 11.00 .450 124 14.00 .620 171
      .45 17.50 .510 230 10.50 .660 223
      There are not huge differences between the three as far as expansion. 9mm and .45 under penetrated in the glass test. .40 under penetrated in the steel test. Anyone can see the wound ballistics tests of the ammo offerings for Federal and Speer by visiting http://www.le.vistaoutdoor.com

      1. avatar uncommon_sense says:

        Nice!

        So the take-away is: use heavy-for-caliber bullets.

        1. avatar Mark Chamberlain says:

          My takeaway from it is to not get too involved in the caliber debate. Keep an open mind when choosing a defensive handgun load. Let the data help determine what the best load is for your purposes/situation. Of course, other considerations like capacity, felt recoil, cost, availability, and personal preference also influence the decision.

  14. avatar Tominator says:

    “Know what your ammunition will penetrate.”

    BULLSHEET!

    1. avatar Hannibal says:

      Goes through ankles pretty well.

  15. avatar Roymond says:

    My first take is that the lesson she should take away is make it harder to break into her house!

    And get a dog — a loud, mean-sounding one.

  16. avatar Cinncinatus says:

    Now the perp doesn’t have a leg to stand on.

    Ba-dum, tiss

  17. avatar some dude says:

    I don’t think penetration was an issue once he had clear line of fire. Know how to get a clear line of fire would seem the takeaway from this.

  18. avatar SuperG says:

    Security cameras could have given her advance warning. They see in the dark these days too!

  19. avatar Gerry Gober says:

    These shooting tips will help you be prepared no matter what comes at you. Though many of us hope to never have to use our weapon to save our lives or the lives of our loved ones, it is a harsh reality that we never know what lies ahead of us and could potentially need to use a handgun for more than target practice.

  20. The Arabs in the Holy Land – Natives or Invaders?
    Before the beginning of the 20th century, there were practically no
    Arabs in the Holy Land. In 1695 there was not a single Muslim
    Arab in Gaza, Nazareth, and Um-El-Phachem. All Arabs there
    were Christians. Historically, a “Palestinian” people never existed.
    The English name “Palestinian”, to describe the local Arab population, was invented AFTER the establishment of the State
    of Israel in 1948. These Arabs do not even have a native name to describe themselves
    in their own Arabic language. The Arabs who now claim to be natives of
    the Holy Land have migrated to Palestine and invaded the land after 1917, from
    neighboring Arab countries. There is only one possible solution to
    the “Palestinians” desire for a homeland – let them return
    to where they came from – to where they lived earlier for hundreds or thousands of years – to their real
    homeland in their original Arab countries.

    Dr. Harry Mandelbaum
    Copying, re-publication, translation, and distribution are
    permitted and encouraged. There is no need to ask for permission.

    The author thanks the readers who contributed additional information and references.

    This article is based only on Arab, Muslim, and foreign sources.
    Jewish / Israeli sources were deliberately left out
    to avoid accusations of bias.

    The latest version of this article in Hebrew הגרסה האחרונה של המאמר בעברית
    http://hm-holyland.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post.html

    The latest version of this article in English הגרסה האחרונה של המאמר באנגלית
    http://hm-holyland.blogspot.com/2011/12/arabs-in-holy-land-natives-or-aliens.html

    See also: :ראה גם
    Who Owns the Land of Israel
    http://hm-holyland.blogspot.com/2011/12/dr.html

    The Land of Israel – History Time Line
    http://hm-holyland.blogspot.com/2011/12/land-of-israel-history-time-line.html

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Unknown to most of the world population, the origin of the
    “Palestinian” Arabs’ claim to the Holy Land spans a period of
    a meager 30 years – a drop in the bucket compared to the thousands of years of the region’s rich history.

    Before the beginning of the 20th century, there were practically
    no Muslim Arabs in the Holy Land. In 1695 there was not a single Muslim Arab in
    Gaza, Nazareth, and Um-El-Phachem. All Arabs there were Christians.
    By contrast, the Jews, despite 2000 years of persecution and forced conversions by various conquerors, have throughout most of history been the majority population in the Holy Land.
    In Jerusalem Jews were always the largest demographic group [1][2],
    except for periods when conquerors specifically threw them out and prevented them from returning.

    When General Allenby, the commander of the British military forces, conquered Palestine in 1917/1918, only
    a few thousand Muslim Arabs resided in the Holy Land.
    Most of the Arabs were Christians, and most of the Muslims in the area either came from Turkey under the Ottoman Empire,
    or were the descendants of Jews and Christians who were
    forcefully converted to Islam by the Muslim conquerors. These Muslims were not of Arab origin.
    Most references to Arabs in Palestine before 1917 refer to the Christian Arabs, not to
    the Muslims.

    It is important to note that estimates and censuses conducted by the Muslim conquerors were biased.
    Therefore, the only reliable data is provided by non-Muslim sources.
    Tourists and politicians, Arabs and non-Arabs alike, have documented their observations of the population in the
    Holy Land beginning more that a thousand years ago.

