Feinstein: “It’s Legal to Hunt Humans”

This one’s gone viral, ‘natch: Senator Dianne Feinstein’s assertion that it’s legal to hunt humans with high capacity (i.e. standard capacity) ammunition magazines. Har-har. But seriously folks, where’s the scientific study that establishes a connection between magazine capacity and lethality and/or the chances of mid-incident intervention? If we’re relying on anecdotal evidence, Aurora madman James Holmes’ 100-round magazine jammed, forcing him to switch to a second weapon, opening the window of opportunity Ms. Feinstein was prattling on about. If Holmes had had a lower capacity, more reliable mag, he could have swapped mags in seconds and continued the carnage. In short, Democrats disarming civilians based on baseless conjecture, stripping Americans of their Constitutionally-protected right to keep and bear arms. Whose hunting whom here?

comments

  1. avatar TulipCity says:

    http://i.gifeye.com/679.gif

    I’m sure this is what we all are feeling.

  2. avatar Ray says:

    Hmmm, is there a bag limit? And do they taste like chicken?

    1. avatar IdahoPete says:

      More like rattlesnake.

    2. avatar neiowa says:

      What is the method for hunting marxists/progressives/RINOs? Work like trap/skeet with a big thrower or is more a fox/hounds think. Freefire/gunfree zones is so not sporting whatever the mag size.

      Note: RINOs smell like jackass, taste like chicken.

    3. avatar Rebecca says:

      Surely you’ve heard of “long pig”? That’s the slang for human meat. And barbequing was invented for cooking that very meat – low and slow – to get it tender and tasty. I hear most animals don’t like the taste “on the hoof”, so to speak.

  3. avatar John says:

    The only humans who “hunt humans” don’t give a $#!% about a legal magazine capacity limit.

  4. avatar SkyMan77 says:

    DiFi…Doing her evil headed best to lead lambs to slaughter longer then I can remember. This kind of misdirection is akin to “Hey little girl can you help me find my puppy?”

  5. avatar Thomas Paine says:

    ok ok. I’ll concede to a three round limit for hunting humans. Where do i get my permit?

    1. avatar Billy Wardlaw says:

      LOL!

  6. avatar Bill F says:

    All politicians lie and mislead. They should only be allowed to write or speak a certain, reasonable number of words per term. Every misrepresentation could cause their allotted word count to deplete at a much faster rate. Then, the more they lie, the quicker they have to sit down and STFU for the remainder of their term.

    1. avatar Jim R says:

      I think 10 words is reasonable. No Congressman should need more than 10 words, right?

      1. avatar Sebudei says:

        7 in New York.

    2. avatar IdahoPete says:

      Could I interest you in shares in my new company? We will be producing a new and exciting line of portable guillotines, so you can eliminate those pesky politicians with French NUANCE!!! And European sophistication!

  7. avatar JeffW says:

    Government enforced Gun Free Zones are doing a nice job providing the Human Hunting Preserves.

  8. avatar Jay Goldblum says:

    “If Holmes had had a lower capacity, more reliable mag, he could have swapped mags in seconds and continued the carnage.” Frankenfeinstein now uses that statement to lower magazine capacity to two rounds….

  9. avatar Roadrunner says:

    Except she’s lying. Murder is still illegal, no matter how many rounds a magazine will hold.

    1. avatar In Memphis says:

      So is firing warning shots. Probably not much sympathy when you hit your kid or dog firing blindly through a door either.

  10. avatar jwm says:

    Now we come to the meat of the matter. When fudds hunt humans do they use only traditional hunting guns and disdain those that hunt humans with AR’s and AK’s? Do they recognize humans as worthy of trophy status or do they consider them as an invasive species and only fit to be culled as vermin?

    Is it humane to use traps and snares for humans or would PETA have a conniption?

    1. avatar Gyufygy says:

      PETA’s SOP is conniption first, ask non-rhetorical questions later.

      1. avatar Rebecca says:

        PETA’s SOP is conniption first, ask non-rhetorical hysterical questions later.

        There, fixed it for ya. 🙂

    2. avatar Billy Wardlaw says:

      PETA has been very clear that it values animal life above that of human life. My guess is they would be in support of hunting humans.

  11. avatar Captain Catsup says:

    Psychopaths kill the innocent, but leave people like DiFi alone out of professional courtesy. She’s nuking futz!

  12. avatar Rich says:

    Hmm… I just checked every state hunting reg here in MO and I couldn’t find a single word regarding a season, limits, or methods regarding hunting humans. I’m beginning to suspect she may have her facts wrong…

    *snark*

  13. avatar Gyufygy says:

    That’s a… novel interpretation of the law.

