Incendiary Image of the Day: Nooooooooo! Edition

Bent Smith (courtesy Reuters)

I detest gun buybacks. Not only are they anti-gun agitprop—security theater for politically correct politicians bent on civilian disarmament—but they destroy tens of thousands of perfectly good guns at taxpayers’ expense (even when we’re “just” paying for police overtime and adding to their po-po’s pension payout). foxnews.com used this image above their story Colorado recall vote on gun control without mail ballots changes dynamicThe caption reads “FILE: July 30, 2013: A deputy sheriff looks at a disabled gun to be melted down at a gun buy-back program in Los Angeles, Calif. (REUTERS).” Which kinda implies the sheriff’s department “disabled” this revolver pre-melt down. What kind of animal would do that to a [now identified as a Rossi] wheelgun ?  [NB: I refuse to accept the possibility that a gun owner abused this piece ahead of its untimely end.] It just goes to show you that the people running gun buybacks have no respect for history, art or Americans’ natural, civil and Constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms. As if you didn’t know.

comments

  1. avatar michael n says:

    noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    1. avatar Dean Weingarten says:

      The term “buyback” is an Orwellian term. An entity cannot buy back something it never owned.

      http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2013/08/four-owellian-word-usages-in-gun-control.html

  2. avatar Joe says:

    Tis but a flesh wound! It could be fixed!

    1. avatar Augur says:

      Gentlemen, we can rebuild it. We have the technology. We have the capability to build the world’s first bionic gun. This survivor will be that gun. Better than it was before. Better, stronger, faster.

      1. avatar blahpony says:

        Bananananananang!

    2. avatar Denny says:

      That’s right she fixable but I’m no gunsmith. But? Check the frame and other components for true. Slap a new barrel on her. Then Function test and the test fire on a bad guy buy a bad guy, any death row volunteers?

      1. avatar Bryan says:

        You don’t need a new barrel. To me this looks like a new Snubby in the making!

  3. avatar Layne says:

    The only thing disabled on it is the accuracy. It’s still very much an implement of death in that configuration.

    One wonders why animal shelters don’t kill your unwanted animals on the spot right in front of you. These guns were very adoptable and could have found loving homes.

    1. avatar Lucas D. says:

      Not if it pinched the barrel, then it’s an instrument of finger-blowing-offing for whoever tries to use it.

      Either way, it’s a got-danged tragedy to me.

  4. avatar Mike S says:

    That’s the saddest thing I’ve seen all day.

    1. avatar Ropingdown says:

      The cop’s shamelessly displayed beer gut summarizes the cultural tragedy.

      1. avatar thatoneguy says:

        Ha! You beat me to it. Maybe it was his and he rolled over on it.

        1. avatar Russ Bixby says:

          Made me fu¢king scream! Nice!!!

        2. avatar JeremyR says:

          Sat on it. Poor thing, it was just a baby. It had a full life ahead of it, snuffed out by too many jelly donuts. Speaking of which, do you know why there are so many cops lurking arround construction zones? The signs says Donot pass. Bad, I know, but the day is young.

  5. avatar jwm says:

    Envious of it’s barrel length, no doubt. It disturbs me also to see a Webley or other historic firearm for sale in england that has been “de-activated” murder, I call it.

    1. avatar Dean Weingarten says:

      Someone I know rescued a Smith & Wesson .44 Russian Top Break from a Phoenix “buyback” It was functional in double action. He bought it for $20. Unfortunately, a WWII war trophy Lugar in original holster was turned in for a $100 gift card.

      http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2013/05/azphoenix-gun-turn-in-buyback-rolling.html

      1. avatar Russ Bixby says:

        Christ! In Phoenix?!? Any dealer would have given the moron ten times that in a heartbeat!

        That’s just wrong.

        1. avatar Dean Weingarten says:

          At the first Phoenix turn in this May, I went in to ask some questions about procedure, and I wanted to take some picutures. An older lady walked in with me, grocerly type bag in hand. I asked her what she was turning in. She said that her husband had been in WWII, and that he had a handgun that he had carried with him when they were in the desert, and that he had used it to defend them (at least once), but now he had passed and she just wanted to get rid of it.

