Gun Review: CZ 75 P-01. Take Two.

It’s summertime and the shooting is CZ. When it comes to this beauteous ballistic Czech mate, you’re in one of two camps. Either you own a CZ and love it or you haven’t shot it yet. I’m in the former camp; I own a CZ 75 P-01. Despite the obvious fanboy joke, my love isn’t blind. Where it counts there’s awesomeness. Elsewhere . . . let’s just say I’ve had to learn the art of compromise. But I’m getting ahead of myself. Pull up a cubicle and listen as I tell you a tale of beauty juxtaposed with horror . . .

The first thing you’ll notice when [sic] you purchase a CZ handgun: the packaging. Happy birthday! The cardboard box wrapped around the black plastic hard case would be better suited to protecting a child’s cake than a handgun. The actual case is lined with generic egg-carton foam with enough room for the gun and two 14-round magazines.

You also get a bore brush (a nice touch), a combination Phillips-head screwdriver/punch (sounds delicious) for the grip screws, a takedown pin (more on that later) and an Allen wrench for adjusting and removing the sights. All useful stuff. There’s also a gun in there, too.

It’s a real looker. The CZ-75′s design is not for everyone, such as blind people, minimalists and anyone who thinks Scarlett Johansson is hard to look at. Like the architect’s daughter, the P-01 has a lot of . . . well . . . shapes. It’s voluptuous. The [gun's] grip has a nice rounded contour which complements the arch above the trigger guard and stands in unique contrast to the business-like straight lines of the slide and light rail.

The back and front straps are serrated vertically to improve grip. A big part of this sexiness is the black polycoat that it wears like a fur coat. The finish is even and smooth and looks thick. It’s also very durable, as evidenced by the stray punch mark I didn’t leave on it.

If you really look closely at this particular CZ 75, you can’t help but notice that there are pins and springs and serrations everywhere. It’s really pretty cluttered on the outside, but somehow it works aesthetically in a “How did something so beautiful arise from the Cold War culture dungeon?” kind of way.

The P-01 is a refinement of the CZ 75D Compact. Česká zbrojovka Uherský Brod improved the metallurgy, added a rail and, through some rigorous but controversial testing, netted a NATO stocking number. Like the other members of the 75 family, the P-01 is double-action and single-action. Unlike some of its siblings, this one employs a frame-mounted de-cocker with no manual safety.

SIG lovers will no doubt be familiar with this system. They’re equally sure to be disappointed by the P-01′s trigger out of the box. SIG’s DA/SA system is the one to beat; the CZ just doesn’t feel nearly as refined. As it leaves the factory, the DA trigger is long, heavy and creepy with just a touch of grit. The decocker itself is positive and responsive, but far from smooth. And while the SA trigger is fairly light with a crisp break, it’s got creep like a Zerg colony.

After a lot of use and/or some careful polishing, the CZ 75′s go pedal will get there. Eventually. Maybe. Meanwhile, I really like shooting this gun. The trigger has smoothed and lightened quite a bit after an accumulated 1000 or so pulls (mixed DA and SA) between snap caps and live rounds. It has a strong and loud reset which, when utilized, eliminates a lot of the take-up on SA follow-up shots.

This is a gun that’s best shot in strings, riding the reset point and squeezing again just before you hit the firing pin block. Even the full double-action pull from the hammer’s half cock position, while long and stagey, breaks predictably and consistently. It’s not perfect, but I like it and it’s only gonna get better.

Oh, and did I mention this thing is a tack driver? Right out of the box—well, after stripping and oiling—the P-01 with its 3.8″ barrel delivered my best group ever at 7 yards: about an inch and a half. I was surprised to see that kind of result, as that 14 round mag was a combination of DA and SA shots from a self-taught shooter with below average eyesight and ugly form, but steady hands. Chalk it up to excellent ergonomics which give the P-01 a very natural point-of-aim.

Definitely don’t chalk it up to the sights. They’re harder to see than an entire episode of Top Shot. Oh, it’s a three-dot alright, but the dots couldn’t be much smaller and they’re painted with green photo-luminescent paint that’s difficult to see in all conditions. It looks like Jackson Pollock painted my front sight in a fit of alcoholic rage.

I suppose this is a way for CZ to distinguish themselves from the pack, but I’d prefer real night sights with a generous white dots. In any case, I didn’t really need them; I found myself shooting very accurately without relying much on sight picture.

That brings me back ’round to the ergonomics thing. The CZ’s low-bore axis and checkered rubber grips, complete with a generous, confidence-inspiring palm-swell, make follow-up shots easy and fun. Rubber grips are great for the range. Buyers with a more defensive mindset may want handles that won’t snag on your cover garment. Don’t worry, there are plenty of options out there.

I picked up some VZ black G-10 grips, but I was torn between wood and the awesome looking Crimson Trace Lasergrips. If you go shopping for gifts for your P-01, keep the palm-swell in mind. Many aftermarket grips remove them to keep things nice and thin. A generous beaver-tail out back makes for a natural point to really choke up on the grip, getting you pretty close to the short and narrow slide without fear of slide bite.

Oh, and that slide? It locks up to the frame tighter than any pistol I’ve ever owned. There is zero perceptible play or rattle anywhere when in battery. The tolerances are tight, yes, but this is due mostly to the internal rails design common to CZs and the SIG P210. You feel like you’re holding a solid piece of metal rather than a bunch of parts thrown together. It’s like getting a custom, hand-fitted handgun out of the factory.

Except it isn’t like that at all. Breaking down the P-01 requires lining up two lines on the slide and frame, then tapping the slide stop out from the other side. It’s not that hard to do (especially with the included punch), but there are better systems out there, of course. Once the two halves are separated, take a look inside and see this:

Pretty bad, right? This is how you make a perfectly reliable, exceptionally accurate, magnificently ergonomic handgun and sell it for between five and six hundred dollars. The finish on the underside of the slide is inconsistent and it’s clear that no attempt was made to deburr anything or smooth out any tooling marks.

Did I say tooling marks? It looks like they used a Dremel to mill this thing. The good news is that none of this seems to affect performance or reliability in any way. Finishing bearing surfaces is kind of stupid anyway, as once it wears you’re left with a looser fit than before. I would definitely like to see fewer sharp edges inside however, as they make cleaning much more difficult and dangerous. The same holds true for the frame. As an aluminum alloy part, there’s no chance of corrosion, but CZ didn’t even bother to finish the guts. It looks like a fifth grader got a hold of mine.

Surprisingly, these problems rarely get mentioned outside of forums and never in reviews. I suppose most people love their CZs so much that they forget about the deficiencies–and that is love–but almost everyone mentions the roughness of the trigger. The truth: they’re the same problem. CZ’s milling process is, um, rough. All of the parts involved in each trigger pull are machined with the same amount of care as the razorblade slide, and what you feel is their grinding hatred for each other as they’re forced into proximity. That said, against all odds, the feeding ramp is beautifully polished.

Many people have extensive work done to their CZs internally to clean them up; others just shoot them a lot until they get there. It’s hard to say which method is utimately more expensive, but the end result is about the same: a near-as-damnit perfect handgun. It may not be presentation-grade, but in function there is no equal. If you don’t mind a little roughness around the edges (maybe you, like me, enjoy the work) and can look past the P-01′s flaws, then you will find a truly world-class shooter; and you are a romantic.

SPECIFICATIONS:

Caliber:                         9mm (also available in .40)
Capacity:                      14+1
Barrel:                           3.8”
Grips:                             Soft Textured Rubber
Sights:                            3-Dot with photo-luminescent paint
Overall length:           7.2”
Height:                           5.03”
Width:                            1.38”
Trigger pull weight: (without a gauge) 5.5 lbs. SA, 12 lbs. DA
Weight:                          1.75 lbs.
Price:                              about $550 retail (prices seem to vary a bit with availability)

RATINGS (out of five stars):

Accuracy: * * * * ½ 
It’s as accurate technically as any pistol I’ve ever shot. Excellent ergonomics give it an edge over the competition.

Ergonomics (firing): * * * * *
As good as they come. Clearly designed around the geometry of the human hand without any concessions to robots.

Ergonomics (carry): * * * *
While its light enough for just about anybody and the organic shape breaks up the print, the rubber grips and magazine floorplates have got to go. They stick to clothes like price tags. As with any compact of this size, the right holster and belt make it disappear.

Reliability: * * * * *
Perfect. This gun shows its hard-working Eastern European roots and gets it done, no matter what it eats.

Customize This: * * * * *
The P-01 has a lot of brothers that accept similar gear, and the P-01 is a popular handgun worldwide despite its rather lukewarm reception stateside. There are enough options to keep you obsessed for a while. Swapping out a mainspring for a slightly lighter one, for example, eases the DA pull down a few non-negligent pounds.

Overall Rating: * * * * *
Concerns with invisible cosmetic problems and craftsmanship quickly become distant memories when a handgun fills your hand so perfectly that you just don’t want to put it down. Give it some time and a little elbow grease and you’ll have a near perfect self-defense weapon, as well as a thrilling range toy. If there weren’t some problems with this thing, I doubt I would be interested enough to write a review, much less love it as much as I do. All in all, it’s a keeper and a tremendous value.

 

 

65 Responses to Gun Review: CZ 75 P-01. Take Two.

  1. avatarChris says:

    Good review.

    I love the Starcraft reference.

  2. avatarbo says:

    I have owned several CZ’s and they all have the rough markings.

    Guess what? It doesn’t affect reliability or shootability one bit.

    I’ve seen folks on the internet disparage CZs due to the internal finish – or lack thereof – but these things are tools! I don’t care how they finish the internals as long as it is reliable and shoots well. SIG finishes out their internals but you can have two CZs for what one all-metal SIG will cost you.

    • avatarCaligula says:

      I own a CZ 75 B and have done nothing to it with the exceptions of adding the aesthetically pleasing cocobolo CZ logo grips. It’s my favorite pistol to shoot other than my Beretta 92A1. Sure, it’s a little rough on the inside, but Eastern Block nations and the Soviet Union were notorious for manufacturing weapons that functioned just fine, but obviously skipped the fluff and buff finishing step. Take a look at Soviet Tanks from WW II onward; the turrets look like they’ve got meteor impact craters on them before they got close to the battle field. My Father in-law is a retired Air Force Colonel pilot, and worked in intelligence during the Cold War. He’s told me that as good as their MiG’s were from a performance standpoint, they were considered to be very Spartan. Pilot comfort, safety, and fit & finish took a back seat to cost considerations and battlefield performance. The Soviets simply didn’t seem to care about aesthetics. But then, why did they need to? It’s not as if they had to compete with another arms supplier. It’s not as if anyone complained about tooling marks on anything for that matter. In a Communist system, bare-bones generic is the benchmark, and all that mattered was the weapon going bang when the trigger was pulled.

  3. avatarRob says:

    Can’t wait to get one.

    I too second the Starcraft reference. Great review.

  4. avatarJD says:

    I loved my CZ 85. I bought mine used and trigger was already worn in quite nicely. I ended up trading if for a Glock 27. I eventually settled on Glock 19C, but if I came across another CZ at a good price I wouldn’t hesitate to buy it. If you want a CZ that glimmers on the inside, see if you can find a Sphinx. I ran across a couple, the cheap ones were $1400 and the last one i saw was $2000. They were absolutely beautiful, probably too beautiful to carry.

    In my opinion, a gun is beautiful if it goes bang every time, and hits what you aim at it. CZs are beautiful.

    Also, any 380 lovers should check out the CZ 83 its probably my favorite gun to shoot, dead accurate, light recoil, perfect ergonomics for people with smaller hands.

  5. avatarDon says:

    Excellent review! Enjoyable read.

    -D

  6. avatarJason says:

    Don’t wait. Get a competition hammer from CZ Custom. (Or better yet, just order your CZ directly from them with the match parts already installed.) With that simple change, the CZ goes from not as good as a SIG to as good as a SIG X5.

    • avatarPhrederick says:

      The competition hammer makes a world of difference, it’s 70 bucks if you install yourself or 190 bucks if you have CZ custom install them and tune the handgun.

      $530 for the gun, $190 for the custom work = $720, still cheaper than a new Sig 229 but much nicer in fit and feel. If you install the hammer yourself and polish the internals a little, you’re at the $600 mark.

  7. avatarBhayden says:

    CZ just started shipping their new handguns in a better plastic case without the box. They feel more durable- CZ dealer

  8. avatarJoseph says:

    I reckon if you like ‘em you like ‘em. Personally, I’d just as soon save up $550, and then save some more and buy a Sig. You really do get what you pay for, and the CZ is butt ugly. It’s kinda like the ugly girl in high school. She’s fun to play with but you don’t want anyone to see you.

    • avatarMatt in FL says:

      Which makes me ask: Who are you shooting for? Yourself, or anyone else who might see you?

    • avatarPhrederick says:

      You’re now the first person I’ve ever heard call the CZ’s ugly.

    • avatarJohn Cherubino says:

      I have over a dozen cz products….pistols and rifles. For the money they better perform than anything else i own. I have over 5000 rounds through my phantom without one failure of anykind. I’ve shot sigs and they seem loose and rattly to me. Their quakity is not the same as it once was but their prices remain very inflated. I’d pick one of my cz’s for a go to war pistol without a doubt in dependability.

    • avatarPaul Sitton says:

      Joseph, you sound like another closed minded individual that’s full of Bovine Shitology as Stormin Norman Swartscoff was quoted. My Glock 19 simply fades away when I pick up the CZ 75 P-01 I also own. The closest even a full sized weapon like my Beretta 72 FS can come, still falls short on the important features such as fun, really FUN on the range. I also own a Beretta 8000 D Cougar and have more experience with it and it too, is a top shooter. They are all a day late and a dollar short. It’s your money but in my world, money comes hard. The cost factor with a Sig or a Kimber just can’t be justified when you look at a CZ. CZ has quite possibly made the nearest thing to a perfect autoload that has ever been done. If you are only looking at the “Beautiful” part of an evaluation, why don’t you save a lot of money and invest in a pellet gun for looks.

  9. avatarAlex says:

    I’ve had mine for a couple years now and ~2000 rounds in, I can testify that the trigger cleans up nicely. As for the accuracy, I’m no crack shot, but I’ve never shot any other pistol that I could keep on a silhouette at close to 100 yards when I’m goofing around at the range. And even though it’s a bit bulky, it conceals very well even in the summer with an MTAC IWB holster. One more thing that wasn’t mentioned too: even from the first day, I’ve never had a FTE or FTF; over a wide variety of loads, nary a single hiccup.

    • avatarAuth says:

      I have to admit, I use to be an ardent anti-gun pesorn, but as the years progress I find it more and more difficult to just pass the blame on guns. I think it was Finland, who has the highest gun ownership in the world correct? And they have a very low murder rate as well. This is something that is ingrained in culture that requires much more than a piece of paper saying, No you can’t have this .

  10. avatarSean says:

    I own several CZ’s. They outshoot everything save for custom 1911′s. And one friends Sig 210. One of mine has 30000+ rds thru it. Not a single malfunction. Ever. I paid $300 for it several years ago. Honestly, I have no idea why anyone would spend twice as much for a SIG. And if you ever have a service issue, or want customizing advice…call the CZ Custom shop. Angus usually answers.

  11. avatarRecoveringAtheist says:

    Have a CZ75 Compact (all steel), full Kadet .22 (not just the conversion) and a self worked over all blue CZ85 Combat. The Combat shoots so well she made me sell my S&W 952-1.

    Love CZ.

  12. avatarDarth Mikey says:

    I recently scored an all-stainless 75B, and was fully expecting the scarred innards, but for whatever reason mine is as smooth inside as a good 1911 or SIG. However, I do notice some play in the lockup, and the accuracy isn’t as good as my SIG. (Paperwork says it’s a few years old–lack of any visible wear says the prior owner barely shot it.) Still, it feels good, looks sexy, eats anything, recoils barely, and I like the 1911-style safety. I’m still waiting for the trigger grit to smooth. Overall, a great investment (and not an expensive one).