    If it wasn’t for her pushing as hard as she can for these laws, I’d really wonder if she’s even trying anymore. Getting lazy, maybe? Or is she slowing down in her old age?

  14. avatar Randy Drescher says:

    Hunting humans, she just said that so she would be safe. Feinswine just can’t get a grip on that public servant thing, no matter, she’s getting a good edjumpcation, Randy

  15. avatar Cort says:

    So I don’t mind being that guy. It’s “who’s hunting whom,” at the end of that little article. 🙂

    But seriously. Feinstein’s silly. She makes me laugh.

  16. avatar kb says:

    Like in Hard Target?

  17. avatar Dan S says:

    I’m thinking more like The Most Dangerous Game

  18. avatar Lance says:

    Prove she is as dumb as she is ugly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! By the way I guess “Slow Joe” Biden’s mindset is the liberals norm. Watch out brainlessness is a virus now

  19. avatar Bart says:

    Where do you get a Human Hunting License ?

  20. avatar beachfitrob says:

    “Bang!” Ow! Ow! Socialized Medicine! Sorta paraphrasing an old Doonesbury when Duke IIRC is hunting liberals. “Hard to find in the wild these days.” Or something like that.

  21. avatar ExMonk says:

    Shhh!!! Be vewy qwiet. I’m hunting wabbits humans.

    Nah. Just doesn’t work as a catchphrase.

    But seriously, it’s all about the dramatic soundbite, isn’t it? “Legal to hunt humans” is pure gun-grabber gold. For anyone with any sense though, it’s just a steaming pile of excrement. Pathetic.

    1. avatar ExMonk says:

      My wife just pointed out to me that it is legal to hunt humans. Provided, that is, that you are the federal government and you use drones.

  22. avatar Silver says:

    Boy, if we just keep letting her talk, she may discredit herself to an insane point that no one listens to her, like Michael Moore.

    Of course, I may be having too much faith in the American public.

  23. avatar Ralph says:

    I just got my human license renewed in MA. I can take a buck and a doe, but only with a shotgun and only from my balcony.

    1. avatar jwm says:

      Be careful, Ralph. According to fish and Game regs you can only hunt humans with a Double Bidened Shotgun. Mustn’t run afoul of the regs.

  24. avatar Accur81 says:

    “Legal to hunt humans…” is one of the most asinine things I have ever heard from some who is not considered legally retarded. Perhaps she should be.

    1. avatar Accur81 says:

      Oi. Criticized DiFi (again) and failed to properly compose my own comment. Mea culpa.

  25. avatar Greg Camp says:

    Dianne Frankenstein says that she wants magazine capacity limited so when the wacko shooter stops to reload, all the unarmed victims can tackle him. But didn’t she carry a gun precisely for the purpose of shooting back at said wacko?

    1. avatar AlphaGeek says:

      That was then. This is now.

      Besides, how DARE YOU question the judgment of your betters, you filthy commoner?

      {/sarc}

  26. avatar anonymous says:

    Maybe she’s thinking about espisode 1 of “Return To The Planet of the Apes”

    Between 2:30 and 4:35 of the following video clip

    the ape council is debating how to deal with the “human crisis”. One faction wants to exteriminate the humans. The other faction wants to preserve humanity for study.

    In what other Saturday morning cartoon would the characters talk about hunting humans for “legitimate sport” (at 3:50 )?

    Today’s cartoons aren’t preparing kids for the post-apocalypse, the way that “Planet of the Apes” and “Thundar the Barbarian” did.

  27. avatar JAS says:

    Pssst! Senator… Humans are a lot harder to kill than ducks!

    I watched the video and I am truly embarrassed to be an American today. With representation like hers we are the laughingstock of the world.

  28. avatar racer88 says:

    I just KNEW that there was something about “tourist season” that was just escaping me. Is there a bag limit?

  29. avatar 3rd Infantrygrunt says:

    This woman is as crazy as an f’n SHITHOUSE RAT. Does she realize that there are literally MILLIONS of those evil 30 round magazines already in circulation, ones she says she will not ban. There has honest to God got to be something in the water in Kalifornicat which turns your brains into runny shits.

  30. avatar 3rd Infantrygrunt says:

    This idiotic woman is as crazy as an f’n SHITHOUSE RAT. Does she realize that there are literally MILLIONS of those evil 30 round magazines already in circulation, ones she says she will not ban. There has honest to God got to be something in the water in Kalifornicat which turns your brains into runny shits.

  31. avatar Dave S says:

    Lets face it, they just dont want there prey armed and returning fire!

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email