By Request: More Booth Babes by Nick Leghorn | Jan 18, 2012 | 20 comments facebook twitter linkedin email You are all very sick individuals. comments sdog says: January 18, 2012 at 20:14 whats with the red written on her torso? Reply Nick Leghorn says: January 18, 2012 at 20:16 Some new product. Wasn’t gun related, but I slowed down long enough to snap a picture of the goods. Reply sdog says: January 18, 2012 at 20:28 good move dude. Reply JOE MATAFOME says: January 18, 2012 at 20:24 I think the x20 is some sort of new gun lube or not, but who really cares. Reply Dorcil Brown says: January 19, 2012 at 03:28 Some sort of lube…. Reply Headoftheholler says: January 18, 2012 at 20:28 x20.org thermal imaging company. Why the paint again? Reply DrewR55 says: January 18, 2012 at 21:21 It shows up in the dark, I guess. Reply JS III says: January 18, 2012 at 21:28 Is it just me or does the brunette have a gut? Reply BC; MT says: January 18, 2012 at 21:38 Digestive tracts are universal. Oh wait, you were being rude. Reply Totenglocke says: January 18, 2012 at 21:52 Acknowledging that females can be as flawed as us “lowly” males is “being rude”? Reply Chris says: January 19, 2012 at 01:10 Well, when you’re paid to display product with your body, you probably should be somewhat fit or attractive or the point is kind of moot. Totenglocke says: January 19, 2012 at 14:07 I agree – hence why I was asking BC; MT why he was calling the guy rude for pointing out that she doesn’t seem quite qualified for the job. Robert Farago says: January 18, 2012 at 21:39 Cut Nick some slack. Not that I have. Or would. Or will. But word from the floor says he’s texting something seriously serious at the moment. So there’s hope for the boy yet. Reply Totenglocke says: January 18, 2012 at 21:53 Nick, if wanting to see (hopefully) attractive girls makes us “sick”, then that obviously alerts us to a particular aspect of your personality. Not that there’s anything wrong with that though…but you might be more comfortable in San Francisco than at a gun show. 😉 Reply Robert Farago says: January 18, 2012 at 22:00 See: http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2012/01/robert-farago/note-to-nick-those-arent-booth-babes/ Reply Totenglocke says: January 18, 2012 at 22:12 I’ve seen it – saw it before I posted actually, but my point stands. 🙂 Reply Ropingdown says: January 18, 2012 at 22:08 Nick was obviously raised very strictly, and fancies the allure is magnified by holding to the belief that the attraction is profane. Hey, maybe it works? Reply rosignol says: January 19, 2012 at 17:18 Nick appears to be unclear on why Booth Babes exist in the first place. Nick, are you trying to put these poor, hard-working girls out of a job? There are enough unemployed people as it is… 😉 Reply Matt in FL says: January 18, 2012 at 23:47 The brunette seems a victim of unflattering shorts and bad posture, mostly. I’m more worried about the blonde. Someone seems to have made off with a significant portion of her hindquarters. Reply gunman says: January 19, 2012 at 07:52 X20 must be her pants size. Reply Write a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email.