(courtesy connecticut.cbslocal.com)

“It just does something to me to know that those were guns that were used to kill people,” Henrietta Beckman told courant.com, standing in front of artist Michael Kalish’s “anti-violence” sculpture. “Those are guns that won’t be used ever again.” Well she got it half right. The chances that any of the “buyback” firearms assembled to create the artwork were used in a homicide are lower than the morals of the anti-gun pols gathered at the unveiling. And if they were, that just shows the stupidity of the “no questions asked” collection process, which destroys potential evidence of criminality. But you can understand her confusion . . .

Ms. Beckman, whose son was shot and killed in 2002, is a “vocal anti-gun-violence activist” and member of Mothers United Against Violence. For whom all, all guns are evil death dealers. The idea that some of the broken-ass firearms that went into the sculpture were used for hunting or self-defense or defense against government tyranny is an anathema.

There was plenty of that kind of “thinking” on display at the event, which included Connecticut Governor Dannel Molloy, Lt. Gov. Nancy Wyman, U.S. Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy and U.S. Rep. John Larson. Yup, the gun-grabbing gang was all there, spouting the usual anti-ballistic B.S.

“Maybe a beautiful piece of art won’t be the straw that breaks the camel’s back,” Murphy said, referring to the need for stronger anti-gun legislation. “But gatherings like this — where we re-commit ourselves to the idea that through any means possible, political action, civic action or cultural action that we will get this done — gets us a little closer to that day when the streets of Hartford are truly as safe as they can be.”

By depriving Americans of their natural, civil and Constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms. Gotcha.

Of course, a more careful reading of the Constitution State Senator’s comments – pining for the day when the streets of Hartford “are truly as safe as they can be” – leaves me wondering: how safe can the streets of Hartford be if residents are denied their gun rights? Not so safe now (23 murders per 100k population). And a lot less safe later.

Murphy pledges to pursue this agenda by “any means possible?” How great is that? But you expect that from a statist. What really gets me going is this comment from the artist: “I hope it starts a conversation.” That’s anti-gun agitprop speak for “encourages a push for civilian disarmament.”

OK then, let’s start that conversation with this: Do you want to live in a society where only the police are armed? Sorry. I know. They’ll say yes. Liars. Every one of them. Let’s see how this line of thinking goes down at the sculpture’s next stop, in Detroit, where residents are taking up arms in their own defense.

68 Responses to “Anti-Violence” Sculpture Made from Buyback Guns Now on Tour

        • +1 on that! It would be an awesome steel range!

          I also wonder if they are going to have a vehicle turn-in program, no questions asked? We really do need to stop the vehicle “violence” that claimed 33,561 lives in 2012 on American highways (according to the NHTSA). 2,362,000 people were also injured, and 3,950,000 crashes resulted in property damage only. And they call the shooting sport violent . . .

  1. Yes. Let’s start a conversation Senator. Why are their Capitol Police with guns in DC guarding your entrance? Let’s get rid of them. Why are their state troopers with guns in Hartford guarding the entrance to the state capitol and governor’s office. Let’s get rid of them. Why are their armed private security protecting all of those rich white elites in those shiny office buildings in downtown Hartford and Stamford. Disarm them I say! Stop being racist! Trayvon Martin! For the Children!!

    C’mon Senator. Let’s have the conversation

    • How much electricity or natural gas was used to melt that gun steel?

      How much CO2 was carelessly dumped into our planet’s fragile atmosphere to manufacture something that has zero practical value?

      How many cute, adorable mincemeat baby pups are senselessly slaughtered each year to make mincemeat pie?

      (Sniffling Uncontrollably)

  2. Besides being a stupid idea, it’s an ugly sculpture, and will have no effect on Hartford’s horrendous crime rate. If I were a CT resident, I’d be yelling at my public servants for wasting their time on this.

    • Malloy won the last time around by 6000 votes. I know there are a lot of PO’d gun owners who may have voted for Malloy that will likely be changing their votes or withholding their votes this go around. Now if the Republicans could just field a half-decent candidate. My dog leaves better candidates on the front lawn every morning, which is why Visconti is getting traction as an independent.

    • The design looks like a third grade diversity studies homework assignment. I was born in the Hartford hospital though raised in the very rural northeast of the state and I am greatly saddened by what has happend to the erosion of rights their. I can recall when my dad took me to the state police barracks in stafford springs in 1964 to get me my pistol permit and being invited to shoot at their range with their guns…. A very different world

      • Wow, I can’t imagine what would happen if you tried to do that today. Probable be invited to the jail cell instead.

  3. Jeez Louise! If they want the streets of freakin’ Hartford to be safe, never mind the guns…get rid of the people!

  4. I wonder if the same people who feel good looking at melted guns feel bad looking at ore that could yet still make into guns. Do they know there is iron in their bodies? While we’re at it, that sculpture could still be made into guns. Or I could just tip it over and crush somebody to death.

  5. Well as much as I love my Detroit, there is no shortage of the ignorant that will eat this crap up. I expect the turnout to be just as large and derpified. Only no New England polititians. Detroit scares the shit out of rich white folk.

    • Doesn’t scare me a bit. A thousand miles away, not likely to get closer. Wait! You mean me go there? Not damn likely. Dunno that means I’m skeered, just isn’t any reason for anyone to go there.

  6. “I’m only laughing on the outside, my smile is just skin-deep. If you could see inside, I’m really crying, you would join me for a weep.”

  7. It’s bad enough that it’s made from mangled firearms, but couldn’t they have at least created a sculpture with some shred of artistic merit or creativity? That thing looks like it was designed by a committee of 4th grade children.

  8. Its Ironic that sculpture actually represents the gesture of two individuals who were armed but showing they have no hidden knives by using their sword hands in a greeting. You gave a man your sword hand in respect to show you weren’t going to stab him underhandedly in your meeting. I guess today’s equivalent gesture would be showing you don’t have a derringer in your hand and the only gun you have is on your hip.

  9. That is beautiful work of art? ……even if it wasn’t made from firearms, that “thing” is horrendous. I guess beauty really is in the eye of the beholder

    • “A sculpture crafted from 2,000 pounds of disassembled guns has gone on display in Hartford’s Bushnell Park through early next year. Artist Michael Kalish spent four years turning the weapons into a handshake, symbolizing community unity.”

      The photo gallery displays the “art” with a white backdrop so the “handshake” is visible.

      Four years?!?!

  10. How about parking it for a few nights on the south side of Chicago or north side of Milwaukee? The “artist” can explain and educate while there. Late night is the best time to reach a broader audience.

  11. Here’s an idea; let’s have a “buy back”, we divide the good guns among us (along with any good parts), take the crap and have it melted down, then have what was melted down turned into brand new guns. We could call it the Circle of Life “buy back”.

  12. Wait…if guns are inherently evil, disassembling them and mangling them into a public specticle (sorry, I count several artists as friends, I know art, and that ain’t it) is not going to change what they really are: demonic killing machines. I fully expect a string of suspicious bad luck for anyone who touches this thing, it’s nothing but pure evil.

  13. When an artist says “it’s supposed to start a conversation” or (even better) takes refuge in the old saw that says great art is confrontational, it’s a clue that regardless of the artistic talent it took (if any) to make the object under view, you’re dealing not with art, but with ideological hackery in visual form.

  14. Connecticut should have an Art Buy-Back Program. Everybody should be encouraged to turn in all their unwanted, broke-ass pseudo artwork for an ammo coupon, no questions asked.

    Velvet Jesus? Check.
    Crappy Monet prints? Check.
    Anything by Peter Max? Quadruple check.
    Kalish Sculpture? No. That’s where we draw the line.

  15. Yea… those antique single shot breakover 410 shotguns are really popular with the criminal element.

    They wanted an “Anti-Violence” sculpture, when really it just looks like the symbolization of an arms deal. Guns + handshake. Honestly like I it. The only thing I don’t like is the destruction of antiques that could have otherwise been restored/repaired.

  16. I love that sculpture. Its practical application is a game changer for sure. Why didn’t anyone think of that before?

    Example application …

    Victim: “Excuse me Mr. Violent Attacker. Rather than savagely and brutally raping me, can we just shake hands and get along?”

    Rapist: “On second thought, I will not savagely and brutally rape you. I just needed a warm handshake to get my head on straight.”

    /end_sarcasm

  17. “…through any means possible, political action, civic action or cultural action [or illegal action, if necessary]”

    Fixed it for him.

  18. Some people might have thought that — if the metalworkers had the insight necessary to have fashioned a more accurate representation of the Nanny-Nation Ideology, they’d have replicated an iron womb, safe enough for children to crawl into and play, of course.
    Others might think it to be a prudent idea to put a fence around it before some child climbs up on it and gets hurt, and as a preventative measure to keep Cult of Death practitioners from potentially using it as a display piece for chopped-off heads.
    For the record though, I’m not one of those people.
    But now that it’s been mentioned, a fence would be a good idea. Especially if they torched this thing into something useful as say, building material for fencing along the southern border.

  19. I am always incredibly leery of people who are “anti-violence” or anti-some other abstract reality of life on planet earth as a human being; war, sickness, etc. More often than not these people are not only dyed in the wool nanny-state worshipers, but they are also more likely to bring violence (the very thing they claim to abhor) upon those who disagree with their over-emotional agenda in any way.

  20. Someone should make a sculpture with two hands holding bars signifying the end result of gun bans and follow around the anti gun agiprop art

  21. Henrietta Beckman said: “It just does something to me to know that those were guns that were used to kill people,” What an ignorant person. This woman believes the guns purchased in the police buy back program were used to kill people. Perhaps that is the problem, there are too many ignorant people out there with a totally false belief system when it comes to firearms.

    • Actually, some of the guns MAY have been used in crimes… The “no questions asked” policy of buybacks means that a criminal could literally just drop off a gun used to perpetrate a crime, and it would be melted down to nothing before the cops could figure out what happened! Quite simply, the system has the ironic effect of promoting gun violence AND making it easier to get away with.

  22. Ahhh……civil disarmament-cum-civic art….

    As Ronald Reagan said of the Berlin Wall, I think it’s as ugly as the idea it represents.

  23. When these guns are “turned in”, are they checked to see if they’ve been reported stolen or been used in a crime? If not, they could be melting evidence or destroying the rightful property of others. Anyone know if they process these?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *