Courtesy of Ammo to Go

Now that Nick has weighed in on his experience with the Barnes 110 gr TAC-TX in his favorite caliber, I’m going to do the same for mine. In this case, the 80 gr. TTSX pill for my .243 WIN. First, a note on accuracy. When I went to Wyoming last year to attend a class at Gunwerks, Aaron Davidson opened things by saying that the best terminally performing bullet in the world is worthless if you can’t put it where you want it. Before I can evaluate a bullet in the real world, it has to put in some range time . . .

Using my Ruger M77 Mark II with a 1:9 twist barrel, I managed to see acceptable “hunting” accuracy from the Barnes loads. There are a couple of companies churning out high quality loads using the 80 gr. TTSX and 85 gr. TSX bullet, but for the purposes of my testing, I used Barnes’ factory load. On any given day using a solid rest, I was able to see no groups larger than 1.5″ in diameter at 100 yards. I use a 10″ x 10″ steel plate for testing and I was able to make it sing with boring regularity at those distances. The story is similar at 200 yards. While I’d love a 1/4 MOA gun, I’m also a realist. My shots usually take place at ranges of less than 150 yards. So 1.5 MOA is perfectly acceptable for the hunting that I do.

Trying out a new hunting bullet is frankly nerve wracking. I’m not big on animal suffering and I don’t hunt with anybody who likes to watch one of God’s creatures struggle in pain. I read everything I could put my hands on in forums and message boards. I also watched a ton of videos of ballistics gel blocks being blown to all hell using Barnes Bullets. So last season, I loaded them up and took to the field.

I only managed to get one doe, but my initial impression was that the 80 gr. TTSX was a hell of a round. I shot my doe while she was facing me head on in a high neck shot to one side of her esophagus. The bullet entered, immediately expanded, and left behind what I can only describe as a completely devastating tunnel of carnage. By the time I got to her, she was stone cold dead from a massive amount of blood loss.

While impressed, I didn’t want to jump to any conclusions too soon. I waited a year and now have two more deer in the freezer thanks to the Barnes TTSX. One, a through and through lung shot placed directly in the middle vertically, and just behind the front shoulder at approximately 80 yards on a decent sized Texas whitetail seen here.


Prior to the Barnes, I was using the 95 gr. Ballistic Silver Tip from Winchester which I had found to be an absolutely devastating round on everything from whitetail to axis, and even sub 200 lb. hogs. The one thing that I liked about the BST was that you could be a little sloppy with shot placement and still be assured of an ethical kill as the bullet was designed to “blow up” on contact. The Barnes bullet isn’t that bullet. Where the BST would liquify lungs, the buck above had a clean hole about half an inch in diameter in his pulmonary system. Definitely a deadly round, but one that requires thoughtful shot placement. I learned that lesson the hard way on the second buck that I took.

My second kill of 2013 (third with the Barnes) was a four-point cull buck. I try to be fairly aggressive in taking cull bucks since I hunt for meat and my neighbors make part of their living from hunters taking trophy deer on their land. In fact, the eight-point I shot this year was the first “big buck” I’ve taken in close to five years.

All that is to say that a typical deer for me in any season in a 100 – 140 lb animal which is most definitively in the CXP2  class of animals. I took this four-point at a touch over 100 yards on a fairly decent downhill shot. One that took long enough to set up that Nick had time to get his camera out and take this photo.

The bullet entered high in the shoulder, broke the joint, continued through and exited the other side. The buck immediately dropped, kicked around for about 10 seconds and then hopped up and started running from left to right. I had already chambered another round so I waited until he stopped and touched off another that put him down for good. This time a bit lower so it actually got his lungs.

I don’t necessarily blame the bullet as I made a pretty crappy shot putting it high in the chest cavity like that. Fortunately, a broken shoulder and a leaking chest cavity would have eventually dropped him, but a second shot did it much faster.

In .243 WIN, the 80 gr. TTSX is a deep penetrating round that reliably expands and offers good accuracy. However, it requires thoughtful shot placement to do its job. I have officially made the switch to all-copper Barnes bullets and have full faith that if I do my part, they will too.

12 Responses to Gear Review: Barnes .243 WIN 80 gr. TTSX

  1. As a young man I ignored the .243. Not enough horsepower for me. I have been giving it a second look of late. More and more my son is dragging me back to the hunting side. He’s going pheasant hunting this week end, my absolute favorite.

    In order to get my license in Ca. I have to take the hunter safety class. I’m signing up for one that will be in January. My initial thought is to shotgun hunt pheasants, quail, etc.

    But if I decide to deer hunt it’s probably time I sidelined my old .30-30. The .243 would be more than enough caliber for the smallish deer we get around here. Easier for a fat old fart to carry, too.

  2. The TSX/TTSX is a truly impressive bullet for me. It shows a significant increase in accuracy over my tried-n-true choice of bullets, the Nosler Partition.

    • Thanks Tyler for a good review- and a question you and Dyspeptic-and tdiinva- who mentioned he’d be interested in that for a custom AR build-

      why the .243?

      Happy Turkey Day!

      • .243 is 6mm.

        The 6mm bullet product space has been given a huge improvement over what it used to have by the benchrest community. There are some seriously low drag, slippery bullets now available in .243, 6.5 (.260) and 7mm (.280 or .284).

        Some of the best .243 pills are in the 100 to 105gr range, which makes for very light recoil.

        • Agreed. I don’t hunt (yet) but SWMBO and I took a long range rifle class in May. After much research, I picked out a .243 Win rifle for her and hand loaded a bunch of 105 grain rounds for her. She has a medical device in her shooting shoulder, so she can’t take much recoil. She was able to handle the recoil of the .243 with no problem.

          And she managed .75 MOA groups at 600 yards. Which was awesome, except she was out shooting me.

  3. I use .270 in 150grains and the performance in deer is more than good enough. I like the flat trajectory the.270 has.

  4. I only shot barnes tsx and ttsx in my 243win howa in South Africa we shoot impala and warthog which is slightly smaller in size then your deer but accuracy is excellent with barnes x at 100meters it is 1\2 inch and still have to have a impala ran one foot on me after been shot (always vital area) have shot to date more than 12 impala already hard to find barnes over here but will not shoot anything else.

  5. Been shooting 130gr 270win for last two years five shots five dead deer none has taken a step I have used everything in the past thirty years the ttsx is amazing shoots so accurate on paper it’s scary go Barnes bullets

  6. Which bullit Hendrix ? I just bought a 243 ruger stainless all weather and going to try for deer this year. 75 yrs old so don’t want to start trying every bullit out there. Thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *