Gun Review: Ruger SP101 3″

61 responses

  1. avatar
    February 21, 2011

    Having just picked up an SP101 (3″ 357Mag) I’d have to agree with your points, both high and low. Being a newbie shooter, though, I can’t give comments about other revolvers, unfortunately–the only other pistols I have is the 357LCR and a MkII Gov Target. Only change I’ve made thus far to the gun is to take a bit of sandpaper around the trigger guard, up top, to take off a sharp edge. I did buy a set of Hogue monogrips–and found that while they fit my left hand they don’t in my right. Weird.

    One detail I’d like to point out is noise. I’ve noticed that the extra 1+” of the SP101 makes for a fair amount of noise reduction, over the same ammo in the 357LCR. It’s not whisper quiet of course, but enough to notice. A few rounds of that and then it’s nice to shoot the 22 again. Not everyone is going to do well with a loud bark, if they are newbies.

    [Actually, I'm starting to wonder if regular practice with something that has more recoil is wise: work with flinch control on something with recoil, and then when you go back to more tame guns suddenly it's far less work to shoot those. Food for thought (for advanced shooters, no doubt).]

    Otherwise, yeah, SP101 in 3″ isn’t a pocket gun, needs to be on the hip; then you wonder about only 5 shots. The 327Mag, though, I thought was a low recoiling gun. But the SP101 in 327Mag has that adjustable rear site, which is even more of a snag issue. In some ways I think I’d rather have that round, to have the classic 6 rounds *and* less recoil (which I’m not a fan of).

    But the SP101 is too pretty of a gun to not have one of.

    [On edit]Forgot to add, the SP101 has a near-full grip. That helps too–getting that pinky on does help with control.

  2. avatar
    February 21, 2011

    Oh, and as a side note, I recently traded my LCR (in 38spl) for the 357LCR, as I found the 38spl version to simply have too much recoil. Darn thing flips up in my hand, and bruises the top part of my thumb base. The heavier 357 version of course does this much less, with the same 38spl in non +P. But inspite of the extra weight I still think it works as a pocket gun, with a pretty decent trigger and sights. [But HKS speedloaders really don't work with it.]

    Not that the LCR’s are really good for beginners at all–but let’s face it, snubbies are what many beginners gravitate towards (if they didn’t go 380 or Glock in the first place).

  3. avatar
    February 21, 2011

    they were shooting 50 feet not 25 yds (75 ft)

  4. avatar
    Chris Dumm
    February 21, 2011

    The SP-101′s front sight is a snap to replace, but the rear sight notch has no mounting holes or dovetail, and that kind gunsmithing work gets expensive fast.

  5. avatar
    February 21, 2011

    Smith & Wesson 686+. Really good sights, seven rounds instead of five or six. The same things that make it a good shooter make it less than ideal for concealed carry. Great sights have a high profile and can snag. The hammer is exposed, but its low position protects it during a draw. It won’t hang up. It fires .38SPL without undue recoil. It looks good and handles well. Loaded with .357 Mags, it will stop anything. Available in 2.5, 3, 4 and 6 inch barrel lengths. What more do you want?

    • avatar
      February 21, 2011

      Too heavy to carry comes to mind.

      • avatar
        February 21, 2011

        It’s heavy all right, but not too heavy. It needs a good holster and belt, but forget IWB unless you buy your pants from MC Hammer.

      • avatar
        December 13, 2013

        Do some pushups sally. The sp101 is one of the easiest weapons out there to carry concealed. I, like many other grown ass men, carry an N frame concealed. Sack up.

  6. avatar
    Brad Kozak
    February 21, 2011

    Suggested book titles (to avoid copyright infringement), from the home office in Fargo, North Dakota:

    10. K.I.S.S.: Keep It Simple(er), Shooter!
    9. The Redneck’s Guide to Revolvers
    8. The Dummy’s Guide to Personal Defense
    7. The Moron’s Handbook for Modern-Day Muskets
    6. Firearms for Fatheads
    5. The Fool’s Guide to Firearms
    4. Boomsticks for Boneheads
    3. Wheelguns for Wussies
    2. The Stupid Git’s Guide to Guns (U.K. edition)

    And the number one suggested title to avoid copyright infringement:

    1. Pistols for Pinheads

    Thank you. I’ll be here through Thursday. Try the veal.

    • avatar
      Jeff O.
      February 21, 2011

      Is the U.K. edition simply 500 blank pages?

  7. avatar
    February 21, 2011

    American Kenpo Karate Association Grand Master John McSweeny (now deceased) was a great proponent of point shooting. He taught many civilian and law enforcement individuals over decades. While he carried a 1911 .45 for security work, he always taught with a steel S&W Bodyguard five shot .38. He felt that the revolver was easiest to learn, that the Bodyguard’s shrouded hammer was easiest to carry and a steel gun easiest to control recoil for new shooters.

  8. avatar
    Brett Solomon
    February 21, 2011

    I am just not the revolver expert, but I wonder if anything in oft-forgotten Taurus catalog would fit the bill. There have been so many iterations through the years, and I think the Hecho en Brasil (I am also not a Portuguese expert) guys would love to something with you. As would Charter who loves them a special edition anything…

  9. avatar
    David B
    February 21, 2011

    A note on the ergonomics comments. That is not a thumb indentation, it is to allow use of speed loaders. And yes, it usually is inadequate, but can be fixed with a little sanding.

  10. avatar
    February 21, 2011

    Since it’s new and imported, availability may be an issue. But I think a Chaippa Rhino would be a perfect beginner’s gun. I heard that the production models have a much better trigger.

    • avatar
      October 30, 2012

      Rhino revolver is a good weapon for anyone. I have 2″ version. Very easy trigger pull in single action, once you pull cocking lever back for single action it stays in single action where trigger pull is much lighter. Double action is a heavier pull. Actually, initially had to do a “double finger” pull but as hand strength developed. back to using one finger. Same way I started with my Ruger LCR. Just a matter of using something to strengthen trigger finger. Design directs recoil into wrist instead of palm. Even with 357 ammo little felt recoil, little muzzle flip. Shooting 38 + p. rounds, no felt recoil, imperceivable muzzle flip. Supply much more available now on-line and even saw same model 2″ Rhino at Cabelas the other day.

      Bottom barrel design is brilliant. Wish other gun manufactures would adopt a similar design. Barrel: 2 inches,
      Overall Length: 6 inches
      Weight (unloaded): 25 ounces
      Grips: Rubberized black synthetic
      Capacity: 6

  11. avatar
    February 21, 2011

    I’ve been thinking about getting one of these lately to complement my LCR.
    I just wish there was a 6-shot .38 version of the SP101, my Detective Special fits in a SP101 holster, so it seems like there should be enough space in the cylinder!

  12. avatar
    joe tony
    February 22, 2011

    I have a Ruger SP101 in .357. I forgot it in east Texas. I am going to work in Amarillo for a while and am picking up a 6 shot .38 snubby (Taurus). Not my ideal choice buy will fit the bill.

  13. avatar
    Mike B
    February 23, 2011

    I bought a pair of Ruger SP 101s when I was training a lot of beginners to shoot handguns. One is a 3″ .357 like the one in the article. The other is a 4″ .22. The grips are identical. I start beginners on the .22 and when they get comfortable with that we move up to the .357 with commercial FMJ .38 special ammo.

    One more reason why the SP 101 is a great gun for training new shooters.

  14. avatar
    February 24, 2011

    I think the S&W Model 64 might be a good candidate with a 4 inch barrel. It’s really not too hard to conceal with a proper holster, and the fact that it’s in a holster should alleviate concerns about the hammer snagging on the draw (though for pocket carry, get a gun with a shrouded hammer). Inexpensive, police trade-ins readily available on the used market, good trigger, low recoil, and plenty durable.

  15. avatar
    March 7, 2011

    I’ve owned a 3″ SP101 for about 15 years. It’s everything you say and “more”. And, by that, I mean it’s capable of excellent accuracy….if you could only use the sights.

    Any double action revolver requires practice to master and retain proficiency with. The lousy SP101 sights not only make hitting the target difficult, they make practice a chore. But on days when everything’s working in its favor and the lighting is perfect, the SP101 will amaze you with its accuracy. I don’t know whether anyone offers a custom sight package for this revolver, but someone should. With good sights, it would be one fun puppy at the range.

    • avatar
      Robert Farago
      March 7, 2011

      XS sites. Test coming…

  16. avatar
    March 9, 2011

    Thinking much as you do, 10 years (?) ago I chose for my daughter a Ruger SP101, but in four-inch barrel with windage-adjustable sights, and since the 32 H&R Magnum was then available, I also selected that load. Sadly, it’s not a tack-driver for accuracy, but it certainly fulfills its role for self-defense. I did not believe she would use it in the concealed role, so the exposed hammer (and four-inch barrel) were not an issue. It’s one great advantage – in a 30-ounce package, this revolver is one you (or she) can shoot all day.

    I put significant money into gunsmithing – re-profiling the trigger for small hands, smoothing the action, and having a custom-made front sight fabricated, none being available for purchase at the time. Its bullet-proof, or even bomb-proof, nature was a part of the purchase decision; I know if it ever requires factory service, Ruger techs will “improve” it back to factory spec.

    Still, for concealed carry the stats on revolvers are pretty poor – 25% hit rates, IIRC, and that includes trained police. They are belly guns, indeed, even with longer barrels.

    • avatar
      The Burque Kid
      August 15, 2012

      Any pistol is only as accurate as it’s shooter. Bernard Goetz was carrying a Smith and Wesson, and he hit his four targets five times with five shots.

  17. avatar
    March 13, 2011

    I had a trigger job done on my SP101 and that helped a lot. I carry mine OWB .

  18. avatar
    March 24, 2011

    Still waiting on the S&W model 60 review!

    • avatar
      Robert Farago
      March 24, 2011

      It’s coming.

  19. avatar
    May 27, 2011

    You are a man after my own heart. I have transitioned a lot of my previously gun-novice acquaintances into gun ownership using the same criteria for a first gun.

    When I go through safety with them, I start however with a single action revolver (ruger single six) because all I want to focus on is basic trigger discipline, aiming, and getting them used to the noise. I find single action to be a more controllable gun (for ME) to be in the hands of a first time shooter. There are more opportunities for me to intervene if something unsafe is happening. Also, the single action revolver instills a mechanical intuition regarding the parts and function of the gun. There is something to be said for seeing and manipulating all the relevant parts yourself.

    After an hour or so instilling trigger discipline and basic safety, aiming, shooting, I move to a double action revolver with .38 special target loads. Similar platform to what you describe in this article except a 4 inch barrel.

    For recommending a first gun, I usually recommend something like what you describe. 3″-4″ barrel, and FIXED sights. Fixed sights are really all most people need. I have NEVER had a revolver with fixed sights which I couldn’t shoot on point with commercial ammo with more than adequate defensive accuracy. My goal in recommending a gun for a first time shooter is keeping it as SIMPLE as possible. What people don’t seem to understand is that 99.9% of the time THEY are the variable when it comes to shooting. I’ve noticed if there is a screw or adjustment around to be screwed or adjusted, people tend to screw and adjust rather than practice.

  20. avatar
    September 18, 2011

    Suggested book main title:
    Your First Self-Defense Gun
    Protect yourself from being victimized
    How to safely and effectively use your new gun
    Don’t be a helpless victim of criminal violence

    The SP101 with its 3″-barrel comes as close as I can imagine. However, based on your stated requirements and criticisms of the SP101 I suspect that there is not one gun to unite them all. Perhaps the brand new version of the SP101 in 22LR with 8-rounds can be an ideal introduction training gun, and a SP101 .357 3-barrel a new gun owners first serious SD gun. If Ruger ever releases a .22 Mag version SP101 with a 4.5″ or 5″+ barrel with sights such as the new SP101 22LR has that would be interesting to consider (ok, no more dreaming for now).

    Many interesting comments here. I did not know that revolvers have such a lower hit rate than pistols. While I suspect the shooting case specifics do not exist in compiled detail, I would be curious to learn about the details such as calibers, number of bullets fired, how much training or practice time the shooter had, etc.

    This summer I bought the SP101 .357 in a 3″-barrel though I have not yet fired it. After shooting it for about a year, I will probably pay for SP101 custom work to release its full potential.

  21. avatar
    Larry T
    October 12, 2011

    I’m getting one, though with the 2.25″ barrel, going to get the Hogue combat gribss for it and a XS Big Dot for the front, should make a perfect first gun, home defense and carry weapon. Thoughts?

    • avatar
      Robert Farago
      October 12, 2011

      Good idea.

  22. avatar
    Larry T
    October 12, 2011

    Hey Robert, when are we going to see a review of the beast you sent to Gemini Customs???

  23. avatar
    Brian L
    October 26, 2011

    Good choice Robert.
    I own this weapon and have bought one for my daughter. We both shoot tight groups into silouette targets from suggested combat distances. The only things I might change on this piece would be to bob the hammer spur and lighten the trigger pull. As far as sights go, I prefer to “point” the weapon at center mass rather than aim it along its fixed sight. Fancy glow-in-the-dark sights would not be of much use in a rapid response situation. If I were to need something more to stop an assailant, I would opt for an 8 inch Python with tritium sights and a lazer hanging on for extra measure. But then, there goes concealablity!

    • avatar
      December 23, 2011

      “But then, there goes concealability!”

      And your wallet.

  24. avatar
    December 8, 2011

    I also like the 3″ 101, but not the sights. I put a J frame Smith rear sight on mine. Much better. Ruger also looks like they have heard our pleas. On their website I just saw a 4″ version of the 101 with the same frame as the new .22 with adjustable sights. Terrific!

  25. avatar
    December 9, 2011

    I just bought one of these guns last night but mine has Crimson Tide Laser Grips on it which appear to be factory installed as they have the ruger crest on them. I have found one post about the one with the 2.25″ barrel one having factory installed Crimson Tide laser grips, but can’t seem to find anything else. Just trying to get some more info…’s this years model, it came with the first shell with a fired date of 03/11. Anyone with any more info would be great. Thanks

  26. avatar
    December 11, 2011

    I own the Ruger SP101, two and a half inch barrel hammerless in .357 magnum, it is a real solid and well built weapon, I do not care too much for the sights, the other day took the weapon out to do some target practice at relatively close range 10 yards with some .38 special rounds, every shot hit very low, had to raise the front sight over the level of the rear sight to hit the target ! I have to admit I like shooting the Taurus model 85 much better than the SP101, much easier to hit the target at shorter self-defence ranges , atleast it is for me !

    • avatar
      clinton whitley
      March 13, 2014

      I just bought the sp101 in 4.2 inch barrel with green fiber optics front sight it shoots very well in the 38sp very small group at 25 yards I am in no way a new shooter but have never shot the revolvers very much ,even tho I own 5 pistols in 22 to 9mm I feel at this time this ruger might be best handgun I have ever owned I would have nothing changed on this gun PS I like this gun and sure most people out there will also it is so easy to keep on target and fiber optics make it a plus

  27. avatar
    December 12, 2011

    I like the look of the adjustable sights now on the new 4” .22 and .357. It would be nice to think that they might use that frame/sights combination with 3” as well. It is probably too much to hope for the 2”.

