Gear Review: Bushnell HDMR 3.5-21x50mm w/ G2-DMR FFP Reticle

Long range scopes don’t really come in “one size fits all” configurations. You need to get your hands on the scope, try it out, and see what works best for your own particular shooting style. Bushnell isn’t making that process easier, what with their rather daunting combination of tube size, magnification range and reticle choice, so when I picked one to test for a review, I wasn’t exactly sure of what I was getting. But from the second I took it out of the box, I knew I had something downright nifty on my hands . . .

First things first: this thing is MASSIVE.

I thought the 30mm tube scope I usually have on my rifle was large, but Bushnell’s scope uses a rather amazingly rotund 34mm tube. In fact, it’s so large that none of the local stores had rings to fit it. Luckily, Warne makes a set of scope rings that are just about perfect for this optic and only cost about $100. But more on those later.

The massiveness doesn’t stop with the main tube. Everything on this scope has been super sized, from the magnification adjustment knob to the adjustment turrets. Having just adjusted my Trijicon Accupoint earlier that day with a 1 inch tube and rather small adjustment dials, it felt like I was using a Fisher Price “My First Scope” by comparison. Not that it felt at all cheap — everything was just over-sized so you could get a better grip.

One feature I really liked about the adjustment knobs is the way they lock. In order to move the dials, you first need to pull them up so that they can rotate — pushing them back down locks them into place again. This keeps them from being knocked around and losing zero, which brings some added peace of mind when you’re in the field.

The reason for the larger tube becomes apparent as soon as you look through the scope. And that view is rather amazing. The larger tube means larger lenses and more light traveling through the scope. All that adds to optical clarity and allows for better low light performance. Bigger is definitely better when you’re looking for quality glass.

But it was the reticle on this thing I was talking about when I said it was downright nifty. This is the G2-DMR reticle, a first focal plane etching that’s the compromise between the standard mil-dot reticle (which is simply a large dot every 1 Mil along the crosshairs) and a horus reticle (which has markings for windage and elevation 1 Mil in every direction under the aiming point).

It allows for both range estimation and the use of “pure holds,” where the shooter simply uses the markings on the reticle instead of dialing the windage and elevation knobs for every new distance, without cluttering up the scope too much. Pictured above are steel plates at 500 yards.

The major selling point (besides the actual lines) is the fact that this is a first focal plane scope, which means that the distance between the dots on the reticle are exactly 1 mil no matter what magnification you’re set at. It’s great for doing range estimation on the fly, but it adds significantly to the cost of construction.

All that scope does have one big drawback, though: it’s like tying a lead brick to your rifle. The optic weighs almost twice as much as the Primary Arms scope I’m rather fond of using on this rifle, which makes it a real pain in the ass if you’re doing anything besides shooting from a stationary position. I couldn’t imagine trying to lug this boat anchor through the woods on a hunting trip, unless I had a mule to schlep the whole set-up.

Here’s the real kicker though: Vortex does an similar scope with a slightly less complex reticle (and slightly higher base magnification) for damn near half the price. One that’s smaller, lighter and illuminated to boot. It also takes standard 30mm rings instead of the super fancy 34mm ones the Bushness requires.

But the real improvement this scope offers is that reticle. The G2-DMR reticle in the first focal plane is really nice if you’re looking for a compromise between a horus and mil dot. But if you’re not sold on the reticle and want something lighter and half the price, I’d look into the Vortex instead.

Specifications: Bushnell HDMR 3.5-21x50mm w/ G2-DMR Reticle

Weight: 32.5 oz
Adjustments: 1/10 mil
Eye Relief:

Ratings (out of five):
(Final rating IS NOT calculated from the constituent ratings, and is based on how well the scope compares to other similar products)

Optical Clarity * * * * *
The large scope tube allows a ton of light to pass through the glass, which makes the images appear quite clear. My camera doesn’t do it justice.

Feel & Function * * * * *
While everything on the scope is massive, it all feels really well put together. There’s no wobble in the turrets, and the magnification adjustment knob feels downright solid.

Overall Quality * * * * *
Its a great, quality scope.

Overall Rating * * *
If you absolutely must have a horus or G2 reticle in the first focal plane, one with a low base magnification, then this is a pretty snazzy scope. But its size, weight and price make it somewhat less attractive compared to other comparable offerings.


  1. avatar Roll says:

    OW, was very nice until I looked at the MSRP….Think I will go to vortex…

    1. avatar pest says:

      Street price is 1400.

    2. avatar pest says:

      Street price is only 1400.

  2. avatar mikeinid says:

    If your shooting skills are advanced to the point you can use an H-58 or similar Horus type reticle, this might be an option. I would think this is made to compete with a higher end scope than the straight mil dot vortex.
    I have a lot to learn, and thus purchased a mid-range mil-dot vortex. If my shooting skills progress to pure holds and successful wind calls, I would like to move up to the next level of scope, which this looks to be.

  3. avatar Accur81 says:

    The Vortex Viper is similar, but definitely not the same. It has a 4-16 x or 6-24 x magnification. A 3.5 – 21 x magnification range on the Bushnell is truly exceptional. That magnification range is possible due to the 34 diameter of the body tube, which necessitates a heavy weight. On a dedicated long range rifle, weight doesn’t matter as much. I am currently not aware of another scope other than Bushnell Elite series which offers that level of magnification range.

    For my “money,” I would much prefer the Leupold Mark 6 3-18x 44mm scope on a hunting or tactical platform. Looks like a winner to me, and I hope y’all get a chance to review it soon.

  4. avatar Joe Grine says:

    A 6 x 24 is not “virtually identical” to a 3.5 x 21. Nothing against the Vortex, but its fully 2 & 1/4 inches longer than the Bushnell, and only has a rather pedestrian 4x optical range. Scopes that have 5x and 6x optical range are always going to cost more than old-technology scopes with 4x optical range. Furthermore, making the scope more compact requires much more sophisticaled glass. Not to mention that the 6x low magnification on the Vortex is highly problematic when shooting anything moving at close range. Those two scopes are not even in the same league.

  5. avatar pest says:

    Nick, another big reason for the tube size is it greatly increases the vertical adjustment range, which means you can dial out much more distance. You should look at vertical adjustment ranges for this and the vortex you offer as an alternative. Another great thing about the HDMR is the great 4″ eye relief. Also, you should move that front ring back against the turret structure so its not possible for the scope to creep forward under recoil.

  6. Necroposting, I know, but your review just sold me on this scope, which had been recommended to me. The eye relief sounds wonderful.

  7. avatar Steve Clark says:

    After I bought the XRS I sold all my Vortex glass.
    I think Nick is full of BS thinking Vortex glass comes any where near this scope.
    Review the scope and don’t be recommending a lesser product.
    Just take a look at what the PRS shooters are using.

    If ya can’t afford the glass then don’t review it.

  8. avatar Sean La says:

    I bought this scope for my LR 308 AR10 Build. It is really quite amazing. When dialed back to 3.5 everything within 25 meters is crystal clear and when dialed out to 21 the Recital is amazing. If you are looking for a very adaptive scope for both hunting and Long Range precision shooting, take a serious look at this scope. I got mine for $1200 off amazon (not sure I can say that on this website). Using their card give you 12 month same as cash to pay for it. My Dad has a Nightforce Second Focal and I would take this FF over that everyday.
    Hope this helps if you are on the fence.

  9. avatar BigDave says:

    @pest: Nick has the scope mounted perfectly. Rings should always be as far apart as possible. They should take up as much rail real estate as possible on a bolt gun. Nick has done this. If your scope moves in any set of rings there is a severe problem,,ie cheap rings, failure to lap the rings, failure to torque the screws properly, failure to use Loctite.
    FYI: properly mounted, a scope will never move in a set of Warne rings!

  10. purchased a bushnell et6245fg ers6-24×50 g2 retical rifle scope for my
    savage 11/111 long range rifle at amazon for less than $900.00 it is by far the best scope in ffp that one could ever want for all around shooting far and get what you pay for!

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email