    Let’s start at the early days and continue into the Ottoman period:
    The historian James Parkes wrote: “During the first century after the Arab conquest [640-740 CE], the caliph and governors of Syria and the Holy Land ruled entirely over Christian and Jewish subjects. Apart from the Bedouin in the earliest days, the only Arabs west of the Jordan were the garrisons.”[3]
    In year 985 the Arab writer Muqaddasi complained: “the mosque is empty of worshipers… The Jews constitute the majority of Jerusalem’s population” (The entire city
    of Jerusalem had only one mosque?). [4]
    In 1377, Ibn Khaldun, one of the most creditable Arab historians, wrote: “Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel extended over 1400 years… It was the Jews who implanted the culture and customs of the permanent settlement”.[5]
    In 1695-1696, the Dutch scholar and cartographer, Adriaan
    Reland (Hadriani Relandi) , wrote reports about visits to the Holy Land.
    (There are those who claim that he did not personally visit the Holy land but
    collected reports from other visitors.) He was fluent in Hebrew and Arabic.
    He documented visits to many locations.
    He writes: The names of settlements were mostly Hebrew, some Greek, and some
    Latin-Roman. No settlement had an original Muslim-Arab name with a historical root in its location.

    Most of the land was empty, desolate, and the inhabitants few in number and
    mostly concentrated in Jerusalem, Acco, Tzfat, Jaffa, Tiberius and
    Gaza. Most of the inhabitants were Jews and the
    rest Christians. There were few Muslims, mostly nomad Bedouins.
    The Arabs were predominantly Christians with a tiny minority of Muslims.
    In Jerusalem there were approximately 5000 people, mostly Jews and some Christians.

    In Nazareth there were approximately 700 people – all Christians.
    In Gaza there were approximately 550 people – half of them Jews and half Christians.
    Um-El-Phachem was a village of 10 families – all Christians.
    The only exception was Nablus with 120 Muslims from the Natsha
    family and approximately 70 Shomronites.[6]
    In 1835 Alphonse de Lamartine wrote: “Outside the city of Jerusalem, we saw no living object, heard no living sound. . .a complete eternal silence reigns in the town, in the highways, in the country.”[7]
    In 1844, William Thackeray writes about the road from Jaffa to Jerusalem:
    “Now the district is quite deserted, and you ride among what seem to be so many petrified waterfalls. We saw no animals moving among the stony brakes; scarcely even a dozen little birds in the whole course of the ride.”[8]
    In 1857, the British consul in Palestine, James Finn, reported: “The country is in a considerable degree empty of inhabitants and therefore its greatest need is that of a body of population.”[9]
    In 1866, W.M. Thomson writes: “How melancholy is this utter desolation. Not a house, not a trace of inhabitants, not even shepherds, to relieve the dull monotony … Much of the country through which we have been rambling for a week appears never to have been inhabited, or even cultivated; and there are other parts, you say, still more barren.”[10]
    In 1867, Charles Wyllys Elliott, president of Harvard
    University, wrote: “A beautiful sea lies unbosomed among the Galilean hills, in the midst of that land once possessed by Zebulon and Naphtali, Asher and Dan … Life here was once idyllic, charming … It was a world of ease, simplicity, and beauty; now it is a scene of desolation and misery.”[11]
    In 1867, Mark Twain – Samuel Clemens, the famous author of “Huckleberry Finn”
    and “Tom Sawyer”, toured the Holy Land. This is how he described
    the land: “There is not a solitary village throughout its whole extent – not for thirty miles in either direction. There are two or three small clusters of Bedouin tents, but not a single permanent habitation. One may ride ten miles, hereabouts, and not see ten human beings. … No man can stand here by deserted Ain Mellahah and say the prophecy [“and your land shall be
    desolate and your cities waste”] has not been fulfilled … We had left Capernaum behind us. It was only a shapeless ruin. It bore no semblance to a town, and had nothing about it to suggest that it had ever been a town … These unpeopled deserts, these rusty mounds of barrenness… A desolate country whose soil is rich enough but is given over wholly to weeds. A silent, mournful expanse… the country is infested with fierce Bedouins, whose sole happiness it is, in this life, to cut and stab and mangle and murder unoffending Christians. Allah be with us! … A desolation is here that not even imagination can grace with the pomp of life and action. We reached Tabor safely. We never saw a human being on the whole route … After a while we came to a shapeless mass of ruins, which still bears the name of Bethel. There was hardly a tree or a shrub anywhere. Even the olive and the cactus, those fast friends of a worthless soil, had almost deserted the country… No landscape exists that is more tiresome to the eye than that which bounds the approaches to Jerusalem…. we were marching down a close, flaming, rugged, desolate defile, where no living creature could enjoy life, except, perhaps, a salamander. It was such a dreary, repulsive, horrible solitude! … Ancient Jericho is not very picturesque as a ruin… The journey to the Dead Sea, the Jordan and Bethlehem was short, but it was an exhausting one. Such roasting heat, such oppressive solitude, and such dismal desolation can not surely exist elsewhere on earth… Of all the lands there are for dismal scenery, I think Palestine must be the prince….It is a hopeless, dreary, heart-broken land… I would like much to see the fringes of the Jordan in spring-time, and Shechem, Esdraelon, Ajalon and the borders of Galilee–but even then these spots would seem mere toy gardens set at wide intervals in the waste of a limitless desolation. Palestine sits in sackcloth and ashes. … one finds only a squalid camp of fantastic Bedouins of the desert… Nazareth is forlorn… Jericho the accursed, lies a moldering ruin, … Bethlehem and Bethany, in their poverty and their humiliation, … is untenanted by any living creature… Renowned Jerusalem itself, the stateliest name in history, has lost all its ancient grandeur, and is become a pauper village… The noted Sea of Galilee … was long ago deserted … Capernaum is a shapeless ruin; Magdala is the home of beggared Arabs; Bethsaida and Chorazin have vanished from the earth… a solitude that is inhabited only by birds of prey and skulking foxes. Palestine is desolate and unlovely.”[12]
    In 1874, Reverend Samuel Manning wrote: “But where were the inhabitants? This fertile plain, which might support an immense population, is almost a solitude…. Day by day we were to learn afresh the lesson now forced upon us, that the denunciations of ancient prophecy have been fulfilled to the very letter — “the land is left
    void and desolate and without inhabitants.” (Jeremiah, ch.44 v.22)[13]
    In 1881, the British cartographer Arthur Penrhyn Stanley wrote: “In Judea
    it is hardly an exaggeration to say that for miles and miles there was no appearance of life
    or habitation.”
    In 1892, B. W. Johnson writes: “In the portion of the plain
    between Mount Carmel and Jaffa one sees but rarely a
    village or other sights of human life… A ride of half an hour more brought
    us to the ruins of the ancient city of Cæsarea, once a city of two
    hundred thousand inhabitants, and the Roman capital of Palestine,
    but now entirely deserted… I laid upon my couch at night, to listen to the moaning of the waves and to think of the desolation around us.”[14]
    In 1913, a British report, by the Palestinian Royal Commission, quotes an account of the conditions on the coastal plain along the Mediterranean Sea: “The
    road leading from Gaza to the north was only a
    summer track, suitable for transport by camels or carts.
    No orange groves, orchards or vineyards were to be seen until one
    reached the [Jewish] Yabna village. Houses were mud. Schools did not exist.
    The western part toward the sea was almost a desert.

