This is What Happens to a Disarmed Populace: WH Smith Bans Shooting Sports Mags for UK Kids Edition

Back in August, we reported on UK Animal Aid’s campaign to make Shooting Times and The Field magazines “age restricted” material. They argued that images of dead animals (and text about shooting same) are “damaging not just to wildlife but also to the emotional development of young people.” telegraph.co.uk reports that Britain largest chain of newsagents has caved to the crusade; WH Smith no longer sells the mags to children under 14. “The retailer, whose founding family owned a highly prized shoot in Buckinghamshire, says it has introduced an age limit on such magazines as Shooting Times because children are not allowed to obtain a firearms certificate until they are 14.” Really? Actually no . . .

Sports enthusiasts point out that this is wrong. There is no minimum age for holding a shotgun licence in Britain, although children below 18 cannot buy or own a gun themselves and under-14s must be supervised by an adult.

They question why the high street chain does not restrict the sale of motoring magazines such as TopGear to those old enough to drive.

“It is extraordinary that in WH Smith you can buy a car magazine at any age, despite the age limit of 17 for driving,” said Christopher Graffius, of the British Association for Shooting and Conservation.

“You can also buy numerous war magazines which depict the killing of people, yet WH Smith is concerned about children buying shooting magazines, a legal and an Olympic sport.

Note: this is not a government ban. As a private business, WH Smith is free to sell anyone of any age any magazine they want including pornography. Or not. But the newsagents’ move reflects the increasing marginalization of all gun rights, now that the UK has banned firearms for personal defense.

Here’s the official reaction from Alastair Balmain, editor of Shooting Times. Note the use of the word “thousands”:

“The idea that shooters, no matter what their age, are being subject to an embarrassing “restricted item” check by staff when they head for the tills is shocking, especially so when you consider that the content of magazines such as ours is specifically geared towards a family audience. I started shotgun shooting when I was 10, air rifles when I was younger. Like so many others, I enjoyed the support of my parents when I was starting to shoot. Thousands like me are outraged by the implication that our sport is worthy of such an arbitrary and ludicrous restriction.”

The jihad against the UK shooting sports, including a forthcoming ban on lead shot, is food for thought for anyone who’d argue that American hunters’ rights would remain untouched should other types of gun control find [more] fertile ground in The Land of the Free.

comments

  1. avatar shawmutt says:

    Oh no! Pictures of dead animals and text about killing them?!? Think of the children!

    …while they’re sitting down to a nice pork/chicken/steak/fish meal with the pretty packaged meat they bought from the store. I’m genuinely surprised that “animal rights” groups actually have enough clout there to enact something like that. Ugh, enough internet browsing, it’s small game season here!

    1. avatar Mike says:

      That’s the next step, no one 14 and under can buy meat or fish at the supermarket and all meat products will be cover with a “Not appropriate for 14 and under” banner.

  2. avatar lkj says:

    The US is no better. All the guns in the world can’t make up for lies and bullshit.

    1. avatar henry bowman says:

      you are right it cant make up for it…but it can remove the scum with spouts these lies…..

  3. avatar DerryM says:

    Ok, I guess the Brits are looking for a “Most Ludicrous Society” award in The Guinness Book of World Records.

  4. avatar A Brit in MI says:

    Yuk, outrageous policy. The problem is the liberal mindset of the political leaders, the influence of whom has grown since they first started getting into power and pervading the minds of a certain percentage of the population. Of course that certain percentage are the vociferous ones, as well as the ones in positions of responsibility (teachers, politicians, media etc etc). I got my shotgun certificate at the age of 16 in the UK and enjoyed reading magazines (Field & Stream included) well before then.

    My worry is that the same thing could happen here. Thankfully there are organizations dedicated to trying to prevent this from happening!

  5. avatar AlphaGeek says:

    Hopefully this will stimulate interest in the magazine by the under-14 crowd. It would definitely have that effect on the kids I know.

  6. avatar Ken says:

    I can see it now. Under 14’s will be hiding under the covers at night with their flashlights looking at the dirty pictures of guns, hunting, etc.

    1. avatar إبليس says:

      Meet Holland and Holland, two sexy twins gone wild!

  7. avatar GS650G says:

    Meanwhile Page 3 shows wholesome family content.

    1. avatar JuanCudz says:

      I wish I went into town more often, I’d get to move them all around. Not into the ‘comics’ section tho’. (edit:Blast! Pesky reply button again!)

  8. avatar Reece Fowler says:

    There is a petition to get WHSmith to overturn their ridiculous and simply unjustifiable policy:

    http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/whsmiths-retract-policy-on-sale-of-shooting-magazines

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email