  13. avatarRalph says:

    Comprehensive review and a great read!

    I hated the trigger much more than you did, GLK, but y’know, there’s an app gunsmith for that.

  14. avataruncommon_sense says:

    Why doesn’t a U.S. manufacturer make a similar pistol (e.g. hammer and not striker fired) pistol in a similar price range? I would buy one in an instant if they did.

  15. avatarPaul says:

    I have a CZ 75 D PCR. Out of the box, it was balls on accurate. This pistol handles well. It has an excellent hand to frame fit. The slide to frame fit is tight, no rattleing like a .45 ACP. The mags hold 14 rounds + one up the pipe. If you can’t take care of business with this kick-ass pistol, you need to crawl into a hole, and pull it in after you. Smith, Colt, Ruger, et all need to take a serious look at CZ, and see why those of us that like CZ, shoot CZ, and carry CZ’s!

    =

  16. avatarGaryinVT says:

    Robert, please keep this guy going! It may be repeatedly and repititously redundant, but I too enjoyed this review. A wicked lot.

  17. avatarChris Dumm says:

    The CZ-75 is one of the few great gun designs I’ve never shot. FWIW (probably very little, considering I’ve never shot one) I think the original version is sexier than the new Picatinny rail version. But they’re both drop-dead gorgeous.

  18. avatarJoe says:

    1st, people have a weird obsession with sigs. i am a range master with over 70 rental guns to look after and i can tell you in all honesty, a Sig will last HALF as long as a CZ. The only reason Sigs gain any favor over CZs (or any other pistol) is that the trigger is decent out of the box and almost every shooter on earth has absolutely terrible trigger control. Not to mention sigs are loaded with tons of stupid features that only a gunsmith who has been balls deep in one could tell you about (like a mag release retaining pin that can render the gun useless for ever if improperly installed)

    2nd, to quote the author:
    “Surprisingly, these problems rarely get mentioned outside of forums and never in reviews.”
    ………. Then they must not be actual problems then. If a gun’s “problems” are only brought out on forums…. then they must be experienced by people who spend more time behind the keyboard than the trigger. I work with dozens of CZ shooters and NEVER has any one of them told me about the burrs on the inside of the frame.

    Remember that the CZ-75′s only true function in life is war. That is how it was designed, and thats how its made. nothing fancy, nothing dumb.

    • avatarSean says:

      I know this to be fact. I have family that work at a gun range. They have had a CZ75 on the rental counter for 10+ years. The think it has somewhere around 250000 rounds. Still works perfectly. They have replaced everything else on the rental counter frequently(well except a few S&W revolvers).They also had a Kimber that went around half a million. Kimber heard about that, and bought it back.

  19. avatarM&B Strategies says:

    I love my P01. After about a year though, the mag springs crapped out. It was my EDC until the mag issues. 5 CZ mags all went about the same time. I have 5 new mags loaded now waiting a couple months to see what happens with them and trimmed wolf springs in the older mags.

    This gun points and shoots as well as any I’ve shot. I picked up for a song at an estate sale with every intention of turning it over for a profit…then I shot it. It has a happy home here.

  20. avatarUcsbKevin says:

    picked one up, felt great, slide release button was too far away from thumb though I think. Still might pick one up eventually

  21. avatarcounihan says:

    There seems to have been a resurgence in CZ interest in the last few years. This is driving the prices up on the used market. I’m glad that more shooters are discovering this ergonomics masterpiece, but saddened that they are gobbling up the once dirt cheap used pieces.
    Good review on a good weapon.

  22. avatarrevjen45 says:

    Recently bought a Cz75BD for $350 OTD (after missing a Sphinx .380 which was like a Rolex that shoots). DA and SA are smooth. It must have been shot enough to wear in because ther sure a lot of crud in it when I stripped for cleaning. Guess a gun that doesn’t work wouldn’t have a lot of firing residue. I will shoot it later today, which I’m looking forward to like a date with a pretty lady. Being full sized, I think my ECG will still be something smaller and the CZ will be for HD and car carry.

