democraticunderground.com shares an email making the rounds that stokes the fires of the Obama As Gun Grabber meme. As we wrote yesterday, this is a great psychotic episode at the wrong mental health facility. Yes, there is a U.N. move afoot to restrict if not eliminate private small arms ownership. But this ain’t it. Methinks it’s time for the Obama administration to tell U.S. citizens that the proposed (and not yet specified) U.N. Small Arms Treaty is designed to control the flow of military weapons. And if you don’t trust the Prez (why would you?), rest assured that there plenty of U.S. arms manufacturers, industry reps and gun owners groups keeping their eye on the treaty. You don’t hear the NRA wailing about the U.N. Small Arms Treaty, do you? And for good reason. Not to mention the fact that any treaty would have to be ratified by the U.S. Senate. Anyway, here’s the smear:

OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT. IF THIS PASSES, THERE could BE WAR

On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States

On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States . The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.

Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment. This has happened in other countries, past and present!

THIS IS NOT A JOKE NOR A FALSE WARNING.

As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. Read the Article U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto. The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush’s administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.

Click on the link below for further acknowledgement…..

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0…

One Response to Misleading Email on U.N. Small Arms Treaty Making the Rounds

  1. Gun rights advocates continue to be flummoxed by the fact that Obama refuses to be Clinton 2.0.

    There's no doubt that Clinton decided to pick a fight with the NRA early on in his presidency. Whether he did so out of deep conviction or because it's always convenient to have a whipping boy (particularly once you're convinced that it's a group that isn't going to vote for you anyway) is an open question. Nevertheless, Clinton's obsession with taking down the "gun lobby" cost him big and Obama knows it. O may be a lot of things but he knows how to get and how to keep power, and he knows that starting a fight with American gun owners simply isn't a smart move.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *