Gun Review: Springfield Armory Sub-Compact XD

When the Brits first clapped eyes on the Routemaster bus in 1954, they were understandably reluctant to jump on board. The ‘Double Decker” looked decidedly top-heavy. So the Associated Equipment Company filmed an unladen Routemaster tear-assing around a race-track whilst remaining vertical. Fantasia’s dancing hippos looked equally graceful, but point taken. The British subjects (who didn’t really have a choice anyway) clambered on the “London Bus” for the next 61 years. It’s something to keep in mind when you grab a Springfield Sub-Compact XD, a pistol with more than a passing resemblance to a Double Decker . . .

Unlike the UK’s two-story public conveyance, the Springfield Sub-Compact XD is ill-proportioned in all directions. Though glove-friendly, the trigger guard looks like the stretched image on one of those early 16:9 TVs. Without a pinkie extension (pictured), the grip belongs on a half-scale mock-up. Compared to the drop-dead sexy Ruger SR9c, the Springfield Sub-Compact XD is, as the Italians would say, super brutto. Eccoci qua. Here we are. And we are not alone . . .

Here’s a profile of another compact killer: the Glock 26. Compared to the Glock (above), the Sub-Compact XD doesn’t, aesthetically. Of course, neither polymer pistol is what you’d call a beauty queen. Both guns (and Smith & Wesson’s M&P) make a cinder block look like museum-quality sculpture. That said, the Springfield Sub-Compact XD has its advantages over its natural born enemy.

For one thing, the XD’s mag release is ambidextrous; if you’re left-handed, the XD Sub-Compact wins. For another, the Sub-Compact XD has a grip safety. (Debate that amongst yourselves.) A lot of shooters find the Springfield’s grip angle more comfortable than Herr Glock’s Glock. Some gunslingers appreciate the Springfield’s erect nipple (a.ka. the chamber loaded indicator). The Sub-Compact XD also has a rail for a micro-light and carries more ammo than its Austrian rival. How great is that?

I’m not sure. Thirteen rounds (XD) vs. ten bullets (26) doesn’t seem like a life-or-death difference to me. Comparing the 13-round Springfield to an eight-round .45 offers a more compelling comparison. But one thing’s for sure: if you plan on tactical reloads with the XD Sub-Compact, or any sub-compact gun, it’s only a matter of time before you pinch your hand whilst inserting a fresh complement of cartridges.

And when I say “pinch” I mean “cause an injury that may require stitches and leave a lifelong scar” and a dangerous aversion to tactical reloads. Alternatively, you could load-up the Sub-Compact XD with the 15-round magazine (with free! grip extension) and forgag the reloading deal. But then you’d have a gun with a handle only marginally smaller than the full-sized XD’s; a firearm that won’t imperil your palm and holsters nineteen rounds of ballistic reassurance.

All things being equal (which they never are), it’s a moot point. Ask any diehard (they hope) self-defense shooter: accuracy trumps capacity. In the hitting what you aim at department, the Springfield Sub-Compact XD does not disappoint. It really is as good as the Glock 26. Or better.

With its extra weight (26 ounces vs. 20), the Sub-Compact XD manages recoil more confidently than the Glock. Although the Springfield’s bore axis is dramatically higher than its Austrian counterpart, the weight helps settle things down quickly, enabling accurate “follow-up” shots. Truth be told, either gun can be mastered with regular practice. But the heft is an important consideration for a newbie, who probably won’t train more than once a month, whose life might one day depend on accurately firing a 9mm firearm with a short barrel.

The bottom line is the same for either firearm: superb accuracy at combat distances. One-inch groups at six yards are eminently doable. In terms of shooting on the move, the chances of hitting center mass are as good with the Springfield Sub-Compact XD as they are with the baby Glock—or just about any other small(ish) gun you can name.

The Springfield Sub-Compact XD vs. Glock 26 debate is destined to rage amongst the gunnoscenti for years to come. Meanwhile, gun buyers should not get distracted by invidious distinctions. When it comes to reliability, the two firearms stand head and shoulders above their competition .

With simple lubrication and occasional cleaning, the XD will faultlessly fire tens of thousands of rounds, even in the harshest conditions. Rental guns, for example, have processed 250,000 rounds without a hitch. Our sample ate-up and spit-out everything we fed it, from the humblest Blazer to the loftiest Hornady Critical Defense. Over the long term, the Tenifer Plus+ coated XD is a far more solid choice than flashier alternatives (cough Ruger cough).

On the downside, the Springfield Sub-Compact XD really needs that pinkie extension for comfort and control; a cheap upgrade that should be standard-issue. Also, more than a few shooters prefer the Glock’s quick-breaking trigger and lightning fast reset to the Springfield’s relatively mushy go-pedal and long distance reset. And the Sub-Compact’s plastic case is unforgivably Day’s Inn compared to the XD-M’s Ritz Carlton-class carrier.

It’s only a matter of time before the Springfield Sub-Compact XD gets the dash-M treatment. The new Sub-M’s improved grip will be much appreciated in colder climes, and the chevrons on the barrel should help make the design less of a dog’s breakfast. The question is, why bother?

There’s nothing wrong with the current Sub-Compact XD’s ability to accomplish its mission. It’s a dead nuts reliable, more-accurate-than-you-are carry piece. So you might want to wait until the Sub-Compact XD-M hits the shelves and then bargain hard on the “old” Sub-Compact XD. A keenly priced Sub-Compact XD could be just the ticket. Mate.

SPECIFICATIONS:

Caliber: 9x19MM
Magazines: 1 – 13 Round Compact, 1 – 16 Round w/ Grip Extension
Barrel: 3” Steel, Melonite, Fully Supported Ramp Sights: Dovetail Front and Rear (Steel) 3 – Dot Trigger pull: 5.5 – 7.7 lbs. Frame: Black Polymer
Slide: Forged Steel, Melonite Finish
Recoil System: Dual Spring with Full Length Guide rod
Length: 6.25”
Height: 4.75” w/ Compact Mag, 5.5” w/ Extended Mag
Weight w/ Empty: 26 ozs. w/ Compact Mag, Magazine: 27 ozs. w/ Extended Mag

RATINGS:

Style *

If it was a dog you’d shave its ass and make it walk backwards.

Ergonomics Carry * * *

A bit heavy, but only a bit. Finding holsters that can accommodate that XXL trigger guard is a bitch, but a 13-round mag makes it good to stow.

Ergonomics Firing * * * * *

A bit snappy, as you’d expect. But the extra weight helps you hit what you’re aiming at and get back on target right quick.

Reliability * * * * *

It’s what allows XD to be spoken in the same sentence as Glock.

Customize this * * *

The mini-rail-enabled flashlight option is welcome, but the lack of suitable holsters makes that a problematic proposition. The sights are sufficient. So . . . what more do you need, really?

Overall Rating * * * *

No beauty queen, but no safe queen either. A practical carry gun upon which you can bet your life.

avatar

About Robert Farago

Robert Farago is the Publisher of The Truth About Guns (TTAG). He started the site to explore the ethics, morality, business, politics, culture, technology, practice, strategy, dangers and fun of guns.

47 Responses to Gun Review: Springfield Armory Sub-Compact XD

  1. avatarEric says:

    I wonder if S&W will join in the fun and make an M&P9sc

  2. avatarKen says:

    Springfield just came out with the XDm-9mm Compact. It is slightly smaller in height (4.6″ vs. 4.75″) and only 3/4 inch longer (7″ vs. 6.25″). Same 13 round magazine size, but can use the XD-9mm 19 round magazine with the extension. Lots of holsters available – can use all the XDm-9 and XD-9 Compact holsters, plus new ones coming on line from almost all major manufacturers (I have holsters from Comp-Tac, Blackhawk, and Galco). It’s the height, not length, that has most impact on conceal-ability. Why buy a sub-compact XD? If 3/4 inch less length is that important, wait till the XDm sub-compact comes out.

    • avatarB says:

      thanks for the info, makes me wish I had waited a bit longer, but I need I needed a gun for the neighborhood I’m going to be moving to.

  3. avatarChris Dumm says:

    I’ve shot both the full-size and the compact 9mm XDs extensively. A friend of mine owns both of them, so my familiarity with both models is more than “I fondled them at a gun show” deep. The subcompact is his daily carry gun, and the full-size model lives in his bedside gun safe at home. No matter what gun he reaches for, whether in the dead of night or in a parking lot, they both feel and function and fire exactly the same. One is just a bit shorter and easier to carry.

    RF is absolutely right about these guns: they are accurate, strong, and stone-cold reliable. They’ll put a whole magazine (short or extended) into a ragged cloverleaf at 7 yards and they’ll do it without fail, again and again, until you’re standing in a pile of empty brass. I’ve never seen a jam or failure of any kind, through dozens of boxes of ammo.

    The subcompact XD 9mm is backwards-compatible with the full-size XD 9mm magazines, but this compatibility isn’t reciprocal: the full-size XD 9mm cannot use either of the subcompact’s magazines. This is no different from the 9mm Glock 9mm family, where a higher-numbered (and thus smaller) Glock 9mms can accept the magazines from lower-numbered (and larger) Glock 9mms, but not vice-versa.

    The XD subcompact ships with a short magazine and a full-size magazine with a grip adapter. Neither of these will fit a full-size XD, but full-size XD magazines are for sale everywhere and will fit either gun. To avoid the finger-smashing tactical reload, use the compact magazine for CCW and buy a full-size XD magazine for a high-cap (and pinchless) tactical reload. Ditch the adapter magazine, or keep it in your range bag for non-tactical use.

    If you own both sized of XD, avoiding the ‘short magazine in full-size gun’ problem is equally simple. Leave the compact magazine loaded in the subcompact, and use full-size magazines for ALL your reloads in both pistols and you’ll never go wrong.

    Note: when the XD subcompact gets the ergonomic ‘dash-M’ treatment, the magazines will not be compatible with any ‘non-M’ XD.

    • avatarBryan says:

      Can you explain this pinching thing more in detail? I am new to handguns and am considering a compact 9mm. Thanks.

  4. avatarPete says:

    I’ve had one since 2008 and its been my daily carry piece since then. When it came out it was only 10+1 with the compact mag, but the newer 13+1 is a great replacement. It was my first pistol ever, I paid $399+shipping+FFL.

    I’ve had no problems with it (except for my reloaded ammo, which was the ammo’s fault) and it shoots where you point it. My only gripe is the trigger safety which I find annoying after a box or two of rounds.

    After a couple of years in the crossbreed super-tuck there is some wear on the slide starting to show but no rust. I figure I’ll duracoat it green or black whenever it needs it.

    • avatarOctavio Luevano says:

      I carry an xd9 sc Its showing signs of wear. Thats just a sign of commitment and pride. Congrats.

  5. avatarSevesteen says:

    I carry the .40 version of the XD sub. The triggerguard makes little difference to holsters unless you are carrying in generic–you shouldn’t do that anyway.

    But one of the things that surprised me was how close in overall dimensions the XD subcompact is to the Glock 19–The 19 looks a lot bigger, but is almost identical in height at the grip, and only about half an inch longer barrel. If you carry IWB, there’s no difference in the ability to conceal either gun, and you get a place for your pinkie with the Glock. I didn’t realize that until I made a holster for a 19.

  6. avatarDonWorsham says:

    Is that a Standard Schnauzer or a mini?

  7. avatarJohn says:

    Yes it is a goofy looking little pistol, but I’m sure it gets the job done.

  8. avatarTexas Jack says:

    I bought the full size XD9 (they call it the “Tactical”) and used it to fire for my CHL. I keep it in a drawer at the opposite side of the house from my bedroom, where my sub-compact has its place by the bed. I do not leave the house without it. I haven’t kept count of the rounds fired in the last four years, but the failures I know – none. Chris and Pete have it all correct. I am totally satisfied with both of these fine weapons.

  9. avatarUnibrowser says:

    Fugly little ucker!
    My Glock has a better trigger and is easily adapted to any situation. My XD, I offloaded it on a guy who thought it was better than a Glock. His loss, my gain!

    • avatarduke says:

      XD shoots circles around Glock.

      • avatarJJ says:

        Pure baloney… the Glock is a far more accurate and reliable pistol… less felt recoil too… lots of info on XD reliability problems…

        • avatarB says:

          Oh look, it’s a Glock fanboy. Now why the f*ck would anyone listen to you? You just came on here to knock the XD and tell people how great your Glock is. Maybe, if you could actually post something constructive, you could post links to reference what some of those reliability issues are – keep in mind, don’t post information that you found on competitor’s websites (we all know how truthful competitors are), or info about the XD(s), XD(m), or other variants – those are completely different guns. Just the XD; and we don’t want any info about your glock either, this page is not about that gun.

          It’s funny how I never found any of that info that you talked about, but feel free to post it here.

          If you can’t post any constructive criticism about the XD while leaving glock out of it, it’s safe to say you just came here to troll about your glock.

  10. avatarKirby L. Wallace says:

    Just bought the XD sub in 40SW. Came with four mags: two 9 rd, one with a pinkie extention that you wanted and which fits my hand very well. Also came with a full length 10 rd mag, and a 12 rd mag of exactly the same dimensions that actually holds 13 rds of 40sw.

    Overall, quite happy.

  11. avatarRon says:

    The last sentence in this evaluation says it all .
    ” A practical carry gun upon which you can bet your life.”
    Isn’t that exactly what we are all hoping to get when when we lay-out our hard earned money to purchase a carry gun?
    Sounds like ***** to me.

    • avatarB says:

      yeah, and there are guns out there that you can buy for only a couple hundred that have a good amount of issues, especially ones that people constantly complain about.

      I’d rather take a short summary over one that reads “A reliable gun….that just occasionally misfeeds, stove-pipes, and fails to eject. Sometimes the sights will be off, so you will need to ship it to the factory for realignment, and you need to send it to the company at least once a every half-year to ensure it stays reliable and no parts break or malfunction, but it comes with a warranty, so it’s all good.”

      Even though the summary doesn’t need to say much because it’s already discussed in the previous paragraphs, sometimes, less is better. It indicates there aren’t a lot of problems.

  12. avatarbryan says:

    Having owned full-size Glock, a KelTec and an HK USP Compact as well as recently acquiring the 9mm SubCompact mentioned here i have a decent cross section of high end and budget minded handguns…Anyone who cries ‘Glock’ is either unfamiliar with XDs or has watched US Marshals a few too many times…

    The XD costs nearly $100 less in my area; the magazines are metal not plastic; its actually CCW friendly (unlike my USPc which is like carrying a brick in my waistband)…and lastly it has 2 features a Glock doesnt but should–the loaded chamber indicator and cocking pin indicator–these are very nice piece-of-mind additions when carrying or instructing at the range….

    Don’t get me wrong…Glock makes fine firearms–for people who prefer to pay extra for a brand name…they are equally reliable, easy to care for, with a plethora of accessories…but $100 difference buys plenty of ammo

    just my $.02

    • avatarB says:

      Hm, even though you say the USP is like a brick, I would actually also compare the XD sub-compact to a brick. It’s not hugely concealable in my opinion, unless you wear baggy or loose clothing, and it weighs enough that you probably wouldn’t go jogging with it (especially with bullets in it), even though it’s called a sub-compact. If I were to try to go jogging with this, I think it would be pretty obvious that I’m carrying, and it would probably bounce around a lot even with a holster – I would probably take a Beretta Nano or similar gun for jogging or exercise.

  13. avatarMike says:

    Shot the XD40 & an S&W Sigma .40 with similar grouping. I’d rather have the Springfield.

  14. avatarchub says:

    just bought a 40 xd subcompact springfield and i love it, but i was wondering can i put the full size 4o xd rd into the sub and would it mess up the gun if it do.

  15. avatarsherica says:

    owned it 4 a year and love it!!!!had all kinds of nice guns for 19 plus years……friends own glocks, in my opinion springfield hit a home run.glocks are great, hate when glock people think nothing can be better. give credit where its due.

  16. avatarCCope says:

    I own all and the glocks sure are dusty!

  17. avatarDave says:

    I have to disagree about the author’s opinion of the Springfield’s looks. I own the first gen Bi-tone sub compact XD in .40, and compared to my Gen 4 Glcok 27, it looks AND feels much better in my hand. My Glock 27 gets the job done (it’s my off duty firearm) but if my department authorized any other gun outside of Glock for off duty, I’d take my XD subcompact every time. It’s shoots tighter groups, has a MUCH MUCH smoother trigger, holds more rounds, has a rail for a tactical light like my Streamlight TLR-3 etc…. So, what bothers me is that my Springfield, which was developed and produced years before my Gen 4 Glock, has more bells and whistles, shoots better, grip safety, loaded chamber indicator, high capacity magazines with mag sleeve/grip, and has better ergonomics, and costs same or less… What’s up with that Glock?

  18. avatarTony Swanner says:

    Can the XD 40 sub compact be converted to a 9MM?