          I managed to get a quick look in the bag before we got to the official turn in table. All I could see was a WWII German type holster. At the table I asked to take pictures. Denied. I asked to see what she was turning in. The police officer asked me to leave. I told the widow that her pistol was probably worth at least $400. She did not care.

          She just wanted to “get rid of it”, and she did not want to sell it, she wanted to turn it in to be destroyed.

          I never did find out what was in the holster. Could have been a Luger, could have been a Lahti or one of the medium sized Mausers (not a broomhandle), possibly a P38…

          On the second turn in, I saw an actual Luger and original holster turned in. Sad. I did take pictures of that one.. even the serial number.

          I wrote it all up on the series of articles I did on the three turn in events at Gun Watch.

          http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2013/05/azphoenix-early-gun-turn-in-buyback.html

        2. avatar Matt in FL says:

          Dean, I just read your posts about the Phoenix buybacks, and then I had to go take my dog for a walk to remember that there are still good things in this world, because the pictures made me sad.

      2. avatar Dyspeptic Gunsmith says:

        Dean, whoever got that Colt Delta 10mm got a GREAT deal.

        FWIW, if you know the person, advise them to keep to the “FBI loads” which are lighter. People who went full-bore 10mm in those Delta Elites found their frames started to develop cracks after awhile.

        An uncracked Colt Delta Elite is going to be worth some serious money someday.

  6. avatar rammerjammer says:

    I think that may be a Taurus and not an S&W.

    Still wrong no matter how you look at it.

    1. avatar jwm says:

      Yeah, it looks more Taurus than Smith.

      1. avatar ensitue says:

        llAMA

    2. avatar Gunenthusiast says:

      That is a Rossi Model 851. Copy of a Colt Python Style vent rib Barrel with S&W release and functioning. I cringe when I see pictures like this.

      1. avatar jwm says:

        Did a quick interwebz search and yes, it looks like a Rossi 851.

  7. avatar Adam says:

    Isn’t that one of those expensive new fangled corner guns that high speed units use?????????

  8. avatar Lucas D. says:

    Maybe, just maybe, it’s the revolver Frank Castle tried to use on The Russian in the ’04 Punisher flick. That’s the only explanation that makes any sense to me.

    1. avatar Nigil says:

      IIRC, frank’s backup wheelgun was a more of a 4″ barrel, and I think had a black grip.
      Here’s hoping this one was some sort of tragic accident involving a tow truck and some hydraulics.

  9. avatar Nine says:

    My God…

    A travesty I tell you…

  10. avatar Mike H says:

    If my old man saw this, he’d be in tears.

  11. avatar DaveM says:

    Taking a SWAG here that the revolver was worth more than a grocery store gift card
    Can’t fix stupid

    1. avatar ChuckN says:

      Even damaged I bet it was worth more.

  12. avatar NCG says:

    I wonder if some moron did manage to do this to his own gun in some sort of meth-fueled amateur gunsmithing episode (dude, you use the torch to, like, adjust the barrel for accuracy), then figured he might as well cash in on the buyback.

  13. avatar cj texas says:

    that made me woozy…

  14. avatar Chris says:

    I feel like setting up a booth in front of every gun buyback and handing out pamphlets. “It’s not a choice, it’s a firearm.” “You can shoot it, we can help.”

  15. avatar RandallOfLegend says:

    I was scared it was a Colt Python, then I breathed a sigh of relief

    1. avatar Jan says:

      That was my first thought, until I read the Rossi comment. Still tragic, but not catastrophic.

  16. avatar SCS says:

    That’s just plain mean.

  17. avatar Matt in FL says:

    That photo makes me sad.

    Send it to Dyspeptic Gunsmith and have him cut and recrown it into a 2″ barrel blaster? Oh the sound we can make!

    1. avatar Dyspeptic Gunsmith says:

      Looking at it as closely as I can, I think the barrel is a complete loss. The frame, from what I see in the picture, might well be OK.

      1. avatar John L. says:

        Maybe.

        Depends on where they gripped it to get the leverage. And after that, I’m not sure I’d ever really trust it again. Not its fault, but still.

