Australian Olympic Committee’s Hypocritical Hopolophobia Revealed

When a brace of Australian Olympic swimmers posted a posing pic featuring firearms their Olympic Committee had a hissy fit. The AOC banned Nick D’Arcy and Kenrick Monk from social media and all post-Olympic festivities. And now it can be revealed [via slfarmonline.com]: “The national federation organised a so-called team bonding session at a Canberra rifle range in 2007 . . . Five years ago, on a camp that [Australian Olympic swimmer Eamon] Sullivan attended, Olympic gold medallist Libby Trickett was snapped firing a vintage pistol with her teammates watching on [above], apparently in an exercise to build team harmony.”

Share
avatar

About Robert Farago

Robert Farago is the Publisher of The Truth About Guns (TTAG). He started the site to explore the ethics, morality, business, politics, culture, technology, practice, strategy, dangers and fun of guns.
This entry was posted in Gun Control, Gun Nation. Bookmark the permalink.

28 Responses to Australian Olympic Committee’s Hypocritical Hopolophobia Revealed

  1. avatar commentmaster says:

    Wow, what an awful picture.

  2. avatar ST says:

    Girl holding gun=social empowerment.

    Men holding guns=a terrorist crime against the state.

  3. avatar Derek says:

    Holy Cow, look at those guns. Cool pistol too.

  4. avatar Mike S says:

    Girl firing boomstick -eyepro = girl doing dumb thing

  5. avatar Ralph says:

    They went to a rifle range? OMG, I think I’m going to faint.

  6. avatar DaveM says:

    Make them swim back to Australia as punishment for such an evil deed.

  7. avatar Cameron S. says:

    Shooting old gun = okay
    Holding unloaded new gun = evil

    I’m confused.

    • avatar Joel says:

      “see, when the US constitution was penned, they thought that Muzzleloaders would be the most advanced guns would ever get, which is why only they should be accessible to the hands of the civilian.” -Any Anti-Gun Politician

      • avatar IdahoPete says:

        And this “advanced guns not coveered by the 2nd Amendment” approach does not apply to 1st Amendment “freedom of the press” and radio, TV, or the internet. The writers of the Constitution KNEW those would be developed, even back in 1776.

  8. avatar LongPurple says:

    “at a Canberra rifle range in 2007 . . . Five years ago”

    But, but, but. . . that was then. This is now!

  9. avatar Jason says:

    Sans eye protection too. Not only afraid of guns but ignorant to boot.

  10. avatar Johnny says:

    Can’t have your role model swimmers handle firearms. The children might get interested and vote us out of power!

  11. avatar Bob says:

    Australian Gun Control. Another great country destroyed by progressivism.

    There was a time I thought of moving there, because I relished a life of greater freedom. Not anymore.

  12. avatar Danny McBee says:

    Can we have a photo caption contest for this? That girl’s “horse face” is just too rad to ignore.

  13. avatar flboots says:

    shes firing a flintlock. what a bunch wamby pambys down there. The AOC is a bunch of girlymen.

  14. Pingback: Incendiary Image of the Day: The Hotness Down Under Edition | The Truth About GunsThe Truth About Guns

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>