    • avatarDerek says:

      My EDC rig is a 75B in either a Comp-Tac MTAC or Fobus paddle riding on a Wilderness Instructor CSM belt. The belt makes a huge difference.

  23. avatarMichael says:

    I have the ugly-duckling cousin, CZ P-07 Duty 9MM, which I really do like both the looks and function of. Was my first CZ, but probably won’t be my last.

  24. My biggest problem with the P-01 is the DA/SA trigger with decocker.

    I could really dig an alloy framed CZ-75B compact with the traditional safety and ability to carry cocked and locked.

  25. avatarJohnInOKC says:

    For a great rifle, don’t forget the CZ550. They shoot really nice and are one of the few rifles that is actually stronger than a M98 due to no cuts on the recoil lugs, even though almost idential. I had one and loved it, but had the chance to trade the rifle for a badly needed camper. Since I was tired of getting cold and wet during hunting season, I made the trade. Stil not sure if I got the better end of the deal since it took a 10point buck at 200yards last winter with its new owner. It was a tack driver..:-( The Dan Wesson Pointman’s are very well made, mine will be buried with me because its not going anywhere in my lifetime. Of course, the only 9mm I’ve ever bought is a CZ75 which started all this. Great guns.

  26. avatarJoseph says:

    If I had the choice of a free CZ or buying a Sig…I’d take the Sig.

    • avatarPiedmont says:

      Joseph, wow, insightful comments. Can you you site your reasons why? I own both a CZ P-01 and SP2022. I believe they are both great guns. Very similar in size, weight, barrel length, DA\SA, even the grips, ect. I hate it when people make sweeping comments with no info.

  27. avatarmercadeo says:

    The P-01 was the first CZ model to benefit from updated manufacturing technology at CZ’s Uhersky Brod factory. The components of the P-01/P-06 are completely interchangable with every other P-01/P-06, with no individual fitting required. This required some very careful re-design so that the reliability and accuracy were not impaired. Since the time of its introduction (designed in 2001, NATO-approved in 2003) the production upgrades have been rolled out to most of the CZ 75 family and several new rifle models as well. The 1913 accessory rail easily accepts any of the industry-standard lights and lasers to assist low-light use. The P-01 is the only NATO-spec pistol on the market that is available to the public. After 3 years of some of the most aggressive small arms testing ever, the CZ P-01 won the honor of replacing the CZ 75s previously used by the Czech National Police.

  28. avatarCK says:

    I have nothing by love for my P-01. It’s very accurate, looks sharp and the trigger definitely loosens up after about 700 rounds. Just keeps getting better every time I use it, great updated review.

  29. avatarcomte says:

    if you like this one, try the CZ83, its the finest .380 made with the best trigger you have ever used…

  30. avatarDoug says:

    If I had to pick a “as close to perfect as a pistol can get” gun, it would be the P-01. Bought mine two years ago after shooting a friend’s P-01. In terms of ergonomics, the P-01 is the “anti-Glock”…it simply feels like it was molded for your own hand. Add in stunning accuracy, 100% reliability and it’s sturdy post-Soviet, Czech manufacturing quality, and you have a real winner.

    I’m sort of surprised this pistol isn’t more popular in the States. I’ve shot a LOT of pistols, and the P-01 is my hands-down favorite.

  31. avatarRon B says:

    I’ve had my P01 since Feb this year. It had a couple FTFeeds using Fiocchi fmj first range trip so I thought it needed some breaking in. Tested some Remington hollow points and feed fine. After a couple range trips with some Walmart Federal it was feeding fine, then got some Remington UMC Mega pack and it was doing it again but more consistently so off it went to CZ USA. About 4 weeks later they tell me they adjusted the extractor, polished the feed ramp, and a throat job. I just got the DPM mechanical recoil reduction 3 spring guide rod started to jam again but it was double feeding. I had the Bedair ss guide rod and 17lb Wolf spring in there before. I removed the extractor and spring to clean it in the cavity. I also disassembled, cleaned all the magazines housings, followers with some Rem oil wipes. I’ll have to see how she does at the range again. I might just give CZ USA a call again.

