Hackensack, NJ Police Director Michael Mordaga, then and now (courtesy cliffviewpilot.com)

“I support a civilian’s right to bear arms and protect the home and possess firearms,” Michael Mordaga tells northjersey.com, “if allowed to have one.” See what he did there? The civilian director of the Hackensack police supports New Jersey residents’ right to bear arms and protect the home. If a Hackensack resident wants to bear arms outside the home, fuhgeddaboutit. And clock that caveat: “if allowed to have one.” According to who, exactly? Why, the police! Amongst others. Yes, it’s gun ownership as a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma. But there’s no mistaking Mordaga’s end game . . .

Mordaga said he supports citizens’ rights to own firearms and believes criminals can be deterred from committing residential break-ins if they think homeowners have guns. Still, he said, gun control measures must be strengthened to make sure criminals are not able to get firearms — and a national fingerprinting system is a way to accomplish that.

“It should be the same criteria across the country,” he said. “For whoever purchases handguns, there should be a legitimate background check across the country.”

I wonder if Mordaga knows that the FBI has to destroy its NICS firearms background check records within 24 hours, in accordance with the Firearms Owners Protection Act. A piece of legislation that forbids the establishment of a national firearms owners database like the one he’s proposing.

That doesn’t cover state governments like New Jersey who maintain a firearms registration. Connecticut, California, Hawaii—all these states know what guns resident bought, where they live and keeps a copy of their fingerprints on file.

Reading the northjersey.com article, listening to former Detective Mordaga, you’d think that’s a feature, not a bug. As the son of a Holocaust survivor I can assure you it’s not. How many times do we have to watch gun registration lead to gun confiscation lead to tyranny and mass murder before we appreciate the fact that firearms anonymity protects liberty? Registration is the slippery slope to the abyss.

“If you go to fingerprinting, you infringe on [the] privacy rights and constitutional rights of every American, but the criminal will find a way to get around it,” said Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation, a gun-rights group.

Gottleib alludes to the horrific dangers of gun registration but doesn’t quite go there. He trots out the standard gun rights media meme: “expanding” firearms background checks won’t work. As the NSSF and NRA say, “we need to fix the current system first.” Wrong. The system needs to be eliminated. All of it. Everywhere. Background checks don’t work. Period.

I know that’s not a politically palatable position. But attempting to thread the needle—turning a blind eye to the ATF’s registry (form 4473) and states that maintain a firearms owners database while calling fingerprinting an invasion of privacy—makes gun rights groups look stupid. We support the system but we don’t want to improve it? Geddowdahere!

“We find it’s still beneficial for the state to have its own strong system to keep guns out of the hands of criminals,” said Daniel Weber, director of the Center for Gun Policy and Research at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. “While it’s not foolproof, it elevates the street price and makes it generally less available.”

When incrementalist idiots like this seem to make more sense than the gun rights groups we got trouble.

As for the former cop’s story—a criminal attempted to kill Mordaga, the con changed his name in prison and bought firearms illegally 24 years later in Virginia—so what? The tale proves Gottleib’s point, not Mordaga’s. Besides, a man who doesn’t understand the difference between Little League rules and a natural, civil and Constitutionally protected right shouldn’t be making decision about anything more than where to spend his police pension.

“People get fingerprinted when they want to become coaches in Little League,” he said. “People get fingerprinted for a lot of different things . . . no one should be against being fingerprinted if they want to have firearms.”

Unless they value their life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

Recommended For You

52 Responses to Hackensack, NJ Police Director Calls for National Gun Buyer Fingerprinting

  1. I applied for my concealed carry permit today in Rhode Island. I had to be fingerprinted, and its a damned shame that its required by statutory law (11-47-11). Criminals are fingerprinted for booking, carry permit applicants and holders don’t deserve this kind of treatment.

    • My local PD took me to the holding cell area (deserted, I live in a nice small town), where they keep the fingerprinting equipment. Washington has no training requirement, but you still get the printing and additional background check. Constitutional carry, a nice daydream. 🙂

  2. I’d like to run a background check on Mordaga. Please ask him to send me his social security number and fingerprints. I promise that I won’t misuse them.

  3. Been to Hackensack lately ? I’m willing to bet there are a lot of people carrying firearms there and not a one are on the old police cheif’s sanctioned list. ” I support civil rights, but you have to exercise them in a manner I deem appropriate.” Hey Chief…FOAD.

  4. Michael Mordaga tells legal gun owners:

    “And I will wait for you
    As long as I need to
    And if you ever get back to Hackensack
    I’ll be here to arrest you”

  5. Few slight adjustments to make it palatable to the ACLU…

    “Mordaga said he supports citizens’ right to vote and believes criminals can be deterred from committing voter fraud if they think poll workers have the tools to deter them. Still, he said, vote control measures must be strengthened to make sure those who commit voter fraud are not able to vote illegally — and a national fingerprinting system is a way to accomplish that.