    The villages in this area were few and thinly populated.
    Many villages were deserted by their inhabitants.”

    As we can see, throughout history, as documented by Arab historians and by foreign observers before 1917, the land was desolate; there were practically no Muslim Arabs in the cities outside of Jerusalem (except 120 Muslims in Nablus); and the number of Muslim Arabs (other than Ottoman Muslims or Christian Arabs) was minuscule, most of them nomadic Bedouins. In 1695 there was not a single Muslim Arab in Gaza, Nazareth, and Um-El-Phachem. All Arabs there were Christians. The difference between these multiple authentic accounts and the falsified Muslim-Arab propaganda is huge, almost beyond imagination.

    Mark Twain’s description of the Holy Land has been the target of severe Muslim criticism. However, earlier and later visitors to the Holy Land all give the same description of desolation, misery, and lack of inhabitants, thus confirming Mark Twain’s observations.

    Neville Chamberlain, in a speech given at the Alexandra Theatre, Birmingham, 13 Oct. 1918, said: “A great responsibility will
    rest upon the Zionists, who before long will be proceeding with joy in their hearts to the ancient seat of their people.
    Theirs will be the task to build up a new prosperity and a new civilization in old Palestine, so long neglected and misruled.
    They will carry with them the hearty goodwill of the British nation and
    its earnest hope that in their own country they may
    prove worthy of their past and of the great
    opportunity that has been given to them.”

    When the Holy Land was taken from the Ottomans by the British, it was no longer under Muslim control. The Quran commands Muslims to take land away from non-Muslims, including land which they have never trodden on before[15]. Following the British conquest of the Holy land, the Muslim Arabs embarked on a massive immigration into the Holy Land, fulfilling their religious obligation to capture as much foreign land as possible. The following accounts describe the massive Arab immigration after 1918:
    In 1930/31, Lewis French, the British Director of Development wrote about the Arabs in Palestine: “We found it inhabited by fellahin
    (Arab farmers) who lived in mud hovels and suffered severely from the prevalent malaria…
    Large areas were uncultivated… The fellahin, if not themselves cattle thieves, were always ready to
    harbor these and other criminals. The individual plots changed hands annually.

    There was little public security, and the fellahin’s lot was an alternation of pillage and
    blackmail by their neighbors, the bedouin (Arab nomads).”
    The British Hope-Simpson Commission recommended, in 1930, “Prevention of illicit immigration” to stop the illegal Arab immigration from neighboring Arab countries.[16]
    The British Governor of the Sinai (1922-36) reported in the Palestine Royal Commission Report: “This illegal immigration was not only going on from the Sinai, but also from Transjordan and Syria.”
    The governor of the Syrian district of Hauran, Tewfik Bey El Hurani, admitted in 1934 that in a single period of only a few months over 30,000 Syrians from Houran had moved to Palestine.
    British Prime Minister Winston Churchill noted the Arab influx. Churchill, a veteran of the early years of the British mandate in the Holy Land, noted in 1939 that “far from being persecuted, the Arabs have crowded into the country and multiplied till their population has increased more than even all world Jewry could lift up the Jewish population.”
    The Arab population in the Holy Land increased only because of their massive immigration from neighboring Arab countries. Before 1918, when the Arab immigration started, only a minuscule number of Muslim Arabs lived in the Holy Land, practically all of them in Jerusalem. This is why it is so difficult to find an old-age Muslim-Arab whose grandparents were born in the Holy Land.

    Muslim-Arab population [1][2] and growth in Jerusalem before and after 1918.
    The break point between the two straight lines shows the exact point in time
    when the massive Arab immigration into the Holy Land started.

    While the Holy Land was ruled by the Muslim Ottomans, despite large waves of Jewish Zionist immigration, there were practically no conflicts between the Jews and the few local Arabs. Jews and local Arabs lived peacefully together. This peaceful co-existence ended after 1918, when the large waves of foreign Muslim-Arab immigration started, following the British conquest. Up until 1948 the British restricted Jewish immigration and encouraged Muslim-Arab immigration. It is the landless foreign Muslim-Arabs who immigrated after 1918 that started the conflict, NOT the zionistic Jewish immigration between 1881-1914, which was a peaceful period. For example, in 1929, the Hebron Massacre of the local Jews was done by foreign Arabs, not by the established local families who lived there and even tried to defend the Jews.

    The Quran explicitly encourages lying and deception if it helps Muslims achieve a desired goal [17][18][19][20]. To deny the massive invasion of the Holy Land by foreign Muslims, the falsified Muslim-Arab propaganda claims that it is a myth. If it is indeed a myth, how can anyone explain the following simple observations?
    The grandparents of the author’s wife were born in the Holy Land in the 19th century. They saw with their own eyes how empty the land was at the time. They also lived through and experienced first-hand the British conquest and the Arab’s massive invasion of the land that started in 1918. This invasion lasted for only 30 years, and ended in 1948 with the evacuation of the British from the land and the declaration of the state of Israel.
    One of the readers of an earlier version of this article sent the author a similar description by his grandfather. His grandfather was one of the founders of Petach Tikvah (in 1878). The grandfather described to his children and grandchildren how empty and desolate the land used to be. Arabs started immigrating to the Holy Land with the hope of finding employment in the new Jewish villages.
    The family names of many Arabs who now occupy the Holy Land reveal their country of origin: Masri (from Egypt ), Iraqi (from Iraq), Tarabulsi (from Tarabulus-Tripoli in Lebanon), Hourani (from Houran in Syria), Husseini (from Jordan), and Saudi (from Saudi Arabia).
    Following the publication of an earlier version of this article, the author received an email message from a reader who used to work with Arabs in Gaza and in various villages in the West Bank in the 1970’s. In his email the reader describes friendly discussions about family history with his Arab co-workers. Most of the co-workers had grandfathers who immigrated to the Holy Land from neighboring countries.
    When Churchill said that “the Arabs have crowded into the country and multiplied till their population has increased more than even all world Jewry could lift up the Jewish population.” was he lying? Churchill was not a Muslim…

    The name “Palestina” is a Latin-Roman name based on the Hebrew Biblical name of the ancient “Philistines” — “Plishtim” in Hebrew. The translation of this name to English is: “invaders”. The Philistines arrived from the Mediterranean islands near Greece and invaded the land about 4000 years ago . The Philistines are extinct since approximately 2000 years ago, and have no ancestral or historical relationship to Arabs. Before 1917, during the 400-years rule of the Ottoman empire, the Ottomans did not call the Holy Land “Palestina”. The British decided to renew this ancient name and officially called the land “Palestine”.

    The term “Palestinian” was used in reference to Jews not to Arabs. The “Anglo-Palestine Bank” founded in 1902/3 was a Jewish bank which later became “Bank Leumi”. The “Palestinian Post” founded in 1932 was a Jewish paper that later became the “Jerusalem Post”.

    The local Arabs never called themselves “Palestinians”, not even during the British mandate. Both Arab and British leaders referred to them only as “Arabs”. For example: The Hope-Simpson report[16] published by the British in 1930, contains the phrase “the number of Palestinian unemployed,
    whether Arab, Jew or other…”. “Palestinian” was used only as an adjective in reference to the location and also included Jews. The Arab inhabitants were always referred to as “Arabs”. The word “palestinians” does not appear anywhere in this report. “Palestinian Arabs”, “Palestinian Jews”, and “Palestinian Christians” were common terms. But, “Palestinians”, as a noun, before 1948, was not yet invented.

    After 30 years of invasion, following the end of the British mandate and the declaration of the state of Israel in 1948, the Arabs recognized the fact that they invaded foreign land and invented for themselves a name in English — “Palestinians”. If the British were to call the land “New England”, and the local Arabs were to call themselves “English” would they automatically become English? It is important to emphasize that the concept of a “Palestinian” to describe the local Arab residents was invented by the Arabs AFTER the declaration of the state of Israel. This group of Arabs, who started calling themselves “the Palestinian
    nation” after 1948, does not have an original name in their native Arabic language.
    Is there any nation in the world which does not have a name in its original native language? The Arabs who invaded the Holy Land do not have a name in their native Arabic language because they are not, and have never been, a unified group or a nation. Most of those Arabs cannot even pronounce the word “Palestinian”. They pronounce it “Falestinian”.

    Historically, a “Falestinian” people never existed. The fact is that the Arabs, who now try to call themselves by the English name “Palestinians” and mis-pronounce it “Falestinians”, don’t even know what their name is in Arabic. Even Arab leaders and historians have admitted that a “Palestinian” people never existed. For example:

    In 1937, the Arab leader Auni Bey Abdul Hadi told the Peel Commission: “There
    is no such country as Palestine. Palestine is a term the Zionists invented.
    Palestine is alien to us.”
    In 1946, Princeton’s Arab professor of Middle East history, Philip Hitti, told the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry: “It’s common
    knowledge, there is no such thing as Palestine
    in history.”
    In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, an executive member of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), said in an interview to the Dutch newspaper Trouw: “The ‘Palestinian people’ does not exist.
    The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our
    struggle against the state of Israel.”
    Joseph Farah, an Arab-American journalist, writes: “The
    truth is that Palestine is no more real than Never-Never Land.
    Palestine has never existed as an autonomous entity.”
    Walid Shoebat, a former PLO terrorist acknowledged the lie he was fighting for: “Why is it that on June 4th 1967 I was a Jordanian and overnight I became a Palestinian? … we considered ourselves Jordanian until the Jews returned to Jerusalem. Then all of the sudden we were Palestinians. They removed the star from the Jordanian flag and all at once we had a Palestinian flag.”
    The Syrian dictator Hafez Assad said: “There is no such thing as
    a Palestinian people, there is no Palestinian entity”.
    Dr. Azmi Bishara, a notable leader of the Arabs in Israel, who fought against the Israeli “occupation”, said in a TV interview[21]: “There is no Palestinian
    nation. It’s a colonial invention. When were there any Palestinians?” To see a clip of the interview click here.
    The Arabs who now claim to be natives of the Holy Land have migrated to Palestine and invaded the land after 1917, from neighboring Arab countries, predominantly from areas now known as Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq. None of these countries existed as nations prior to 1913. They were nothing but a disorganized collection of tribes, constantly terrorizing each other, trying to seize land from their neighbors. Unfortunately, those Arab invaders, imported into the Holy Land their age-old “culture” of terrorizing neighbors to seize land. Many of them were social outcasts and criminals who could not find jobs in their own countries so they searched for their luck elsewhere. Some of them were accepted by the British regime as a source of cheap labor and were allowed to settle on unoccupied Jewish land. Even Yassir Arafat, the leader of the PLO, is not a native of the Holy Land. He called himself a “Palestinian refugee” but spoke Arabic with an Egyptian dialect. He was born in 1929 in Cairo, Egypt. He served in the Egyptian army, studied in the University of Cairo, and lived in Cairo until 1956. He then moved to Saudi-Arabia and founded the Al-Fatah terror organization, the precursor to the PLO, in Kuwait in 1958, together with his Saudi-Arabian friends. How exactly does that constitute a “Palestinian refugee”? Being born in 1929 in Cairo, he cannot even be considered a son of Palestinian refugees (there were no refugees in 1929). Arafat must have been a good student of Muhammad, the founder of the Muslim religion, who said in the Quran: “War is deception”.[17]

    In their propaganda, the Arabs who now call themselves “Palestinians” consistently demand that Israel and the world recognize their “pre-1948” rights. That’s about 60 years ago. Mysteriously, they are never willing to add another 60 years to their “historical” claims on the Holy Land. They know very well that doing so will send them back to where they came from – Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Lebanon, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq. Years ago, during negotiations with the, so-called, “Palestinians”, a Israeli negotiator proposed to revise a mention of their claim of “pre-1948” rights and replace it with “pre-1917”. The “Palestinians” vehemently opposed. Now we know why.

    If there is anyone who still believes that a “Palestinian” nation ever existed before the end of the British mandate and the founding of the state of Israel, would they please be kind enough to answer when was it founded and by whom? What was its name in Arabic (not in Latin-English)? What was its form of government? What were its borders? Name one top “Palestinian” leader before Arafat? Which country ever recognized its existence and when? In which library or museum can we find any of its literature, coins, or historical artifacts? The answer to all these questions is “nil”. As stated by Zahir Muhsein: “The ‘Palestinian’ people does not exist.”

    Some Arabs consider themselves the descendants of Abraham, the forefather of the Jewish nation. Ironically, if not for Muhammad’s study of the Bible, the Arabs would not have known of the existence of Abraham. Muhammad invented the Muslim religion in the 7th century AD, in Saudi Arabia. He studied the Bible in order to be better equipped in his attempts to persuade the Jews to follow his newly invented religion. When the Jews refused, he dictated the stories of the Quran (the Muslim bible) to his students, and filled it with his own imaginary accounts of Biblical events. (Muhammad himself did not know how to read or write.) He even took the liberty to change the God-given day of rest, Saturday – the Sabbath. Since Sunday was already taken by the Christians, he picked Friday as the next-best Muslim day of rest.

    Muhammad never visited Jerusalem and the Holy Land, and did not consider them important enough to mention their name in the Quran even once. By comparison, Mecca and Medina, the only two Muslim holy cities, are mentioned in the Quran hundreds of times. Even though the name of the Holy Land is not mentioned in the Quran, the Quran refers to the Holy Land many times as the land of the children of Israel.[22] [23] [24][25].

    The Jewish Holy Temple stood on Temple Mount long before the Muslim religion, or any other current world religion was conceived. Even when the founders of the Christian religion walked around in the streets of ancient Jerusalem there were no mosques nor churches there – only the Jewish Holy Temple and nothing else. The land of the Jewish Holy Temple in Jerusalem was purchased by King David, for the Jewish people, approximately 850 years BCE. The deed, the name of the previous owner, and the purchase price were recorded in the Bible (See Samuel-B Ch. 24 and Chronicles-A Ch. 21-22).

    Today the Muslim “Palestinians” claim to own Temple Mount, the site of the Jewish Holy Temple in Jerusalem. They claim it is “their” holy site. Does anyone in the rest of the world know which way the Muslims in Jerusalem face when they pray? When the Muslims in Jerusalem pray in their mosques, even in the “Al Aktza” mosque built on the edge of Temple Mount, they face their holy city Mecca and stand with their back turned to Temple Mount. When they bow down in their prayers they show their behind to the location of the Holy Temple. How consistent is that with considering it a Muslim holy site?

    Muslims praying on Temple Mount point their behind to where the Holy Temple used to stand.
    (Photos courtesy imageshack.us and corbis)

    The Muslims have long ago recognized that the Holy Temple is a Jewish holy site. Its name in Arabic is “Al Quds” – “The
    Holiness” in English, which is an abbreviation for “The
    House of Holiness” – The Jewish Holy Temple. The fact is that Jerusalem is not important enough to the Muslims to be mentioned even once in the Quran, while Mecca and Medina, the only two Muslim holy cities, are mentioned hundreds of times. Even when the Jordanians occupied Jerusalem, up until 1967, they never considered it their capital, and Arab leaders did not come to visit.

    Can any Muslim in the world produce any credible evidence for their connection to this holy site, other than in Muhammad’s dream? Believe it or not, the one and only source for the Muslims’ claim to Jerusalem and the site of the Holy Temple, is a mention in the Quran of a dream that Muhammad had about an unknown “far distant place of worship (mosque)”[26]. This “far distant place of worship” could not have been in Jerusalem, because in Muhammad’s time there was no worship taking place at the site of the Holy Temple and there was not even a single mosque in Jerusalem. The first mosque in Jerusalem was built 83 years after Muhammad died. Perhaps this “far distant place of worship” is the site of the Vatican in Italy?

    The best reference for understanding the Muslim-Arab mentality and politically-motivated falsification of history is Muhammad’s own advice to his followers: “War is deception”[17][18][19][20].

    The real problem facing those Arabs today is not the lack of a homeland. The historical root-cause of their problem and frustration is the fact that the countries they came from have not agreed to accept them back in. This is why so many of them live, up until today, in refugee camps, in neighboring Arab countries, lacking fundamental civil rights. In their frustration they feel that the only hope and choice they have is to try and steal a country. Many of the vehicles and the agricultural equipment in the Palestinian Authority have been stolen from their Israeli neighbors. For a while, Israel suffered the highest rate of automobile thefts in the world! Most of these stolen vehicles were later found in towns and villages of the Palestinian Authority. If invading foreign land is so easy; if stealing vehicles is so easy; why not try and steal a country too?

    There is only one possible solution to the “Palestinians” desire for a homeland. It is the only solution that will satisfy their claim of the right to return to their homeland. Since helping them return to where they lived for less than 30 years is their own definition of justice, then helping them return to where they lived earlier for hundreds or thousands of years is, by the same definition, a better justice. Let’s all help them get the better justice they deserve. Let’s help them return to where they came from – Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq.

    Recent proposals have suggested a two-state solution to the Israeli-Arab conflict – one for the Jews and one for the Arabs. The map below shows that a much more generous solution already exists – 21 states – one for the Jews and twenty for the Arabs.

    The 21-state solution proposal infuriated some Arabs. This is not the solution they wanted. They wanted negotiations leading to a compromise over how much of the Land of Israel they can get.

    Imagine that, while you are away on vacation, your neighbor invades your home and settles there. When you come back, you ask him to leave. He says: “I entered an
    empty building. It is my home.” You say: “This is my home,
    get out of here.” To avoid escalating the situation, your neighbor proposes a compromise: “You get half the building and I
    get half the building.” How would you respond?