  32. avatarRon B says:

    Went to the range again and happy to report there were no failures of any kind after 100 rds down range. I did use the shorter of the 2 changeable outer spring that came with DPM mechanical recoil reduction system. The longer is supposed to be the stronger spring.

  33. avatarUSMCVeteran says:

    I purchased the CZ P-01 a few weeks ago and took it out to the range for some trigger time. I loved it’s feel and accuracy so much I decided to purchase a CZ 83 yesterday.

  34. avatarRon B says:

    I’m trying to bring his big brother home, the SP01. I just bought a Sig Sauer P220 Combat and contemplated on a P226 but for the value, quality, and accuracy, the CZ SP01 can’t be beat even though the P226 is still a must have in any collection.

  35. avatarBigK says:

    Fell in love with CZs when I got my C&R license and picked up a surplus CZ 82 (that’s the Russian version of a .380 only better). When my hands 1st loving caressed a P-01, I knew I’d be in trouble.

    If taken it to self-defense classes, carried it every day, used it to embarrass my Glock/S&W/XD friends at the range, and made Marksman at my 1st IDPA Classifier. It’s 100% stock and the trigger has smoothed so much you wouldn’t believe it hasn’t been altered.

    It’s the closest I’ve found to a perfect pistol.

    • avatarBigK says:

      BTW…In addition to what my wife calls WAY TOO MANY handguns, I have owned 7 CZs in all, now. My keepers were the CZ 82, CZ 75 Shadow, CZ 52, and my beloved P-01. Honorable mention goes to a ridiculously tricked out SP-01. They are Czimply amazing guns.

  36. avatarTucker says:

    I own Colt’s, Sigs and Beretta’s and just took delivery of my first CZ, a CZ SP-01 Tactical in .40SW and not just the machine work was horrible but the quality of the material on connecting surfaces was so potted I send them an email and told CZ-USA this kind of quality control was unacceptable. Some of my existing firearms with thousands of rounds fired through them (even a $270.00 Neo); with each of their slide connecting surfaces still as smooth as a baby’s butt not a pit not a ping on connecting surfaces and their connecting surfaces (receiver to slide) finishes still looking as good or better than this NEW CZ.

    The burring alone on the upper would have accelerated the ware/longevity of this firearm. I wish I could attach pics to visually show how piss poor the quality control was on this CZ!

    After sending CZ-USA an email describing my concerns they replied with a pre-paid FedEX label. After mic’ing a few areas and taking several pics I dent the CZ back FedEX. The following Mon. I sent them two of the pics I’d taken of the CZ; here’s their reply.

    “From: Warranty [mailto:Warranty@cz-usa.com]
    Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 8:00 AM
    To: Steve Tucker
    Subject: RE: To whom this may concern at CZ-USA

    Tucker,
    Those pictures look fine, that’s pretty clear. The metal was apparently not prepared properly, we will replace the gun most likely.”

    My reply:
    I agree and a complete replacement of the gun as a whole (both upper & lower) is the only resolve that will give me peace of mind at this point; even if this means waiting for CZ-USA to run the .40 Tactical again.

    Being a business owner myself I understand when others are involved and see their involvement as simply a weekly means and not owner minded in building the brand that will create their job security; stuff like this happens.

    As consumers; if we don’t hold company’s feet to the fire on their quality control of their products, they will feel even more confident than they do today in running their business as a number game!
    Tucker

  37. avatarStephen Benson says:

    After extensive online research I really wanted a P-01. I finally got one and immediately sold my Glock 19. Nothing against the Glock, just not my cup of tea. The grip, elegant looks and impressive accuracy make this my absolute favorite handgun I’ve ever owned (admittedly that’s only been six). I’ve only fired about 100 rounds so far, but a nice variety including BPLE’s, Critical Duty, WWB 115 grain FMJ, Federal Hydrashok, Remington HP, and Federal 115 grain FMJ. The P-01 shot all of them flawlessly and accurately. The hot BPLEs were surprisingly accurate. Love my CZ75 P-01. Nice review, by the way, but I have to agree with another poster: I don’t really care if the internals are rough looking, as long as the gun looks great (which it does) and performs well (which it does).

