1911: Unsuitable for Self-Defense?

Regular readers know I train under David Kenik. The rabbi is a self-effacing gun guy who’s quick to point out that his advice is his advice. He’s happy to explain why he holds his beliefs, listen to counter-arguments and let you decide whether or not you want to accept or ignore his dictates. In short, no flaming guys. Attack the philosophy, not the philosopher. (Offensive comments will be edited.) OK, so, the rabbi reckons 1911-style guns are unsuitable for daily carry. “They’re the easiest guns in the world to shoot someone with,” Kenik likes to say. “But the hardest guns NOT to shoot someone with.” In other words, it’s all about the trigger. The 1911-style gun’s trigger is too light for the stress of battle. Here’s the relevant section from his book Armed Response.

I had an accidental discharge at an IPSC match. During a particularly stressful fast reload, my finger pressed the trigger without my being aware of it until the round fired. It is commonly stated that ADs are caused by poor gun handling skills and you just need to keep your finger off the trigger. Well, I practiced keeping my finger off the trigger for 20 years. The difference at the match was the higher level of stress that I was experiencing for the first time affected my abilities and awareness.

A few weeks after my AD, I did a training class on a FATS (Firearm Training Simulation) system, which uses real handguns converted to shoot lasers at a movie screen displaying tactical scenarios. With the remembrance of my AD fresh in my mind, I specifically checked my finger during and after stressful encounters. I found my finger subconsciously on the trigger three times during the one hour session! This proved to me that even twenty years of shooting a 1911 and several seasons of action shooting competitions did not prepare me for the effects that higher levels of stress cause.

Coincidentally, a short time later, I cam across details of a law enforcement study that demonstrated that under high levels of stress, the trigger finger often subconsciously travels to the trigger to “confirm its position.” Lt. Dave Spaulding, of the Montgomery County, Ohio Sheriff’s Office, observed that 632 out of 674 officers tested periodically placed their fingers in the trigger guard during FATS training. This is astounding—94% of the trained police officers teste placed their finger on the trigger under stress! This number included many highly-skilled and motivated officers. The officer that he observed doing thse “trigger searches had no memory of doing so . . .

An accidental discharge is more likely with a single-action trigger than a double-action trigger because of its short, light trigger pull. Had I been using a single-action trigger during my FATS exercise, I might have had three ADs, because all it takes to fire a single-action gun is just a relatively light touch of the trigger . . .

My conclusion is that unless you train extensively under extreme stress, the double-action trigger would be a safer choice for self-defense.

In other words, 1911s are more dangerous for self-defense work than double-action combat handguns. Makes sense to me. While I’ve shot thousands of rounds through 1911s, I still get the occasional “Hey, I didn’t mean to fire that round” moment. And that’s without [more than my normal amount of] stress.

But then I’m a relative piker paying this guy cash money to learn how to safely defend myself and my loved ones with a firearm. What’s your take?

avatar

About Robert Farago

Robert Farago is the Publisher of The Truth About Guns (TTAG). He started the site to explore the ethics, morality, business, politics, culture, technology, practice, strategy, dangers and fun of guns.

6 Responses to 1911: Unsuitable for Self-Defense?

  1. avatarPatrick Carrube says:

    In my weekly matches, I often RO individual stages when needed. I have seen a few AD’s, but I would like to point out that they aren’t exclusive to 1911’s. They occur in all classes, even Grand Master, and in all divisions. Five, ten, and twenty years of practice means nothing unless it was proper practice. While it certainly will make you a better gun handler in the long term, action and competitive shooting does nothing to advance your basic fundamental skill-set in and of itself. I would argue that action shooting will actually amplify any fundamental flaw (such as trigger control) and will force you to become a better handler in order to be competitive. As an RO, we expect new shooters to make mistakes and have flaws in their matches. It is OK as long as there is a large enough safety margin. As they say, you can’t make an omelet without breaking some eggs. It may sound dangerous, but IPSC is in the top 5 of the safest sports in the world, most injuries coming from sprained ankles.

    To new readers of TTAG, let me be the first to say that ANY study showing how LEO reacts/acts under pressure isn't worth a damn. From the LEO's I've spoken with, and from what I have read on Federal/State reports, local LEO's only practice 4 times a year (on average, special groups and SWAT aren't included). I would point out that this is "practice" and not "real world shit my pants training". Practice in this scenario means shooting at a paper target to prepare for an upcoming qualification shoot. LEO officers are great people and I thank them all the time for their service (same goes for military and veterans). However, I do NOT consider them to be "experts" in firearms or firearm handling simply because their job requires them to handle/carry a gun. The guy standing on my neighbor’s roof with a hammer isn’t considered an architect or an expert carpenter because he is carrying a hammer. He’s just a guy nailing in new plywood.

  2. avatarRoy Hill says:

    What’s funny is that I have heard another very famous self-defense shooting instructor say the same thing about Glocks.

    This very famous instructor said something like, “The best thing about the Glock is that it’s very easy to shoot. The worst thing about the Glock is that it’s very easy to shoot.”

    I know, I know….It’s a “Glock action” not a “double-action.”

    But still…it’s a polymer pistol with a trigger design that makes its manual of arms a lot like the old double-action revolvers cops used for decades.

  3. avatarBrett Solomon says:

    You still gotta swipe that safety off on the 1911 (and it would be real foolish not to use it), unlike a Glock or other DAO pistol.

  4. avatarSailorcurt says:

    "Is Gun…is not safe."

    This is sort of like the security dilemma: The best security in the world is a system that is impossible to access. The problem is that it isn't useable at all.

    The most useable system is the one with no security, no firewalls, no passwords…totally open access. The problem is that potentially sensitive information is available to anyone that wants it.

    Everything is a tradeoff.

    The only truly safe gun for any use is the plastic one that doesn't actually go "bang" when you pull the trigger…but that's not very useful in a self-defense situation.

  5. avatarale440 says:

    the 1911 is one of the best hand guns ever designed, made , used… period i dont know dual safeties

  6. avatarJohn C says:

    You can keep your 1911 if you like it. Period.

Leave a Reply

Please use your real name instead of you company name or keyword spam.