    • avatarMike T. says:

      You would need to swap barrels and magazines. But if you got a SIG 357 barrel you could use the 40 mags. Ask Springfield for prices. Cheaper than buying a totally new pistol by 1/2 or more

  19. avatarRyan says:

    I purchased my first handgun about a year ago, a Springfield XD .40 S&W Tactical (5″ barrel). Having shot regularly with it for a while now, I feel confident to go for my CCW license. What sold me on the Springfield over the Glock was the feel. I held both in my hand, extended my arm, and looked down the sights. With the Springfield, they were already lined up with no manual correction needed. I looked away, then looked back, sights remained dead-on. I handled the Glock, and some manual adjustment was required to line my sights up, in an extended hand stance. Just to be sure, I switched off several times, and each time the XD sights were lined right up. When I went to shoot it a few weeks after bringing it home, I was not disappointed. I shot great groups, and allowing a natural, controlled recoil, I was right back in the sight picture naturally, no correction needed.

    All that being said, I am now looking for a weapon to CCW. Leaning very strongly toward coming back for some more Springfield based on my awesome experience with the first one. I believe the major difference (at least in my case) to be that the XD has a more favorable ramp angle for my natural grip. My only question, and I guess I will answer this by more handling, is whether to go sub-compact, or just compact.

  20. avatarWade says:

    I shot my Dad’s XD 9mm sub-compact, liked it but thought the trigger needed work. I decided to order a XD 40 with a factory trigger job, and night sights on the bitone. It is my go to primary sidearm, I carry it often and it is very accurate.

  21. avatarCoinneach says:

    I picked up a well-used (and thoroughly broke-in) subcompact XD today and immediately put 100 rounds of mixed ball and hp through it. GREAT little gun, smooth and reliable, and as the review noted, more accurate than me. Ain’t pretty by a long way, but pretty counts for exactly nothing if it doesn’t run. And it runs, oh yes.

  22. avatarJacque says:

    Just thought I would throw my 2 cents in…the Springfield XD SC is what I carry, and I had the opportunity to test several handguns (including a Ruger and Glock) before I decided to purchase this one. As a woman with smaller hands and weak wrists I find the XD SC very comfortable to hold and shoot. My husband has the XD and I can tell a notable difference. I have tried other sub’s and this by far was the one I found to be easier to control (the muzzle flip and recoil are minimal and the reset was perfect). The only problem I have is that it is a bit bulky (top heavy) as you mentioned in the review, which causes a problem when it comes to finding a conceal carry purse that it will actually fit in properly. This also poses a bit of a problem when I want to carry on my hip (but this is partially due to my holster I am sure.) I just wish it was small enough to carry comfortably.

    **Additional note…I personally like the added grip safety, but that’s just me. :)

  23. avatarBillC says:

    Been around firearms for my entire 32 year LEO career. Shot off a box with my new XD 9mm subcompact today. First gun I ever fired that felt broken in right out of the box. Cycled smooth, amazingly tight groupings, felt good in the hands. Even doing look over the sights double pops the gun felt true and was right on. Think it is going to be a keeper.

  24. avatarMike T. says:

    The XD sub compact is a better machine than the Glock sub compacts. and safer to handle in stress situations. And I have used both. matter of personal preference of course.
    As to holsters..try a Don Hume JIT slide. It fit mine just fine and for $25 it is a bargain.
    I prefer the 9mm because in the real world the 9mm with decent ammo will do the job just as well as a .40 or even dare I say..45 ACP. At combat ranges the bad gut would not know the difference is hit in a vital zone.
    As to pretty is as pretty does. The XD is a beauty queen in action. Again..personal view.

  25. A customer of ours referred us over to this page. We make custom Kydex holsters for the Springfield XD Subcompact, as well as most other makes/models. You can send me an email at ntcustomkydex@yahoo.com for more information.

    Please visit our Facebook page for more information and like us at http://www.facebook.com/northtexascustomkydex/

    Check out our APRIL SPECIAL on Springfield holsters!

  26. avatarjohn boyd says:

    I think it is a serviceable enough appearing piece, never bought a gun for its “looks” – sorry, reviewer.
    But accuracy is enny guns saving grace, and one inch groups at combat range is good enough and should be good enough for enny shooter. Even for a self, and home defense centric shooter like myself.

    I am currently carrying the Taurus Judge, 3″ magnum Chambers, The modern Winchester PDX1 defensive rds with 4 plated discs and 16 plated bb’s each 3″ magnum round is good enuf for me.

    but i am interested in a semi auto for cc. This Springfield XD Sub-Compact 3″ fits the CC bill, but is not heavy enuff in calibre for my desires. I am seeking .45 cal perhaps like Glock mod. 21 or something. But I really am a big-bore hawg; Excellent review.

