Gun Review: Ruger SR45

Ruger SR45 semi-automatic handgun (courtesy The Truth About Guns)

Whenever I hear the letter combination “SR” I think of the SR-71 Blackbird, the sexiest object ever created by hand of man. While the Ruger SR45 doesn’t quite achieve the legendary spy plane’s height of horniness, it is, nonetheless, a deeply desirable ballistic battler. It’s the kind of gun that reminds a Glock guy why he’s like a happily married man; constantly reminding his high school buddies that looks aren’t everything. True dat. At the end of the day (or the muzzle) a gun’s got to git ‘er done. Does the Ruger SR45′s performance and utility match its suave demeanor? Yes and no. But first a little more about the Ruger SR45′s siren song . . .

Ruger SR45 boxed (courtesy The Truth About Guns)

In the same way that a tall woman can make even the most style-challenged dress seem drop-dead gorgeous, the jumbo-sized SR45 elevates the already comely SR series to supermodel status. The big Ruger’s a perfectly scaled and wonderfully proportioned minimalist classic. The indent on the slide at the muzzle end shows its designer’s attention to detail. The handgun’s bold graphics, grip-angle aligned slide striations and fine-checkering make it Ermenegildo Zegna of semis.

Ruger SR45 top view (courtesy The truth About Guns)

The SR45 may look tall and tan and young and lovely but the gun is something of an optic illusion. The big Ruger’s exactly the same width as the sine qua non of full-size .45-caliber striker-fired polymer pistols: the 1.27″ wide Glock 21. Even though the American pistol holds three fewer cartridges than Gaston’s handiwork (10 vs. 13), an unloaded SR45 is almost four ounces heavier than a G21 (30.15 vs. 26.8 ounces). That said, no full-size .45 is for the feint of hip.

The SR45′s handle offers enough grip space to accomodate a gorilla-sized support hand. With plenty ‘o heft and a low bore axis, muzzle flip’s a moot point. As you’d expect from a modern gun at this price point, accuracy’s not an issue. Exploiting a sight radius longer than the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway, peering through remarkably useful adjustable three-dot sights, your humble scribe fired 11 rounds on a sheet of computer paper at 10 yards in less than three seconds. I also shot a mag’s worth of bullets through the same hole at five yards. [That's Steve above and below.]

The SR45′s trigger accounts for much of my mad shooting skilz. The semi-automatic handgun’s go-pedal has none of the grit that bedeviled the SR40; it’s as smooth as a snifter of Speyside. Rhode Islanders will be pleased with the trigger’s relatively short travel in both directions. And Glock guys will be happy with the solid CLICK on reset. Unfortunately, the SR45′s trigger has no appreciable breaking point. At some point in the squeezing process the thing just goes off.  The surprise break is great for square range marksmanship but not so great for self-defense . . .

You’re pushing the SR45 out during a defensive gun use (DGU). The bad guy’s in your sights. Your finger is on the trigger. You squeeze your index finger to “register” the trigger. You decide not to fire. Only you do, anyway. Or the bad guy’s moving. You’re squeezing the big Ruger’s trigger slightly, subconsciously deciding on the exact moment to fire. Only you shoot a fraction of a second too early. Or a moment too late. And yes, “average” armed self-defenders can make such fine distinctions—even or especially under stress.

Ruger SR45 safety (courtesy The Truth About Guns)

And then there’s still the SR45′s ergonomic issues: the largest member of the SR family retains Chicklet-sized external switches. It takes enormous pressure and dexterity to work the SR45′s minuscule slide stop. You can sweep off the SR45′s safety easily enough. Putting it back on with your thumb is like trying to play chopsticks with one hand. During an adrenalin dump, when fingers turn to flippers, you’d be SOL. If you want to re-holster your gun in a safe condition after a DGU, fuhgeddaboudit.

All American Ruger SR45 (courtesy The Truth About Guns)

I’m also no fan of any self-defense handgun whose sights are round-edged at the front; you can’t cycle the gun with the heel of your shoe. But that’s me. Zooming out, we’re talking about an all-American polymer pistol that’s a full Franklin cheaper than the Austrian alternative; a 1911-sized gun that’s Helena Svedin to Glock’s Rosie O’Donnell (and Springfield’s Predator-styled XD). And while the big Ruger may not match the Glock’s proven reliability, yet, the SR45 ate a thousand rounds of mixed brand ammo like Adam Richman downing sliders.

If you’re a capacity-relaxed buyer who wants to carry a cool-looking big ass .45 with a proper-sized external safety I’d recommend stumping-up another $90 for the Smith & Wesson M&P45 (soon to feature the Shield’s most excellent trigger). Or save-up another three bills for a drop-dead gorgeous Ruger SR1911. That said, if you’re a sucker for a pretty gun it’s best to buy a Ruger SR45 sooner rather than later. The big semi doesn’t go Mach 3 but I reckon it’ll sell mach schnell. Whether it’s high-flying military machines or large-caliber firearms, sex appeal is its own reward.

The SR45 for this review was provide by The Kentucky Gun Company

SPECIFICATIONS:

Caliber: 45 Auto
Grip Frame: Black, High Performance, Glass-Filled Nylon
Sights: Adjustable 3-Dot
Barrel Length: 4.50″
Length:8.00″
Height: 5.75″
Width: 1.27″
Weight: 30.15 ounces unloaded
Capacity:
Price: $529 msrp

RATINGS (Out of Five Stars)

Style * * * * *
Sexy.

Ergonomics (carry) * *
Big, wide, heavy, long.

Ergonomics (firing) * * * *
Minimum muzzle flip, OFWG-friendly three-dot sights. Smooth trigger doesn’t break cleanly enough for self-defense work.

Reliability * * * * *
One-thousand rounds of mixed ammo. No problems.

Customize This * * * * *
Lights and lasers on their way.

OVERALL RATING * * *
A reliable, accurate, good-looking gun that doesn’t “get” self-defense.

avatar

About Robert Farago

Robert Farago is the Publisher of The Truth About Guns (TTAG). He started the site to explore the ethics, morality, business, politics, culture, technology, practice, strategy, dangers and fun of guns.

71 Responses to Gun Review: Ruger SR45

  1. avatarRKBA says:

    “Slide Release”?

    What is that?

    One should never use the ‘Slide Lock’ as a ‘Slide Release’.

    Never.

    • avatarRobert Farago says:

      I don’t. People do, so it’s a problem. Still, text amended.

    • avatarST says:

      Not this crap again.

      The “Slide Lock/Slide Release” debate is pointless.

      You run your gun your way, Ill run my gun my way. Either way, the bad guy won’t care.

      • avatarRKBA says:

        ST, you are more than welcome to run your gun your way. Far be it for me to think you would run your gun any other way.

        Still, many shooters have yet to be informed of the true function of the ‘Slide Lock’, and the potential hazards of using it for any other purpose, especially releasing the slide into battery.

        Any reputable defensive gun training program will advise you to not use the slide lock as a slide release, because the recoil spring will not be fully compressed and will therefore (potentially) not have the correct energy required to properly strip and chamber a cartridge from the magazine while returning the slide to full battery.

        To accomplish this task properly without risking ‘short stroke’ failures, the slide should be pulled back fully, and released, without riding it home.

        Sure, the difference may only be an eighth or a quarter of an inch in slide travel, but the recoil spring is storing a lot of energy during that final compression, energy the firearm engineers calculated as being necessary to guarantee flawless operation.

        And, yes, no gun is ‘flawless’, but why learn bad habits that can (and will) contribute only to the list of potential failure scenarios when your life is on the line?

        • avatarHasdrubal says:

          I know SWAT officers who use it as a slide release with no problems. If the gun runs properly that way, I don’t see a problem with it, though I don’t do it myself.

          I think the bigger danger is that it’s a fine motor skill, and even if the gun works, you might not do it right under stress unless you practice a lot.

        • avatarChuck J says:

          There are many reputable trainers that teach depressing the slide lock/release to get the gun back in battery in a slide-lock reload.

          This is a matter in which people can arrive at valid yet contradicting conclusions.

        • avatarJMS says:

          “…energy the firearm engineers calculated as being necessary to guarantee flawless operation”

          Can’t agree with you on this assumption. There are guns that the factory claims were specifically designed (by the engineers) for using that little button as a release as well as a lock. Your statement almost certainly does apply to some models, but it certainly does not apply to all.

          Heck, there are guns that are specifically designed to drop the slide from lock upon insertion of a loaded magazine.

          Some gun manuals do not say one way or the other, but the distance you can retract the slide beyond where it rests on the lock is so incredibly small as to have nearly no measurable difference in spring tension or slide speed upon release (and, yes, I actually do have experience designing springs). Heck, considering how so many people accidently ride the slide just a little bit after pulling it back and “releasing” it, they may very well have higher slide speeds (or, at least, consistently higher) by using the lock as a release. It may be harder for some people to mess that up.

          ^^^ all that said, for my own training I personally choose to pull back on the slide to release it. It DOES slow down mag changes vs. using the strong hand thumb to release. Whether you think it’s a lot of time or an inconsequential amount of time is also subjective.

        • avatarJ- says:

          I may not be a firearms engineer persay, but I am an engineer who has worked on firearms, as well as a whole host of other things. And no, if you evaluate Hooke’s law and elastic moduli, its a linear function. The extra energy you get from the last 1/8 of an inch of compression compared to the overall travel length of the spring is negligible. If that last 1/8 of an inch was the difference between a feed and a jam, there are a lot of other issues to deal with, like a spring rate that is too low.

          Besides, to put a more common sense angle on it. If the firearms engineers didn’t want you use the slide release as a slide release, they wouldn’t design it to work like a slide release. You want an example. The PPK has no slide release. The mechanism is all internal. You have to sling shot it on a loaded mag (or no mag). You put a button on the side of the gun, in easy reach of the shooter’s thumb, if you expect the shooter to push it.

      • avatarMichael Archibald says:

        Truth on : My way your way unless there be an SOP , Point being comfort/familiarity/function=positive results in CQB= SURVIVAL! … Good stuff ! Thanks.

    • avatarJustice06RR says:

      Using it as a “Slide Release” has never given me any problems with Glocks, M&P’s, and XD’s.

      This issue is very minor in the grand scheme of things when shooting semi-auto pistols.

    • avatarJay Dunn says:

      The owner’s manual for my Kahr CM9 says to ALWAYS use the slide release.

    • avatarRon says:

      Colt 1911, S&W 3913, Kahr K9 Elite, Kahr K40 Elite, Walther P99CQA, HK P2000SK, XD 9811,9802,9301,9402
      Forty- five years, wife twenty-two years, untold thousands of rounds.
      Always use slide stop.
      Never had a problem.

  2. avatarJim R says:

    The trigger is what breaks it for me. That’s a serious safety issue, one that needs to be fixed sooner rather than later.

  3. avatarjwm says:

    I’m not a .45 fan. But the big Ruger (aren’t they all) actually feels good in my hand.

    • I actually own a SR45, and got rid of my M&P .40 because I like the bigger caliber size bullet. I really don’t see any difference between the SR45 and the M&P. I guess it’s just all about perception. Some ppl like what they like, but in the end all the guns will kill, except a highpoint, LOL! Why pay more money for something that’s going to do the exact same job. Doesn’t make any sense to me. It’s like the Army hiring more civilians to do a job that military personnel can do for cheaper; makes no sense, but listen to this clown if you want too!

  4. avatarGuardian says:

    What detrimental effect does using the slide lock as a release have on the firearm? Or is it a safety/other concern? I try not to do this, however, it is something that seems to be pretty common.

    • avatarRKBA says:

      Please see my reply above.

    • avatarDan A says:

      Well, it’s said that over time, repeated use of the slide stop as a release can wear the stop down to the point where the slide won’t lock back anymore. I’ve seen this on a number of rental guns, and the occasional used gun.

      Some guns will not reliably chamber a cartridge when using the slide stop (though most will), and not all guns have an external slide stop and many that do don’t have one in the same spot. So if you have multiple pistols it would make more sense to train without using the slide stop as a release.