    The Quran contains more than 100 verses commanding Muslims to fight a war against non-Muslims[27]. Some verses command Muslims to chop off heads and fingers and terrorize and kill non-Muslims[28]. Other verses command Muslims to take land away from non-Muslims[15]. Muslims are also prohibited from living in peace with non-Muslims on non-Muslim land[29]. Anyone who avoids fighting against non-Muslims is punished. Because of such religious commandments, there is no chance and no hope that Muslims will ever live peacefully together with non-Muslims who live on non-Muslim land. Temporary periods of calm are nothing but a waiting period – waiting in ambush – waiting for an opportunity to strike[30].

    If you still have any doubts as to what is the real meaning of the word “Islam”, or as to what are the real intentions of Muslims world wide, take a look at the following pictures of Muslims marching through the streets of London during a “Religion of Peace” Demonstration.

    During the rise of Islam, Muhammad tried to convert the Jews of Medina to Islam. When they refused, he murdered them. The Muslims who conquered northern Africa during the 7th and 8th centuries, did the same. Only those who converted to Islam, or managed to hide, survived. Jews who refused to convert were massacred. In Morocco, in the 8th century, whole communities were wiped out by Muslim ruler Idris ibn Abdullah. Even as late as the 19th century, In Morocco, more than 300,000 Jews were murdered between 1864 and 1880 – their only offense being their refusal to convert to Islam.

    History proves that a population exchange is the only possible solution, other than war, to conflicts between Muslims and non-Muslims. For example, in 1923, the war between Turkey and Greece ended only when both sides agreed to a population exchange of more than two million Muslims and Greek-Orthodox Christians. Similarly, in 1947, more than 14 million Muslims, Hindus, and Sikhs, have exchanged locations in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh.

    About 820,000 Jewish refugees have relocated out of the Arab countries; about 560,000 of them moved to Israel and 260,000 moved to other countries. The number of Jewish refugees who relocated out of Arab countries, is a little larger than the total number of Arabs who lived in the Holy Land in 1947. Between 472,000 and 650,000 Arabs, who invaded the Holy Land during the past 30 years, returned to their neighboring Arab countries, while 160,000 remained in the State of Israel after 1948 [31]. Now it is time to end the conflict between Jews and Muslims in Israel. The only possible peaceful solution is to complete the second half of this Jewish-Muslim population exchange by returning the remaining Muslims in the Holy Land back to the Arab-Muslim countries where they came from. As we can see in the map above, there is no shortage of space in the Arab-Muslim countries.

