The relatively subdued brouhaha over Sarah Palin’s caribou killing session got me thinking about the hunting industry’s sensitivity to the sensitive issue of animal-lover’s sensitivities. In general, they don’t have any. And why should they? The hunting industry is gi-friggin’-normous. Tens of millions of Americans see nothing wrong with killing animals with guns—to the point where they spend over a billion dollars doing so. I guess the “problem” with watching Ms. Palin re-stocking the happy hunting grounds with a caribou is that the audience includes people who would no more watch a hunting channel than roast a baby on a spit. I have a message for them: it could have been, often is, a lot worse. How? You don’t want to know. But the poster above gives you an indication.
-
Search The Truth About Guns
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
TTAG Gun Reviews
Recent Comments
- Lucas D. on Dog the Bounty Hunter Supports The Second Amendment But . . .
- Stinkeye on Bill Would Allow Importation Korean M1 Garand, Carbine Rifles
- Stinkeye on Bill Would Allow Importation Korean M1 Garand, Carbine Rifles
- MikeH on U.S. Army: M4 Replacement Candidates Weren’t Reliable Enough
- Jürgen on Supreme Court: You Must Invoke Your Right to STFU
-
Categories
- Ammo
- Ask Foghorn
- ATF Death Watch
- Business
- Competition
- Concealed Carry
- Crime and Punishment
- Defensive Gun Use of the Day
- EDC for CCW
- Editorials
- Entertainment
- Fun and Games
- Gear
- Gear Review
- Gun Control
- Gun Nation
- Gun Review
- Guns for Beginners
- Handguns
- Housekeeping
- Hunting
- I Am A Gun Owner
- Irresponsible Gun Owner…
- Law and Order
- Media
- News
- NRA
- NRA Convention
- Open Carry
- Personal Defense
- Podcast
- Police Procedure
- Question of the Day
- Quote of the Day
- Rifles
- SHOT Show
- Shotguns
- Team FNH USA
- Training & Technique
- Uncategorized
- War
Meta
-










I am offended by the image of a cigarette. What kind of a message does that send to young groundhogs?