        1. avatar Russ Bixby says:

          From the dimple, I’d say they stuck it in a REBAR bender and tugged on the lever.

          Easy way to destroy anything, even a shottie.

          The frame should be fine.

  18. avatar Chris says:

    Why don’t the blue states offer gun buy back and then allow the red states to auction off the good stuff and do your little FFL transfer and BG check?

  19. avatar AznMike says:

    A moment of silence please…

    1. avatar Samuel Suggs says:

      I see what you did there 🙂 http://instantostrich.com/

  20. avatar Don says:

    Not what I needed to see on my birthday. No 20th century gun more soul than a S&W revolver.

  21. avatar John L. says:

    Cool! It’s one of those shoot-around-the-corner WWII-bad-guy-style assault revolvers!

    Oh wait, I was thinking of the Krummlauf (http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krummlauf).

    This is just … sad.

  22. avatar Jeh says:

    I may be sick…horrifying what they’ve done to it.

  23. avatar CA.Ben says:

    I’m betting that the gun owner backed over it with his truck, and figured he’d rather take the $100 than try to fix it. Usually when they destroy guns at these things they use chopsaws, not bending machines.

    Still, what a loss!

    1. avatar Russ Bixby says:

      Wouldn’t look like that

      Jig and hammer or REBAR bender. My bet’s on the latter, at eight to three.

  24. avatar Gov. William J. Le Petomane says:

    Kind of reminds me of that time the Taliban blew up the 1400 year old carving of Buddha in the side of that mountain.

    Well, might be resorting to hyperbole there…

    1. avatar Russ Bixby says:

      Nope. I was thinking the same thing.

      Destroying historic art because it violates some precept of ones faith.

      What I was thinking was the Conquistadores and Mayan temples, but six of one.

      1. avatar Gov. William J. Le Petomane says:

        The only mitigating factor is that a Rossi revolver isn’t exactly irreplaceable. Same mentality though.

        From a macroeconomic point of view it never makes sense to willfully destroy wealth. Like the broken window parable, sure it’s good for the glazier (or gun maker), but it’s bad for whoever lost business because someone had to spend their money on a new window (or revolver) instead buying their product.

  25. avatar Russ Bixby says:

    Shite!

    Interrogative: If these yoyos are planning to destroy the thing anyway, why go to the trouble of mutilating it?

    Do they smash each gun at take-in, just to prevent the buyers from skimming the take?

    Tragic. Truly and supremely ugly behaviour.

  26. avatar Cubby123 says:

    Don’t Worry, we’ll make more.

    1. avatar Derrick says:

      I like the enthusiasm. And perhaps a few accessories to go with that new revolver…..

  27. avatar Ardent says:

    It’s disturbing when someone intentionally destroys an object with intrinsic value due to their demagogic ideology. What torturing small animals is to psychopathology this is to tyranny. It’s even more insane when one considers that more new guns are sold each day than are destroyed. So much cost and effort to destroy useful property in the face of it’s availability increasing rather than decreasing. At the point one is destroying guns on the spot the matter has left the realm of the political and entered that of the delusional.

    While I’ve always maintained that liberalism is more a form of mental disorder than legitimate political thought this sort of thing should given everyone pause. To support and elect people who consider it a service and a virtue to waste the public’s resources destroying the valuable property of it’s citizens is to invite the inmates to run the asylum.

  28. avatar Gregg says:

    Why don’t we start our own Turn-in programs then auction off the guns to members? There’s no law that says that only the LEOS have to do it.

  29. Maine police do a turn in event sell the guns to a dealer, turn the proceeds over to charity:

    http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2013/02/mepolice-agencies-offer-firearm-safety.html

    1. avatar Nigil says:

      I think it’s good that local police are willing to take guns people don’t want; I think you should be able to walk in a station at any time with an unwanted gun and just hand it over, no questions asked. They can sell it and pay for department costs or take it apart and throw it in a scrapper for all I would care.
      What bugs the crap out of me is when they organize whole days of it, and pay for the guns, and pretend like it’s making the city safer. Hypocritical nonsense.

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email