This is Not the Field Goal Defense You’re Looking For by Robert Farago | Feb 04, 2011 | 4 comments facebook twitter linkedin email comments Magoo says: February 4, 2011 at 10:50 Clays are cheaper and waterfowl are more difficult. Apparently, these individuals simply have a deep-seated resentment of footballs. Perhaps some scarring left over from when Coach cut them all those years ago; who can say. In their next video, these guys show the broad side of a barn they are not to be trifled with. With a less annoying soundtrack, I hope. Reply Ralph says: February 4, 2011 at 12:48 I would have used a rifle, preferably with ball ammunition. Reply Roy Hill says: February 4, 2011 at 13:21 The same principal would apply in basketball, too. Of course, you’d need a heck of a lot more ammo, and you’d just get called for “goal tending” repeatedly. But would you actually care? Reply AuricTech says: February 4, 2011 at 13:40 Of course, if the quarterback uses the shotgun effectively, you might not even need to attempt a field goal…. Reply Write a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email.