    “It should be the same criteria across the country,” he said. “For whoever votes, there should be a legitimate background check across the country.”

    • What could go wrong with a national registry check database? After all, look how successfully the national healthcare exchange is being implemented.

  6. Of all the petty little things that have to get reported to NICS, name changes are not among them? You get a ticket out of state and it goes to a warrant, reported.
    You catch a DUI in some states, reported. Your girlfriend claims you threatened her, reported. You try to kill a cop, spend years in prison, convert to islam, and change your name; GOOD TO GO!?!?

  7. This a-hole is calling us civilians as if he were a military man? I really tired of the military direction the hired help is taking.

    • Yes, well it’s pretty obvious these guys have some serious self-esteem issues in Jersey, otherwise why wear all those pretty fruit salad medals every time they’re in uniform? They must give those away like Cracker-Jack prizes. It’s no wonder they have to try to conceive themselves as elite troops protecting the civilians.

  8. When I clicked on the website and took a quick glance at the photo, I thought I was looking at Heinrich Himmler without his glasses. Oy vey! Keep your propaganda in Hackensack.

  9. Sorry, New Jersey, you lost your right to any kind of lawful credibility when you started wiping your rears with the Constitution.

  10. In CA it is just the right thumb print….and frankly none of the ones I have given are readable. Just smudges.

    I think the politicians pass a law, but no one really gives a hoot about actually implementing these thing. My fingerprints have been more fussed over for a backrgound check for teaching than for a firearm.

    • Same. They went all out on my fingerprinting for the two schools I work in, but the right thumb thing was purely an act. A dark oval rubbed over and passed off as legitimate.

  11. What I’d like to ask him is, if one already has their fingerprints on file
    as well as an active security clearance why do you even need a
    background check. The next question would be, would you be allowed
    to view your own background file or will it be sealed (a la terror watch
    list). Lastly, if the background registry gets anything wrong will the
    federal government be held legally liable for any issues (either a
    felon being okayed, or an innocent being banned from ownership).

    Unfortunately I imagine he’s got a bloody shirt ready and waiting for
    the first logical question posed.

  12. I have witnessed a background check prevent a felon from acquiring a gun. Saying they don’t work is an overly broad generalization.

    • Good thing he was stopped, now that he knows he can’t own one, he knows better than to steal one or buy one out of the back of a Pinto in a dark alley, or worst of all possible cases, get someone to buy it for him at the exact same store.

      Because, of course, the ATF will come after him with everything they’ve got. Straw purchases don’t go unpunished in this country, right?

    • How do you know he was a felon? NICS (nor FDLE here in Fl) give a reason for denial. It could be something simple like a misdemeanor restraining order or failure to appear for a speeding ticket bench warrant. It could even be a mistake.

  13. The Government does not have a duty to protect the individual, just a duty to protect society as a whole. Therefore, according to Constitutional law, the right for individual self defense is there.

  14. I ask this out of ignorance, so bear with me. Do they really delete all the background check stuff after 24 hours? Reeeeally dispose of it? Or is it like dragging something on your desktop into the trash can and its not really gone?

    • Of course they do, it’s the law.

      In reality, if the checks are being done electronically, then it’s probably automated. It runs a check every hour, or every day at midnight, and any records with timestamps >23:59 ago are purged.

      • I ask because its sort of a “who will watch the watchers” deal. I’d love to believe that because they’re a government agency operating under the rule of law they’d be honest about it, but given so many instances of .gov sneakiness, I wouldn’t put it past them to say they’ve disposed of everything when really they haven’t. An automated system that deletes info would be a good way to go, but could such a system be modified so that instead of automatically ‘deleting’ things, it switched over to automatically ‘saving’ that info? I bow to your (vastly) superior knowledge of The Internet, and Technology.

      • Yes, I’m sure the FBI dumps the data every night, and right before that happens it gets copied over to ATF databases (or some obscure agency). Oregon state police run the checks here aka they take the data down and then run it through the FBI, $10 per check for the buyer. I’m sure Oregon has all the data on guns checks run through their system saved.

        • It would really be good to catch them because they could be charged with a felony at the fed level and some state levels including here in Florida.

  15. He’s the Modern-day “SS” officer: Power hungry and more than ready to ensure that the masses have no ability to resist police power. FOAD.

  16. Eh, background checks will stop plenty of criminals who can then go purchase illegally so it’s efficacy is suspect.

    For those who want the checks gone, what do you propose for deterring/stopping psychos and the dangerous from getting guns? Saying “there’s nothing we can do!” Is not a real answer.

  17. The uniform photo of this peckerwood would look good next to Hitler and Musollini. All he needs is a black band with SS on the sleeve.

  18. I bet Hackensack wouldn’t stand a half a day confined out among the real voting citizens !!! Mrs. Hackensack would be more appropriate for his/her new name…..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *