Irresponsible Gun Owner of the Day: Adolph Hiter

An article at nypost.com on one of Hitler’s ceremonial pistols caught the eye of Mike302000. The blogger called the deadly dull provenance post “fascinating.” Here’s the bit that entranced our friendly neighborhood gun grabber: “Of all his gifts, Hitler, who had a fondness for firearms, particularly prized the pistol and, after the day’s festivities, had the pistol shipped to Munich, where he kept it in a desk drawer in his apartment.” Mikeb goes there, equating Hitler’s [alleged] penchant for tacky pistols with American gunloonery. “Sounds like some of the guys I know,” Mikeb opines. “‘prized pistol,’ and ‘fondness for firearms’.” Well it sounds to me like Herr Hitler was an irresponsible gun owner . . .

Hitler’s mistake: leaving a gun unsecured in a drawer. In this fundamentally unsafe practice, there is linkage between the Führer and millions of American gun owners who keep a loaded firearm in a bedside table.

They do so they can retrieve their firearm with relative ease to counter a home invader, especially after waking up from a sound sleep. This despite the fact that many gun gurus counsel for at least one extra preparatory step before deployment (e.g., a safe combo), so that the gun owner can regain enough consciousness not to shoot the wrong person.

The other, more obvious issue: children and burglars can also retrieve the firearm from a bedside table with relative ease. Bad things can and do happen when bedside guns go walkies, from thieves selling the weapon to murders, to criminals using the gun to murder the gun owner, to a genetically inadvisable negligent discharge.

Balancing the need for quick access to a firearm with safety is a bitch. Best solution: a quick-access bedside safe like the one (9G INPRINT) we’ll be reviewing later this week.

But if you really feel the need to have a loaded gun right handy at night—which is illegal in some states—a responsible gun owner should develop a morning routine wherein they return the firearm or firearms to a safe. Or to their person, for home or concealed carry. Every. Single. Time.

While we’re at it, there’s a tendency to treat certain guns as art objects rather than guns, as some are both. But never forget that a gun is a gun is a gun. It must be treated with safety and respect—even if it comes from one of the vilest creatures ever to have walked on planet Earth.

Oh, and if Hitler’s gun’s solid gold, that would present a reliability issue. Just sayin’ . . .

comments

  1. avatar justin says:

    More like irresponsible army owner of the day.

  2. avatar TTACer says:

    Godwin proves correct again.

    1. avatar Robert Farago says:

      It’s a natural law or something.

  3. avatar James Felix says:

    “Hitler’s mistake: leaving a gun unsecured in a drawer.”

    Hitler’s desk was presumably in some kind of military installation surrounded by trained infantrymen, not a standard private home. Also, any children that were likely to come across the gun were almost definitely trained in the use of firearms. Indeed, that late in the war many of them were serving in the military.

    Which means Hitler was a genocidal monster, a poor military strategist and a terrible painter… but not an irresponsible gun owner. It also means MikeB is an idiot.

    1. avatar Jeff O. says:

      Also, I’m fairly certain there were no biometric safes in the 1940’s.

      Actually, this reminds me of the “Peter Hilter” clip from Family Guy. (50 second mark and the 1:43 mark)

  4. avatar Esteve says:

    I’m in agreement with James on this one (not the idiot part, as I don’t know MikeB). One would have to think that the insane and paranoid Adolph’s “apartment” was a pretty secure dwelling.

  5. avatar CUJO THE DOG OF WAR says:

    Only a meth addict freak like hitler would find that pimp handgun to be attractive. nazi bling-he would have had spinners on the Tiger tanks too, if they’d been around then.

    1. avatar TTACer says:

      lulz I can just picture those tigers rollin’ on dubs. No wonder they lost. Maybe they if they had put more thought into production considerations and less on Hugo Boss style for all their pimped out gats. Just look at a Sten or Grease Gun vs. a MP40 or STG 44.

  6. avatar Ralph says:

    Who was that Hiter guy in the headline? Was he a Glock armorer?

  7. avatar Gunnutmegger says:

    LOL, +1 James.

    But the interesting part of RF’s post was:

    “An article at nypost.com on one of Hitler’s ceremonial pistols caught the eye of Mike302000.”

    What exactly is it that catches his eye?

    How about a new thread where we can all make guesses about what MikeB has in his favorites?

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email