  28. avatar
    Alan Agurkis
    January 9, 2012

    I owned a Ruger SP101 years ago when they were still relatively new. I found the rear sight channel was too narrow and the gun consistently shot to the left. With a small jeweler’s file I widened that channel and moved the POI right. I also painted the front sight with glow-in-the-dark paint from Cabelas. I smoothed out some of the sharp edges including the sides of the hammer. The gun became one of my favorite carry guns and I could hit with it quite well. As a demonstration to student shooters at the range I once banged up a cantaloupe sized rock at 100 yards. I got all hot for a Browning Hi-Power in .40 S&W and used the SP101 for trading material. The Browning was the best “duty gun” I used but I still miss that SP101. I believe I will get another in 3 inch. The reason for carrying two of such guns is the reload. If for some reason the first five shots don’t get the job done-instead of wasting time with a reload you simply pull another gun! I have been packing heat since around 1967 and I have shot all manner of semi-autos but I still prefer the revolvers for simplicity, accuracy, and reliability. I still pack a S&W 642 but the SP101 has to be one of the best for either new or experienced shooters. They all require a lot of shooting!! Cheap .38′s or handloads for practice are great and the guns will shoot ‘em all. Then you can always put the high octane loads in for serious work. The guns will shoot them too. Practice, practice, practice.

  29. avatar
    January 13, 2012

    My wife bought the SP101 because it meets all the qualifications stated in your blog. It’s the perfect beginners weapon with little that can wrong. However like you mentioned the front sight is not great espeically when shooting at black targets or in low light. What I haven’t seen in any of the responses except one, was a suggested replacement sight. The one of painting glow in the dark is not what she wants. She just wants something white. Any thoughts?

    • avatar
      Robert Farago
      January 14, 2012

      XS Big Dot.

  30. avatar
    January 21, 2012

    Yes, it’s a bit big for concealed carry, but that’s just an excuse to go shopping for a bigger purse :)

    I, too, was shooting a bit to the left with mine at the range, but after a slight adjustment in stance it was better.

    Practice practice practice!

  31. avatar
    Mike C
    January 21, 2012

    I think the SP101 is a great revolver, but leaving aside the credibility of the claim of any .357 Mag round as “Mother of All Manstoppers” (yeah, I’m well aware of the “research” Marshall and Sanow have propagated on the subject and their questionable cause-and-effect conclusions), a .357 Mag round does not achieve especially impressive muzzle energy coming out of a 3″ barrel. Clock a few out of the barrel and compare with +P .38s and see how they stack up. I think you will find that the gain in energy is not as impressive as the increase in muzzle flash (detrimental in low-light conditions), blast, and recoil.

    If Magnum rounds are to be carried, the shooter should be practicing with the same rounds — not lower power rounds — so that in the event of a firefight, the more severe recoil is not a dangerously distracting surprise.

    • avatar
      September 5, 2012

      I believe you are referring to the 2 1/4″ and under barrels. It aint as good as 4″ on up, but the 3″ gets ALOT more than the snubbies (which I agree with you) truly rob the 357 of what it means to be a 357. They make some 357 short barrel loads the 3″ really excells at.

  32. avatar
    February 11, 2012

    I just bought the sp101 .327 and was surprised how easy the .32 shot through it and how easy the recoil was. I just recently got some .327 ammo and shot them today. Holy crap the recoil was really punishing on my hand. I have a .357 cowboy pistol and the difference between the .357 and the .38 ammo was not really big difference like the difference between the .32 and .327 with the sp101 3″.
    The sp101 with .327 kicks heck of a lot more than the .357 cowboy 4.75 barrel.
    I found I really have to hold the sp101 really secure or my hand really says… hell no! I know the longer barrel I should expect less recoil but sheesh what a difference. I sure was not expecting this mule kick. I defintely will only use the .327 ammo sparingly and mostly use the .32 ammo for practice.

  33. avatar
    Joe K
    March 4, 2012

    I’ve had a 15 year love/hate relationship with a spurless 2-1/4″ barrel.