    • avatarJJ says:

      If you crave .45ACP… pony up the big bucks for a Kimber Ultra CDP… Series 1… if you can find one… Superb pistols. The Para P12 is not as smooth… but a nice piece. I am very pleased with my XD40sc… very reliable and accurate, traded my P238 for it… I had no confidence that a .380 would put the BG down… and I am not that great of a shot to hit an eyeball at 7 yds!

      • avatarJJ says:

        This comment was cravenly revised… I traded for a GLOCK 23, not a XD40SC… sort of tells ya all a great deal… like with Odumbo… the truth is very elusive. How many other comments were revised?

  27. I have been shooting rifles for the better part of 40 years. I was always into long range accuracy but i have recently purchaced a inexpensive 9 mm. now i am looking for a small or compact 45 acp or a Sig sauer, nano,ruger something not too expensive but adaptable for a laser, flashlight & maybe a rail for a scope. so any info into what would b good for me or suggestions with a low to high price range( preferred) lower range

  28. hey fellow gun enthusiaits, I have a problem that i hope u could help me with. I am looking for a small Compact concealable semi auto pistol for my job, the one I use now is too bulky & hard too conceal which could put me in a compromising position. I prob could’nt afford a Glock Sig Sauer or Ruger but u guys & or girls would know what would work for me. I had a 9 mm. that i wast happy with, I wiymguld prefer a 45 acp or maybe a 380. what are urs thoughts on a Nano a Caracal

  29. Sorry i got cut off but i would like something i could put a laser & flashlight on. thanks for any info it would be greatly apprieciated .

  30. avatarCharles W. Howard says:

    I $h!t¢@nd my Glock 36 due to the so-called “LimpWristing” stove pipe jam problem. It has been replaced by the XD 9mm Subcompact. This gun is the real deal! It doesn’t much care how you hold it! The 13 round mag capacity is nice! The gun is dead nuts accurate! I use a Medium size Versa Carry holster and can carry anywhere, no problems when running, jogging, etc..

    There is nothing out there that comes close to this gun, in my opinion!

  31. avatarNobber says:

    I like to suck on women’s toes

  32. avatarCA says:

    I give exactly two pinches of goat shit what any gun looks like. A gun is a tool and it better work. Firearm ownership (concealed carry in this case) is an evolution for me. My thoughts and ideas have changed over the years. I used to think that a pistol was built by Colt and it held 7+1. I carried a 1911 in my truck (Texas Farm Truck Plates) I dealt with dirt and rust (and reliability problems) for a few years and I loved that gun but lost confidence in it. Alas, I fired and hauled a Glock (pre concealed carry) I thought I was going to shit rainbows. Glock 23 for the last 10 yrs I have all the mags of every length the 9mm barrel and mags and have carried and run the crap out of it without fail. I though that gun was all I ever needed. Last year I bought my wife a Glock 36 and I carries easier for me than the 23. Period. I carry a keltec
    p3at when it’s not working for me to carry a 9+. So I decide that a sub 9 i.e. Glock 26 would work even better because I am more likely to draw down on a coyote or a feral pig than a bad guy and more rnds = more dead animals. I then get in an argument over G26 vs XD sub with a buddy and he loans me his XD sub and I had to buy one. This gun conceals well, carries lots of ammo, feels right, shoots good, and never fails. Then it cost $100 less than a Glock and has more stuff in the box that I can use. The evolution continues. Don’t be a hater. Just shoot it.

  33. avatargary sabatini says:

    ive been around guns my whole life, been in the military, worked in a gun shop, have a ccw permit and bought sold and traded more guns than I can list. when looking at a gun, close your eyes, pull the gun up and open your eyes when the gun is fully extended. the sites should be aligned left and right and up and down. unless you train a lot with a glock, a glocks sites will be elevated. the xd has awesome pointability and great features. I carry a xdsc daily and have a full size too. try one on and youll see what I mean! great guns! great review!

  34. avatarrodger says:

    I Have a glock 19 gen3 and a Xd sc9. I love both guns but if I only had one it would be my glock. Is it better than my xd? NO but it shots better in my hand. They are both great guns but what fits me might not be your cup of tea

Leave a Reply

Please use your real name instead of you company name or keyword spam.