      Finally, there’s also the idea that, in a life or death situation, you defer to “gross” motor skills instead of “fine” motor skills, and trying to thumb a slide stop is going to be a lot more difficult than yanking back on the slide. That’s something that people say a lot, though I haven’t seen anything that actually backs it up besides sounding good in theory.

      The argument also comes down to the habit some have of dropping the slide on an empty chamber. Most people who don’t see harm in doing so will use the slide stop to do it. Whether that actually causes damage or not, beats me.

      Hope I answered your question

  5. avatarBilly says:

    Makes me miss my Ruger P90… A b!tch to conceal but it could out shoot my Colt Commander and SigP220.

    • avatarMatt says:

      That was a sweet gun. It’s really hard to complain about my P89dc…but there are days I do wish I had opted to keep the P90 instead of the 9mm.

  6. avatarMike S says:

    External safety is a non-starter for me, but I’m glad to see it nonetheless. One hopes the SR series is an evolutionary step for Ruger.

  7. avatarS.CROCK says:

    I am not a fan of this gun. The only semi auto Rugers I like are the lcp, lc9, and sr 22. Other than those I thinks they are all ugly and cheap looking, and I have heard of to many reliability issues with them.

    • avatarTR says:

      Reliability issues? I had an SR9c for over a year, put well over 1,000 rounds of the cheapest, nastiest stuff I could find through it with nary a hiccup. Light, 17+1 capacity, and more accurate than I am. Putting the safety on was a pain, but thumbing it off during a draw was plenty easy. All in all, anyone who complains about ‘reliability’ issues with the SR series comes across as attempting to justify spending a lot more for a name-brand plastic fantastic that does the exact same thing. Sometimes not as well.

    • avatarWA_2A says:

      Ugly? Cheap looking?

      Have you SEEN the Mark III Hunter?

      • avatarDan H says:

        I didn’t even need to see a Mk III Hunter to know that I wanted one, and bought one online last year. I LOVE that pistol. Still torn on whether to hump a scope on top of it or stick to the irons, OK, plastic and iron. Gorgeous pistol and superb ergonimics!

  8. avatarAM says:

    I’d rather have an M&P 45 for that price.

  9. avatarBrett says:

    Great review RF. Loved the Man v. Food reference…now that is the life.

  10. avatardom says:

    From what I have read and seen, the street price is around $440. Not a bad deal.

  11. avatarAccur81 says:

    Hey, most stock AR triggers have a bunch of creep. It doesn’t stop them from being used in military, civilian, and LE applications. It is, arguably, more of an issue in a handgun. I’m not defending the trigger, just thinking out loud. All my ARs – work guns included – have creepy single stage triggers.

    The SR45 does not seem to be a superior gun, on paper, than the Glock 21 SF. 13 rounds of .45, relatively decent accuracy, and stone cold reliability are a tough combination to beat. It is, however, better looking. Please don’t compare Glocks to Rosie O’Donnel. Glocks are not *that* ugly, and they have a certain utilitarian charm. Not so much for Rosie O.

  12. avatarLance says:

    Looks nice if Ruger improved trigger pull then we it might be interesting. It dose look like another Glock clone but if it has a grip normal people can grip (Glocks way too bulky) then it may get use in LE and Security.

  13. avatarhkfan says:

    Looks cheap to me. Why buy this when the m&p is a proven platform for a similar amount of money.

    • avatarken says:

      Yep, tons of proven platforms already.Ruger making pistols is like Remington making pistols, stick to what you do best. You don’t see Glock trying to take on Beretta in bird guns.

      • avatarWA_2A says:

        +1, I’d like to see some more Ruger revolvers added to the lineup (The only addition this year was one in 480 Ruger)

  14. avatartdiinva says:

    If you want to have only one 45 caliber pistol don’t waste your time with a polymer. Get a 1911. For those of you who don’t like 45 and live in a state with or soon to have restrictions on JHP learn to love the big round because when you are restricted to FMJ you are going to want that 230 grains of mass for personal defense.

  15. avatarJohn Moses says:

    I still prefer to buy a used Sig, Beretta, Glock or H/K than a new Ruger. Just my experience with the brand.

  16. avatarken says:

    Am I the only one thats not impressed with the look of Rugers handguns? 5 stars & “sexy” is a bit much. Give me Sig, FN, Glock, S&w, Beretta, CZ,…but they definitely look better than Hi Points…

    Ruger’s an old man brand, no reason to give them a chance in category already chock full A+ performers. They should stick making rifles. Their .22 takedown is a nice plinker and their scout rifle is pretty nice.

    • avatarMatt in FL says:

      No, you’re not alone. I don’t find the Ruger handguns any more than “meh.” Five stars and “supermodel sexy” is really, really overstating it.

      I’m really not a fan of the billboard model name down the side of the slide. For comparison, I like the looks of both SIGs and XD(M) variants for different but basically equal reasons. SIGs are great looking guns, and XD(M) variants are tough but functional in appearance, and functional is beautiful. I don’t dislike Glocks, I just don’t find that they give me an opinion in either direction.

      • avatarDan H says:

        Used to feel the same way until I tried my co-workers SR9c and the excellent trigger it had. I was plenty accurate it with it too, and outshot the owner and another co-worker testing it out. That alone has me tempted to pick up an SR45, but I absolutely adore my XD 45 and it is truly my favorite pistol, all-around. Still, and it could just be the beer talking, but I am very, very tempted to get one of these having ogled them once again.

    • avatarJohn Moses says:

      Agree, not top shelf pistols. Would take one over a Taurus but not much else. Good .22 pistols and rifles. Centerfires just don’t have it. Feel clumsy.

      • avatarken says:

        Yeah in fairness to ruger I forgot to mention their little LC line of super compacts are pretty good for what they are too.

    • avatarWA_2A says:

      Hey now, Ruger makes some really nice revolvers.

  17. avatarDogman says:

    Nothing special here. I’d pick a G21 over the Ruger anytime. Or a P220 at twice the price.

    Still, it’s worth a closer look if it’s half as reliable as the Ruger P345 I had. That damn thing was a garbage disposal–fed my worst reject handloads and the best premium hollow points with total reliability. Accurate too.

  18. avatarJames says:

    Helena Svedin?

    The pistol is far better looking.

  19. avatarWally1 says:

    I don’t need a handgun that has to be pin-point accurate more than 100 yards, that’s what rifles are for. I do need a handgun that is anvil reliable. It has to go bang, all the time , every time. I think the ruger SR45 will fit the bill. I have never had a Ruger that was not 100 percent reliable. This sucks, just last month I told myself, “OK, no more guns!” Well’ maybe just this and a M1 Garand, then thats it!

  20. avatarDarren says:

    I’m afraid I don’t get the criticism of the Ruger’s trigger. I am a police detective, and sufficiently skilled to shoot 100% on my department’s qualification course almost every year. I’ve been a cop 12 years, and have seen our department go from S&W 6906s, to 5946s, to Glock 17s, and now we’re about to switch to Glock 21s. When we got the Glocks, our range personnel instructed us to feel the trigger reset when we were shooting, but I can tell you that no one at our range, or the other LEO-focused training I’ve attended has EVER taught me to feel when the trigger is about to break. It’s a complete non-issue. Your finger is supposed to stay off the trigger until you decide to shoot. When you decide to shoot, you just press the trigger back in one smooth motion and shoot. You don’t need to feel when the gun is about to shoot, because you have already decided to shoot before even putting your finger on the trigger. If you are in any way uncertain as to whether or not you need to take the shot, your finger should not yet be on the trigger.

    It actually sounds to me like you’ve got it exactly backward. Staging a trigger is something target shooters have done with double action revolvers for decades because it allows them to shoot consistent, tight groups on the range. But combat shooters are taught to execute a smooth, complete trigger stroke in one continuous motion.

    “A reliable, accurate, good-looking gun that doesn’t ‘get’ self-defense?” I think it gets it just fine. If you’re planning on staging your trigger in a self-defense shooting, on the other hand, I think maybe you don’t.