  38. avatarAshley Thornton says:

    This review was seriously awesome, thank you so much.
    I just bought my first gun ever and it’s the CZ75 P01. I knew the day I shot it we were meant to be together. Now I’m researching all the fixin’s I can do on it so your thoughts were very helpful! Thanks!

    • avatarRon B says:

      The best thing you can do is take it to the range and shoot it as much as you can. This will smooth up the trigger and slide. Polish the barrel and feed ramp. Start with 400, then 800, 1000 grit sand paper on the external barrel then polish with Flitz using a Dremel and polishing wheels to a mirror finish. You can buy the Cajun Gun Works Ultra Lite SD kit to lighten up the DA/SA pull and still have reliablity with the extended firing pin. Add some Slide Gluide Lite to the rails.

  39. avatardan stewart says:

    Many interesting comments here. All I can add is this: I’m originally a Browning Hi-Power guy (200,000+ rounds). Bought a used P-01 on a lark. Overall conclusion: Love it! Why?

    > Great feel in my hand.
    > Wonderfully accurate.
    > Not one firing malfunction yet (~2,000 rounds).

    It’s a pleasure to shoot. Only complaint: The narrow slide is a bit tough to rack.

  40. avatarLincoln D Chastain says:

    Can someome tell me if a 10rd mag for a cz75b and cz75p01 are the same.? I heard all 75 parts are interchangeable, true or false. thanks for any info

  41. avatarDipstick says:

    Well, I’m a ’65 Colt Python owner, so I know a great gun and trigger when I shoot one. I purchased a P-01 several years ago and it quickly became my go to gun. It readily eats any ammo you feed it and it’s accuracy is simply stunning.

  42. avatarchris says:

    how is the recoil in this cz 75 p -01? Is this made up of all metal or all alloy? Would You want a safety or decocker on it? Thanks

    • avatarDaniel says:

      Recoil: soft & manageable thanks to the relatively low bore axis and excellent grip.

      Slide is Stainless Steel, frame is aluminum alloy.

      I like the function of a decocker, but it does negatively effect trigger pull. A safety would be acceptable. If you check czcustom.com, you can find an updated version of the P-01 featuring a much improved trigger, competition hammer, safety instead of decocker, etc.

  43. avatardirk diggler says:

    i have a canik stingray-c that is the clone of this gun and the internals are awesome compared to the p-01

  44. avatarLowlight81 says:

    I have never owend a CZ but I just went into my local gun shop and checked out the CZ 75 p-01 in OD Green and it felt great in my hand and was think of buying it so I wanted to check out some reviews on it and after reading your review ill be picking it up. For my self for Xmas thanks for the great review. Also my local gun shop is asking 699.99 for it witch I thought was a little pricy what do u guys think

  45. avatarChris says:

    I have a SP-01 and a P-01 (compact). The compact was altered incredibly from cz custom and has a the 85c combat trigger, race hammer, polished internals, and aluminum grips… work of art..crisp 8lb DA, and crisp and smooth as butter 3lb SA pull.

  46. avatarShwiggie says:

    I’ve been slinging lead using one of these for a little over a year, and it is by far my favorite gun to shoot. For my hands, it’s the best feeling & fitting pistol I’ve yet come across. It’s quite accurate, and approximately 1500 rounds has done a real favor to the SA trigger…installing CGW’s Ultra-Lite/SD package did a similar favor for the DA pull. The only further alteration I’m planning to make is the addition of a set of night sights.
    I will say this, though: the detail strip is a pain in the duff. Don’t do it unless you’re confident in your reconstructive capabilities. I don’t know how I escaped the ensuing springocalypse.

  47. avatarJay H says:

    I got one of the P-01 customs with the manual safety, competition hammer, etc. from CZ Custom. I was a little disappointed to find that unlike my stock 75b, the safety could be engaged with the hammer down on the P-01. If you pull the trigger with the safety engaged, it tries to cock the hammer and then binds.

    Has anyone else run into this?

Leave a Reply

Please use your real name instead of you company name or keyword spam.