    It is a rugged and well built weapon as are all Rugers. The accuracy of something with a short barrel is amazing. The only drawbacks to me are 1. the stock grip is too small for large hands. If you have a pinky hanging off then accuracy will suffer. A Hogue grip solves that problem. For medium and small hands the stock rubber grip should be fine. Drawback #2 is a problem with every factory Ruger I’ve ever fired. The trigger pull is heavy and gritty. Dropping the hammer spring down to a 8# and polishing the trigger group contact point makes it the sweetest gun on the planet. Grips can run from $20 up to hundreds if you want to get really fancy. I spent (remember this was 15 years ago) $2 for a spring set and $10 for a nylon grip and was happy ever since. The only thing I really dislike about this gun is the noise and muzzle flash. But that’s what you have to live with if you want a short barrel.

  34. avatar
    March 16, 2012

    I agree with gman.
    You can get the SP101 in .327 federal magnum. With that you get one more round in the cylinder, adjustable rear sights, the ability to practice with .32 long ammo, and if you feel the need, you can get Hogue rubber grips for less than $20.
    I’m actually considering getting the SP101 in this configuration to compliment my GP100.

  35. avatar
    4 ton
    March 26, 2012

    big gun make big boom me happy

  36. avatar
    Ray G
    June 16, 2012

    I recently got the 4″ barrel version. Sights: adjustable and great! Grips: get the Hogue nylon or rubber one instead; much better. Concealable: Not in a pocket, but maybe in a holster.
    Bottom line: what was great got better!

  37. avatar
    September 5, 2012

    This may well be the best gun for a one gun person (why someone would have only one gone is beyond me because there are so many different roles). This would be the person who has been around guns alot but still only has a passing interest and knows they will only have a gun for the chance that something goes bump in the night and they can grab it from the sock drawer. This revolver needs little maintenance, less training for basic function as a point blank, pull the trigger gun than semi platforms and that 3″ barrel gives way better ballistics and sight radious than the snubbies and can still be stuck in a front pocket (with an uncle mikes holster for around $10) for that night walk to the gas station. Its a near perfect camping/trail gun that you can load near anything in: Snakeshot, 38′s, +P’s, low recoil 357′s, 357′s, hard cast 180-200grainers for black bear, 125grain screamers for two legged creeps. A truck gun is cool but if you were to CC the thing then you should really practice with it and not just stick it in a holster and go.
    In short, at 27oz this J frame can shoot all 357 ammo without hurting you or the gun (unlike the 12-15oz alloy guns that literaly go off in your hand like a grenade and you dont even get the beneifit of decent ballistics because of the snubby barrels which neuter the 357) and can be stuffed in your front pocket for a period of time.

  38. avatar
    January 9, 2013


  39. avatar
    March 16, 2013

    I own the short bbl version of the SP101 .357. Hogue grips are required accessory. Ruger has stopped putting that nubby rubber blob of a grip on their GP100′s now and have gone to a Hogue. Not sure about the current SP101′s. Great gun as are all Ruger stainless steel revolvers. You could not give me one of those polymer revolvers they make now. Every time I have let someone shoot my SP101, they tell me they own and or carry a S&W revolver and that they are going to sell it and get a Ruger. Nuff said.

  40. avatar
    Mud Beast
    July 1, 2013

    I have both the Ruger SP101 and the GP100. Am I the only one here who thinks the SP101′s trigger sucks? The pull is WAY too heavy; a lot of buyers get Wolf Springs to lessen the pull (and in my case I had a gun smith do a spring/trigger job because my wife could only pull the trigger with 2 fingers…one from each hand). BTW she loves the GP100′s trigger. How could Ruger get the trigger so right on the GP100 and so wrong on the SP101? It’s as though Ruger quasi-markets the SP101 to women and others with smaller hands (ala the small grips) and then makes a trigger that is hard for most women to pull…

  41. avatar
    Mountain Dog
    July 12, 2013

    I recently bought a SP 101 6 inch 6 shooter. I’ve put a few hundred rounds through it both 38 and 357 hollow point. I never miss even at 25 yards. This revolver is solid.
    The 357 is very loud with a big flash. almost the loudest on the range,but the kick is moderate. I’ve put 200 rounds through it in a half hour with no problem. The cylinder gets hot but who wouldn’t. This is my first revolver. I bought it for home defense after a home invasion that I was able to fend off with my loud voice. I would have preferred to have my new Ruger, but then there would have been some messy consequences. Hopefully, it won’t happen again,but I feel much safer with this baby !

  42. avatar
    July 20, 2013

    Replace the springs, do a trigger job and replace the front sight. I used XS Standard Dot. For my wife’s 2.25 barrel we got Hogue grips. My 3″ has some nice aftermarket inserts from Chig’s. These are solid pistols that shoot will and hold up. Work the action and go through some ammo at the range.

  43. avatar
    Sierra JB
    August 30, 2013

    I have a relatively “rare” Ruger SP101 in .38 Special ONLY. It’s the 3 inch with Hogue grips. As all have agreed, it’s a beautiful tank of a gun built for ease and dependability. My wife and kids have had great success in shooting this with no issues. I’ve entertained the thought of selling or trading it for a small semi-auto (like a Sig 238), but haven’t pulled the trigger on that decision yet. Love this gun!

  44. avatar
    October 13, 2013

    Great review!

    The only part is disagree with is the author’s exception to using an exposed hammer on the SP-101 model with a three inch barrel. Even a complete neophyte gunman would have to be remarkably uncoordinated in order to snag or inadvertently cock the hammer on the draw.

    NOT that an SP-101 would fire, anyway! Remember, Ruger’s revolver design employs a TRANSFER BAR. A Ruger revolver WILL NOT FIRE unless the shooter’s finger is, also, on the trigger.

    Furthermore, when you stop to think about it, that exposed hammer AND three inch barrel ARE NECESSARY for those, ‘longer shots’ the author CORRECTLY RECOMMENDS women to make when confronted by an equally well-armed (and closing) dangerous attacker.

    I own an SP-101 in 357 magnum; it has a three inch barrel, an exposed hammer, and a large Hogue Monogrip on it. It’s one of those guns that you buy once, and keep for life! Frankly – if, ‘push ever comes to shove’, and I really had to – I would not have the slightest qualm about having to fight for my life with this superlative, ‘little’ revolver.

    It’s a rock-solid winner that most people are actually going to be able to hit the target with! (As the article points out: NOT an easy thing for many lightly experienced handgun shooters to do with any small revolver; AND the SP-101 is an easy gun to practice – a lot – with.)

    • avatar
      Tom Wenger
      November 6, 2013

      Your comments have me nearly convinced to buy the 3″ exposed hammer SP101 Ruger, but could you expound on your comment about these characteristics being NECESSARY for self-defense “longer shots”? Also,do you have an opinion about laser sights for this model?

  45. avatar
    Charles H
    February 8, 2014

    I agree with most of this review however, let me say that I have carried this revolver for three years and I am a very small framed man I stand at 5′ 6″ and weigh 170 lbs. The 2″ barreled model is not a pocket gun per se as it is a tad larger than a j frame but if you choose your clothing carefully and dress around your weapon there is no problem with concealment. This is a hefty revolver but I should point out that many people who complain about the weight of this revolver are many times carrying heavier pistols or revolvers on a daily basis. I am going to have the hammer bobbed on my 2″ to take care f the hammer snagging and then have an XS 24/7 big dot night sight installed to make it suitable for low light. With the concealability, durability, accuracy and the dependability of the SP 101 the added weight is well worth it.

  46. avatar
    Jon Bradley
    March 20, 2014

    Check out Trijicon’s tritium replacement front sight for the SP101. Tritium is mildly radioactive, and the little dot inset in the sight lights up at night. When you practice at a range, try using the front sight only. Brownells carries this sight: #892-000-009WB…Mfr Part” RR14F. Crimson Trace grips are a good choice, too. If you equip a SP101 with both, you’re good to go with the front sight only when the batteries fail in the CT grips (as mine have).

  47. avatar
    April 6, 2014

    For those of us that are old school and don’t speak modern day Swahili.
    why not just say what this is WYSIWYG. instead of abbreviating it?
    You wrote the rest of the article out why not this/

Leave a Reply




Back to top
mobile desktop