    • avatarDanjojo says:

      Darren, agree 100%. Do not understand where staging the trigger is coming from lately in regards to defensive/service pistols. The pistol is also a good bit slimmer than a Glock 21…unless you compare a small lever on one pistol to the entire slide and frame of the other and consider it the same.

    • avatarJonSEAZ says:

      Darren, you absolutely are 100% from-the-textbook correct with every point you made. Combat and defensive shooting holds no place for trigger staging, most especially with semi-autos.

    • avatarEric SR45 Owner says:

      I agree 100% Darren. I love this Gun. I am just wondering about all these negative comments about this gun,if anyone of you making these comments has even shot this gun? I believe if you had ,you would be singing a different tune. ONE MANS OPINION…

  21. avatarAlan Szymanski says:

    Regarding the Ruger SR45 and the other Ruger SR Models. I think they are one of the better looking and more attractive pistols on the market today. They also have a grip shape that is very ergonomic and fits my hand like a glove. I has a SR40C (Compact) model and loved it for CCW carry in an outside the belt holster. It was very reliable and pretty accurate. About other guns mentioned: Sigarms pistols are accurate, but fairly old school and heavy in weight. The ergonomics is not that great and they are way over-priced. But I still like them. I bought a Springfield Armory XDm 4.5 in .45acp. The Ergonomics were great and after shooting it I really loved it. It was the most accurate pistol I ever shot. One hole bulls-eye performance. I tried the Compact model but found the grip of the pistol feeling thicker and not as comfortable as the 4.5 size pistol. I have owned several 1911 style pistols over the years. Some of the Best have been a stainless 3-1/2″ barrelled Titan model in 45acp, and a full-size and Commander sized Smith&Wesson 1911′s in Stainless, and also a Para-Ordnance Commander sized pistol in Stainless with High Capacity and with their Double-Action type Hammer/Trigger. I have also owned one of the first SR1911′s from Ruger – However I was vastly dissappointed with the accuracy. As for which gun I miss the most – that is the Smith & Wesson Model 4506-1 in .45acp. The first edition that was a stainless / silver colored – with the silver anodized Trigger, Hammer, and safety levers. And with the rounded trigger guard. I owned many and unfortunately sold them. I always thought they would be available. Also – I think a lot of people who commented on this article got way off track in discussing the Safety Lever and about releasing the slide. The proper use of this section would be to comment on the pistol in the article – the Ruger SR45 pistol.

    • avatarAaron David says:

      A-men brother, I bought my SR45 about 6 weeks ago and my buddy bought a SR1911 the same day. Mine cost $489, I bought the first one I found, his was $799. But the first range session 300 rounds in my SR45 slide stop quit working (not the guns fault), I switched mags and 20 rounds later, same thing. So I called Ruger and told them their mags sucked, 4 days later I got 2 mew mags. No problems since, So far Ive shot about 1000 and he has shot about 700 rounds of lead cast bullets through our Rugers flawlessly. In this ammo drought we just keep a shootin cause we were prepared. Its hard to not like a 1911 (in fact I love it and he loves my SR45) but as gunnies we respect each others prefrences. I wouldnt trade. Just for kicks the other day I set up a human souloette target 100 yds and fired 10 rounds standing and put 9 on target (not aiming high) not bad for 5 cents a round! Triggers are triggers for arguments, what I like the next guy wont, so I respect opinions on triggers but the SR45 is fine for runnin and gunnin or targeting for me. The STANDARD will always be the Glock in striker fire, but I am a youth shooting instructer so I will never own a w/o safety gun period. Also Lead cast is a NO NO unless you order a standard twist barrel and never use the original in Glocks.

  22. avatarDennis Carr says:

    I don’t go with this guy.. With the pull distance and reset, in a gun battle your are going to be looking at your finger?

    10 or 13.. What? Your going to the OK corral? I would rather hit the target than spray bullets all over the landscape, besides that is why we have police and gang bangers..