    A) Jerusalem population estimate of Dr. Schultze, Prussian consul in 1845: 7,120 Jews, 5,000 Muslims, 3,390 Christians, 800 Turkish soldiers and 100 Europeans. B) “The
    sedentary population of Jerusalem numbers about
    15,500 souls, of whom 4,000 are Mussulmans (Muslims) and 8,
    000 Jews. The Mussulmans forming about a fourth part of the whole,
    and consisting of Turks, Arabs, and Moors…” (Karl Marks, new York Daily Tribune, 15 April 1854). C) Population estimate of 1868 in the Jerusalem Almanack: 9,000 Jews, 5,000 Muslims, 4,000 Christians . D) Population, Ottoman subjects 1905: 40,000 Jews, 10,900 Christian Arabs, 8,000 Muslim Arabs. Total Population 58,900. By 1914 the Jewish population was 45,000. E) “Out of about
    60,000 inhabitants some 40,000 are jews.” (Miss Freer, Inner Jerusalem, 1907). All are quoted in: “Jerusalem:
    Illustrated History Atlas”, Martin Gilbert, Macmillan Publishing, New York, 1978
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/19551586/JERUSALEM-Illustrated-History
    Focus on Jerusalem Prophecy Ministry, by Darrell G. Young. Muslim population numbers and growth are consistent with Ref. [1] above and follow the exact same pattern.
    http://focusonjerusalem.com/jerusalempopchart.html
    James Parkes, “Whose Land? A History of the Peoples of Palestine”(Harmondsworth, Great Britain: 1970), p.66.
    Muqaddasi, quoted by Erich Kahler who cites this statement from Knowlege of Crimes, p.167, in The Jews Among the Nations (New York: F. Ungar, 1967), p. 144.
    Ibn Khaldun, quoted by Yahya Armajami, Middle East Past and Present (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970), p. 143.
    Hadriani Relandi, “Palaestina ex monumentis veteribus illustrate” written in Latin, Published in 1714, Utrecht, ex libraria Guilielmi Broedelet (Trajecti Batavorum)
    Alphonse de Lamartine, “Recollections of the East”, Vol. 1 (London 1845) p.268
    William Thackeray, “From Jaffa To Jerusalem” (1844)
    James Finn, British Foreign Office Documents 78/1294, Pol. No. 36
    W.M. Thomson, “The Land and the Book” (London: T. Nelsons & Sons, 1866); and “Southern Palestine and Jerusalem” (1882).
    Charles Wyllys Elliott, “Remarkable Characters and Places of the Holy Land”, Published in 1867 by J.B. Burr & Company, Hartford, Connecticut. Quoted by Mark Twain in “The Innocents Abroad”.
    Mark Twain, “The Innocents Abroad” (American Pub. Co., 1869)
    http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3176/3176.txt
    Reverend Samuel Manning, “Those Holy Fields” (London, 1874), pp.14-17
    B. W. Johnson, “Young Folks in Bible Lands”: Chapter IV, (1892)
    “And He made you heirs to their land and their dwellings and their property, and
    to a land which you have not yet trodden.” (Quran 33:27). “See they
    not that we gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders?” (Quran 13:41).
    The Hope-Simpson report, (London 1930)
    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/Hope_Simpson.html
    “Muhammad said: ‘… for war is deception.’ ” (Tabari 8:23) . “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘War is deceit.’
    ‘”(Sahih Bukhari:4.268). “When the Prophet (peace be upon him) intended to go on an expedition, he always pretended to be
    going somewhere else, and he would say: War is deception.”. (Sunan of Abu-Dawood Hadith 2631 Narrated by Ka’b ibn Malik). “war is deception” (Ahmad, 6.459).
    http://www.islam-watch.org/Warner/Taqiyya-Islamic-Principle-Lying-for-Allah.htm
    http://www.islamreview.com/articles/lying.shtml
    http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/011-taqiyya.htm
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3n5-yG-6dU
    Shaykh Prof. Abdul Hadi Palazzi, “What the Qur’an Really Says”
    http://www.templemount.org/quranland.html
    Quran, 17:104 : “And thereafter We [Allah] said to the Children of Israel:
    Dwell securely in the Promised Land.”
    Quran, 5:20-21: “Moses said to his people … O my people,
    enter the Holy Land which Allah has assigned to you.”
    Quran, 10:93 : “We settled the Children of Israel in
    a beautiful dwelling-place, and provided for them sustenance of the best.”
    Quran, 17:01 : “Glorified be He who carried his servant by night
    from the inviolable place of worship (mosque in Mecca) to
    the far distant place of worship (far distant mosque).” See also:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isra_and_Mi%27raj
    http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/023-violence.htm
    “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve.
    Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.” (Quran 8:12). “Fight those who do
    not believe in Allah… nor acknowledge the religion of Truth.” (Quran 9:29). “Against
    them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power,
    including steeds of war, to strike terror into the enemies of Allah.” (Quran 8.60). “If
    you have made a treaty with infidels who are honorable, do not break the
    treaty until after the holy months are past. Then fight them
    and kill them wherever you find them, and take them captive, and besiege them, and ambush them.” (Quran 9:4-5).
    “they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain” (Quran 9:
    111). “Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you” (Quran 9:
    123). “And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah” (Quran 8.39).
    “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Quran 2:216). “… slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush” (Quran
    9:5). “Go forth, light-armed and heavy armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah” (Quran 9:41).

    “So when you meet in battle those who disbelieve, then smite the necks until when you have overcome them, then make them prisoners” (Quran 47:
    4). “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say: O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”
    (Bukhari 52:256). “The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.”
    (Muslim 1:33). “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.”
    (Bukhari 8:387). “Kill any Jew who falls under your power.” (Tabari 7:97).

    “Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.” (Ib…

    “what is the matter with you, that, when you are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, you cling heavily to the earth? … Unless you go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place.”
    (Quran 9:38-39). “Those of the believers who sit still, other than those who are disabled, are not on an equality with those who strive in the way of Allah with their wealth and lives.” (Quran, 4:95).
    “whoever turns back (from the war against the non-believers), He will punish him with a painful punishment.” (Quran, 48:17).

    “and lie in wait for them in every ambush” (Quran 9:5)
    Many Arabs claim that 800,000 to 1,000,000 Palestinians became refugees in 1947­/49.
    The last census was taken in 1945. It found only 756,000 permanent Arab residents in Israel.

    On November 30, 1947, the date the UN voted for partition, the
    total was 809,100. A 1949 Government of Israel census counted
    160,000 Arabs living in the country after the war.
    This meant no more than 650,000 Palestinian
    Arabs could have become refugees. A report by the UN
    Mediator on Palestine arrived at an even lower figure — 472,000.

    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/refugees.html
    There are only three possible ways to end this kind of a
    conflict: 1) peace; 2) war; and, 3) population exchange.
    There are those who believe that Israel needs to accept the
    presence of the Muslim Arabs who now reside in the Holy Land, just like other
    invaders and conquerors remain in many other countries.
    What this means is that the consequences of invasions and wars need
    to be accepted. Such legitimization of the consequences of war is, in
    effect, legitimization of war. If Israel is expected to accept the
    consequences of the Arabs’ presence, then the Arabs should also be expected to accept the consequences of the wars with Israel.

    As we have seen above, peace is not an option because it is prohibited
    by the Muslim religion. See more on the hopelessness of peace
    in the link below. Therefore, the only other options are either war and
    extermination of the enemy, or, population exchange. A population exchange is obviously the preferable choice.

    http://middleeastfacts.com/Articles/peace-or-piece-by-piece.php

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email