    The SR45 was $419.00 with the crooked (I am in Illinois, the outlet for crooked Politics) governor getting $29.33.. $448.33 out the door on Saturday..

    • avatarTony R says:

      Gents, I bought a SR45 despite the comments on the original write-up. The exaggerated descriptors are misleading, no disrespect intended. I should tell you that I have the best grouping I have ever had with any .45 I have ever shot (4″ @ 15′, on target) mainly Glock, H&K, Taurus, FN. I attribute this to the gun fitting my hand and shooting style. My accuracy and grouping also remained consistent with my double tap drills. And, while I have large hands, I don’t have hands like a 7 foot Norseman. While the Glock was close in fit, I had issues correcting for my 7 o’clock grouping @ 4-5 inches off target. also, my double tap accuracy was not consistent. I attribute this, again, to the gun fitting my hand better than other .45′s. I do to ind the weight of the weapon an issue, nor do I care for the discussion n the trigger squeeze. One should never second guess a trigger squeeze, that is a dangerous “habit”.
      The lesson for the readers is to dismiss the minutia, focus on the facts, and always try the gun before buying it. Also, as another brother said earlier. Focus on comments that concentrate on the weapon in its entirety.
      Bottom line, the SR45 will be my new weapon of choice due to my improved accuracy and grouping with a .45. My previous primary weapon was my 9mm XDM.
      Without starting another off base debate, I prefer the .45 caliber for its stopping power- and discussions with law enforcement family. And, as someone said earlier, I don’t need the 19 rounds my XDM offers. 10 rounds of a .45 is what I prefer for civilian use.

    • avatarJohn says:

      Where in Illinois did you get it for $419?

  23. avatarMike C says:

    DO NOT, I repeat, DO NOT take the advice of someone who talks about putting his finger on the trigger before making a decision as to whether to shoot or not in a deadly force encounter. The person who wrote this article has NO idea what he is talking about with regards to this pistol’s suitability for “self defense work.” Armed encounters are usually quick, deadly and close. You do NOT put your finger on the trigger until you are determined to destroy whatever is in the bullet’s path, and you sure as HELL do not decide whether or not to shoot while pulling the trigger and feeling for a breaking point.

    The author also apparently doesn’t know how to measure the width of a firearm. The SR45 is in no way as wide as a G21. The width measurement given on the Ruger website is from safety lever to safety lever, a useless and misleading measurement in my opinion. Anyone with fully developed senses of touch and sight can tell that the overall width of the slide and frame are much slimmer than a G21, or a host of other pistols.

    This is not a matter of opinion. These are facts.

    • avatardave says:

      Minus the bluster and I generally agree. I feel like the writer was mainly trying to communicate the feel of the trigger. Good point out from the basic gun rules tho- it probably needed saying.

  24. avatarM1 Al says:

    Went and held this this one on monday. Have to say it makes my glocks feel like blocks. I love 1911s, and I love my Glocks… thats why the SR45 is my next weapon.

  25. avatarBrian Lamica says:

    You know what I am sick of is all these reviews that I have read about how this gun is such a great weapon. (which is why I purchased it in the first place) I have had nothing but problems with mine from the start, bad clips,the slide won’t lock back if you can get it to fire a full clip of ammo and light primer strikes on 2 boxes of high end ammo and 1 box of the Russian stuff all FMJ. At first I thought that I just got a lemon but after doing some research I am finding that alot of people have had problems with this gun. I was talking about it at work and found out that another guy at work also has had problems with his gun, Ruger has replaced the clips, and said they repaired the problem with the light primer strikes but when I went out to shoot it I did not even get through a clip and it still won’t fire right. I have never had such problems with any of my other guns. glocks, s&w,interarms cat9, kimber, fnh, SR1911, or any other hand guns I have. I think it’s time to get rid of it because even if I send it back in I will never trust it to function relieably again especialy when its my life and familys life on the line. And I am all done trusting gun reviews because I think that the reviewers get guns that are not what the general public buy at the local gun shop. This is the 2nd time I have trusted reviews from several magazines and online and was burnt. Oh by the way I was a big Ruger fan and have several guns from them but I think that their quality has slipped a bit in recent years with such a mad dash to get guns out as fast as they can. So if oy guys are going to do reviews go to the local gun stores and get your guns and give us the good,the bad ,and the ugly please.

  26. avatarDano says:

    I read the reviews on this gun and then we had a local gun show where a vendor actually had one for about 400 even. I was smitten. After only 100 rounds it’s a keeper for me. I shot it alongside my XD and I was surprised that I was shooting better with the SR than the XD. Looking forward to putting a lot more rounds through this pistol.

  27. avatarSylvan says:

    Shame the media does not show the truth behind “control”

    It is the democratic party that was constantly on the forefront to stops blacks from obtaining a firearm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nckgyfGbdnU

  28. avatarSilverdude Dude says:

    Ok if ruger spent a ton of money to devolp the sr45. Logic would apply that useing the slide release at any time during use may be necessary. I am confident the development of the gun , concidered this as a function critical in design. I trust ruger that the spring will have enough energy to rack a round.

  29. avatardave says:

    I usually shot revolvers and guns from the world wars- which gives me an antiquated benchmark I know, but I enjoy them. I got the sr45 because I wanted to stop pilfering my brothers 1911 and I wanted something I could carry in the woods that didn’t need to be un-chambered or carried locked like the 1911. I love the sr45, it was odd for me at first, but when I got the hang of it, I loved it. I havnt had any failure to fire problems after the first day, but I hear that alot of people have. Ruger is one of my favorite manufactures, so I really hope that enough people keep sending any problem guns back so that they can work out the outlying issues. I dumped taurus/rossi because they won’t work toward proper quality control as fit for firearms and the safeties are poorly integrated (I own two, and literally destroyed one after 8 months of customer dis-service and one instance of splayed lead all over the shooter’s arm) I will do the same with my Ruger if I have to, but it would upset me.

  30. avatarBrad says:

    I recently bought a Ruger SR 45 and have had great experience with it. So far 100 rounds of 230 gr. FMJ WWB with only a light primer strike on round 73; i merely reset the striker and it went bag the next time. My accuracy was excellent with 3″ groups at 15 or 20 yards. The front sight is actually mounted off center on mine but the rear is adjustable. I have medium hands with long fingers, I actually love the feel of a CZ 97. The ruger is almost too slim for me, but still fills my hand.

    I did clean the thing really well before shooting including the strikeer channel and assembly. If you do not do this, then you will have issues.

    The trigger is great for me. I prefer single action and leave me finger off the trigger until go time. Once I place my finger on trigger, a flame will be coming out the end.

    As for the safety, I use it to carry condition one and can brush it off with reflex. It is hard to reapply without use of off hand, but so what.

    Just one man’s thoughts. For me it was $ well spent.

  31. avatarHarry says:

    Fired the sr45 recently & liked it a lot. Surprised at how fast & accurately I was able to shoot it. The trigger was excellent & the grip felt very good in my small hands. Recoil seems soft for a .45. Unlike some who dislike the LCI, I find them very useful in a competition gun. The 3 dot sight is excellent too. The 10 round mag. is adequate. The only negative I found was the stiff slide, may not be good for people with hand strength problems. I’ll probably add one to my collection.

  32. avatarMilt says:

    There are a lot of positive comments in this blog by SR-45 owners. I just bought one after reading Jeff Quinn’s write-up on the SR-45. Jeff said it was the most accurate .45 he’s ever shot and he’s shot and written about most of them. Others in this blog say the same thing regarding accuracy from their SR. As we all know, you don’t get accuracy from a sloppy trigger pull so something there is working properly. I haven’t shot mine yet but looking forward to it.

  33. avatarruss r says:

    had my SR45 for a year now, just shy of 2500 rounds no issues. installed Trijicon night sights fall of last year, love em’. carry it it a Safariland multi-fit paddle holster, and retention is excellent and fit is perfect. aimed fire groups at 20 yards are sub-three inch and rapid fire at 10 yards is 4″. i’m tickled.

Leave a Reply

Please use your real name instead of you company name or keyword spam.